We sometimes look at the news that's offered to us in a simple black-and-white manner with -for example,
the Manchester Arena bombing in the UK as that the act of an radicalised young man wanting to show his
dismay at how his ideology is perceived by others.
If information is shown in such a way to indicate a lone person performed the terrible assault, then it's natural
for many to assume that is the work of a single individual and nothing more organised is behind it.
It can also be taken for granted that from time-to-time, the UK security forces react to an unknown incident
like the Manchester bombing in order to see if such an organisation does exist and is embedded in the UK's
society. To do so, may lead investigators into the discovery of a network that has grown to a stage where a
country-wide campaign of violence could be implimented. An 'invasion' if you will.
For almost three years, the public were led to believe that a man -Salman Abedi, living with his family in the
Manchester area walked into the building where Ariana Grande was perfoming in front of a large audience
and detonated a bomb packed with bolts, nails and other material to inflict extreme harm on an unsuspecting
group of people.
The public -via the mainstream media, were also told that Salman Abedi may have discussed his plans with
his brother and by absence of reporting Salman's plans, we can suggest he agreed with the proposed act.
What is rarely mentioned is the frequent travelling back-and-forth from the UK to other countries by certain
ethnic groups and the ease that this is done. One would think that with this knowledge, places like sea-ports
and airports would obviously be kept up to speed with any unusual behavior or possible terror-cells developing
within the UK.
Regular travelling from a country to another for lengths of time also has an effect on currency, especially if
a family or group relies on Government-backed welfare and assistance in other ways of sustaining a decent
lifestyle.
Money that is casual in one country may be at a premium in another country and could be used for good or
sinister means with a more expanded potential in a realm where cash is sparse. But is that a healthy reason
that UK monies are transported out of the public domain without those who govern having concerns?
Surely this could be seen by some as giving the UK's wealth away to another country without consent from the
public and done under the guise of an assumption that particular ethnic families who live in the UK, live constantly
in the UK.
Put yourself in this position, if you were born and live in a country, why would you regulary visit another country?
To visit friends and relatives: Yes, but regular? It's costly and if you're relying on Government assistance to help
with rearing a family, wouldn't be prudent to use that money for that reason?
For religious reasons: Yes, but if you're so devout to your religion and it requires you to be in a partiular place to
perform the worship, why leave that sacred land?
I would suggest any act of regular travel from a wealthy country to a poorer country would have a negative effect
on the affluent one, whether the reasons are fair or dubious. Yet, nothing is done.
So unsuspecting people died in a hail of speeding bolts and nails. The malefactor died with his victims.
A Hearing was brought to discover what actually happened and why safety factors to avoid terrorism -something
that is becoming more-and-more a common concern these days, failed to foil the plot.
What is coming to light is that there's something more darker going on by some who abuse the freedom to travel
to a country in order to terrorise it. Morlocks and Eloi.
See...? Everything involves travelling to other countries to not only avoid arrest, but to also take part in violence in other countries.
And they they all just cruise through Customs at airports without a single glance. Vehicles are bought, apartments are rented and
flight tickets are purchased to get to execute their plans.
Where did the money come from...? the UK?!
the Manchester Arena bombing in the UK as that the act of an radicalised young man wanting to show his
dismay at how his ideology is perceived by others.
If information is shown in such a way to indicate a lone person performed the terrible assault, then it's natural
for many to assume that is the work of a single individual and nothing more organised is behind it.
It can also be taken for granted that from time-to-time, the UK security forces react to an unknown incident
like the Manchester bombing in order to see if such an organisation does exist and is embedded in the UK's
society. To do so, may lead investigators into the discovery of a network that has grown to a stage where a
country-wide campaign of violence could be implimented. An 'invasion' if you will.
For almost three years, the public were led to believe that a man -Salman Abedi, living with his family in the
Manchester area walked into the building where Ariana Grande was perfoming in front of a large audience
and detonated a bomb packed with bolts, nails and other material to inflict extreme harm on an unsuspecting
group of people.
The public -via the mainstream media, were also told that Salman Abedi may have discussed his plans with
his brother and by absence of reporting Salman's plans, we can suggest he agreed with the proposed act.
What is rarely mentioned is the frequent travelling back-and-forth from the UK to other countries by certain
ethnic groups and the ease that this is done. One would think that with this knowledge, places like sea-ports
and airports would obviously be kept up to speed with any unusual behavior or possible terror-cells developing
within the UK.
Regular travelling from a country to another for lengths of time also has an effect on currency, especially if
a family or group relies on Government-backed welfare and assistance in other ways of sustaining a decent
lifestyle.
Money that is casual in one country may be at a premium in another country and could be used for good or
sinister means with a more expanded potential in a realm where cash is sparse. But is that a healthy reason
that UK monies are transported out of the public domain without those who govern having concerns?
Surely this could be seen by some as giving the UK's wealth away to another country without consent from the
public and done under the guise of an assumption that particular ethnic families who live in the UK, live constantly
in the UK.
Put yourself in this position, if you were born and live in a country, why would you regulary visit another country?
To visit friends and relatives: Yes, but regular? It's costly and if you're relying on Government assistance to help
with rearing a family, wouldn't be prudent to use that money for that reason?
