Chicken-Little Cortez Caught Out By Science.

[BIAD]

It seems the dancing actress Democrat was wrong again and science found out it wasn't
the cow farts. Orange Ball In The Sky Bad.

Bombshell Claim: Scientists Find "Man-made Climate Change Doesn't Exist In Practice"

'A new scientific study could bust wide open deeply flawed fundamental assumptions underlying
controversial climate legislation and initiatives such as the Green New Deal, namely, the degree to
which 'climate change' is driven by natural phenomena vs. man-made issues measured as carbon
footprint.

Scientists in Finland found "practically no anthropogenic [man-made] climate change" after a series
of studies. 

“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about
0.1°C because of carbon dioxide.
The human contribution was about 0.01°C”, the Finnish researchers
bluntly state in one among a series of papers.

This has been collaborated by a team at Kobe University in Japan, which has furthered the Finnish
researchers' theory:
"New evidence suggests that high-energy particles from space
known as galactic cosmic rays affect the Earth's climate by
increasing cloud cover, causing an 'umbrella effect',"

The just published study has found, a summary of which has been released in the journal Science
Daily. The findings are hugely significant given this 'umbrella effect' -an entirely natural occurrence 
-could be the prime driver of climate warming, and not man-made factors.

The scientists involved in the study are most concerned with the fact that current climate models
driving the political side of debate, most notably the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's
(IPCC) climate sensitivity scale, fail to incorporate this crucial and potentially central variable of
increased cloud cover. 

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has discussed the impact of cloud cover
on climate in their evaluations, but this phenomenon has never been considered in climate predictions
due to the insufficient physical understanding of it," comments Professor Hyodo in Science Daily.

"This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate.
When galactic cosmic rays increase, so do low clouds, and when cosmic rays decrease clouds do as
well, so climate warming may be caused by an opposite-umbrella effect."

In their related paper, aptly titled, “No experimental evidence for the significant anthropogenic
[man-made] climate change”, the Finnish scientists find that low cloud cover "practically" controls
global temperatures but that “only a small part” of the increased carbon dioxide concentration is
anthropogenic, or caused by human activity. 

The following is a key bombshell section in one of the studies conducted by Finland's Turku University
team: 

We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute
correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature.

The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction
on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion
for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide.

That is why 6 J. KAUPPINEN AND P. MALMI IPCC represents the climate sensitivity
more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the
anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have practically
no anthropogenic climate change.
The low clouds control mainly the global temperature.

This raises urgent questions and central contradictions regarding current models which politicians
and environmental groups across the globe are using to push radical economic changes on their
countries' populations.

Conclusions from both the Japanese and Finnish studies strongly suggest, for example, that
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's "drastic measures to cut carbon emissions" which would
ultimately require radical legislation changes to "remake the U.S. economy" would not only
potentially bankrupt everyone but simply wouldn't even work, at least according to the new
Finnish research team findings.



To put AOC's "drastic measures" in perspective -based entirely on the fundamental assumption
of the monumental and disastrous impact of human activity on the climate -consider the following
conclusions from the Finnish studies: 

“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide.
The human contribution was about 0.01°C.”
Which leads the scientists to state further:

“Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased carbon dioxide
is less than 10 percent, we have practically no anthropogenic climate
change,” the researchers concluded.

And the team in Japan has called for a total reevaluation of current climate models, which remain
dangerously flawed for dismissing a crucial variable: 

This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate.
When galactic cosmic rays increase, so do low clouds, and when cosmic rays decrease clouds do
as well, so climate warming may be caused by an opposite-umbrella effect.

The umbrella effect caused by galactic cosmic rays is important when thinking about current global
warming as well as the warm period of the medieval era.

Failure to account for this results in the following, according to the one in the series of studies:
"The IPCC climate sensitivity is about one order of magnitude too high, because a strong negative
feedback of the clouds is missing in climate models."

"If we pay attention to the fact that only a small part of the increased CO2 concentration is
anthropogenic, we have to recognize that the anthropogenic climate change does not exist
in practice," the researchers conclude. 

Though we doubt the ideologues currently pushing to radically remake the American economy
through what ends up being a $93 trillion proposal (according to one study) -including AOC's call
for a whopping 70% top tax rate -will carefully inquire of this new bombshell scientific confirmation
presented in the new research, we at least hope the US scientific community takes heed before it's
too late in the cause of accurate and authentic science that would stave off irreparable economic
disaster that would no doubt ripple across the globe, adding to both human and environmental
misery.  

And "too late" that is, not for some mythical imminent or near-future "global warming Armageddon"
as the currently in vogue highly politicized "science" of activists and congress members alike claims...'

ZeroHedge