For religious reasons: Yes, but if you're so devout to your religion and it requires you to be in a partiular place to
perform the worship, why leave that sacred land?
I would suggest any act of regular travel from a wealthy country to a poorer country would have a negative effect
on the affluent one, whether the reasons are fair or dubious. Yet, nothing is done.
So unsuspecting people died in a hail of speeding bolts and nails. The malefactor died with his victims.
A Hearing was brought to discover what actually happened and why safety factors to avoid terrorism -something
that is becoming more-and-more a common concern these days, failed to foil the plot.
What is coming to light is that there's something more darker going on by some who abuse the freedom to travel
to a country in order to terrorise it. Morlocks and Eloi.
Quote:Manchester Arena Inquiry: Six wanted for questioning over bombingBBC:
'Six people are wanted for questioning by detectives investigating the Manchester Arena bombing, a legal document
has revealed. The parents of the brothers responsible for the atrocity are both suspects, as are two associates.
One of the associates, who was arrested following the attack, was able to flee the UK despite remaining a suspect
and being charged with other offences. Two further men are of interest to police but have not been spoken to.
Salman Abedi detonated the bomb at the end of an Ariana Grande concert on 22 May 2017, killing 22 people and
injuring many more. His younger brother Hashem Abedi, who was central to the conspiracy, was jailed this year after
being convicted of murdering all those who died.
The six names, which appear in a ruling published by the public inquiry into the attack, have not been disclosed publicly
before. The ruling followed an application by police to restrict publication of the information - it was successfully opposed
by the BBC and five other media organisations.
The media's position was supported by many bereaved families and opposed by none.
Quote:Images.
Top Left: Elyas Elmehdi was an associate of the Abedi brothers and this image from FaceBook
is seen as normal to UK security agencies?!
Top Right: Ramadan Abedi is the father of brothers Salman and Hashem. That's not Manchester
in the background and the image indicates it comes from Reuters. Reuters is not a security agency!
Bottom Left: Elyas Elmehdi fled to Libya despite being charged with drugs offences. And we know
why he was allowed to leave the UK, don't we. Political-correctness.
Bottom Right: Mohammed Soliman purchased bomb-making chemicals for the brothers.
Yes, bomb-making equipment available easily in any UK DIY store and bought by a Libyan who wasn't
on any Watch-List or had any affiliation with anyone tied to Libyan extremists.
Or at least, that's what we're led to believe.
'Four of the people are wanted as suspects. Two others are what are described as "trace/interview/eliminate subjects",
meaning that police wish to trace them, interview them and, if appropriate, eliminate them from their investigations.
Ramadan Abedi, father of Salman and Hashem Abedi, is wanted for questioning after his fingerprints were found inside
a car used by the brothers to store explosives and bomb-making material.
The vehicle - a Nissan Micra - was owned by the brothers for around 40 hours before they flew to Libya with their father
in April 2017. Ramadan has not returned to the UK since.
The car was purchased specifically to store the lethal material, which the two brothers had previously kept in a flat rented
in order to prepare their bomb.
While the suicide bomber Salman Abedi was in Libya, the car was parked outside the property of an associate called
Elyas Elmehdi, who is also one of the four outstanding suspects. On arrival back in the UK in May 2017, days before the
attack, Salman Abedi went straight to the car and later returned to collect material from it.
The BBC previously revealed that Elmehdi had fled to Libya despite being charged with drugs offences following his arrest
early in the arena bombing investigation.
The ruling reveals that, despite being released following questioning, he remained a suspect and that further evidence was
found to connect him to the Micra that contradicts what he said in interview.
Last year he was convicted in his absence of involvement in a drugs conspiracy and given a four year prison sentence.
Greater Manchester Police has not answered questions from the BBC about how Elmehdi was able to flee abroad - more
than a year after the bombing - despite being on bail for drugs offences. On what was supposed to be day one of Hashem
Abedi's trial in January, Elmehdi posted an image of himself online stating "they can tell you how I was restricted to doing bits"
alongside an emoji of two champagne glasses.
He later posted a photo of himself holding a firearm sitting on a vehicle bearing the logo of a military operation - involving various
militias - organised by the so-called "Government of National Accord" in Tripoli, which is battling other belligerents in the Libyan
civil war.
Police also want to speak to Samia Tabbal, the mother of Salman and Hashem Abedi. She too is in Libya.
Mohammed Soliman is the other suspect. He purchased a bomb-making chemical for the brothers, but left Manchester for Libya
in April 2017.
The two people that police want to trace are Majdi Alamari, who lives in Libya, and Anas Abuhdaima, whose location is unknown
but is believed to be somewhere in the UK.
BBC research suggests that Mr Abuhdaima, who is originally from Manchester, was in the city for a time after the bombing and that
he was convicted of a driving offence there in December 2017...'
See...? Everything involves travelling to other countries to not only avoid arrest, but to also take part in violence in other countries.
And they they all just cruise through Customs at airports without a single glance. Vehicles are bought, apartments are rented and
flight tickets are purchased to get to execute their plans.
Where did the money come from...? the UK?!
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.