Journalist Who Exposed Clinton Foundation Found Dead

[BIAD]

I think I asked in Shoutbox the other day...
Is there a list of the Clinton casualties compiled anywhere?
Even a running total?

I'd love to see it.

G

You should read the 'Snopes' version, it's a hoot!
When dealing in the murky waters of political persuasion, it's always best to put forth the rules that the
opposition is supposed to play by and Snopes does that up front.

So here's Snopes' opinion on how something allegedly innocuous will be reported by a conspiratorial
news-outlet. However, within their own set of supposedly-noble statutes, it's stated when -by the authorities
that when foul-play is ruled out... then there's nothing suspicious.

The Establishment Never Lies... say it to yourself once everyday.

You know, after a while... dishonesty can become the norm.

The Tin-Foil Hat Wearer's Rules:

*List every dead person with even the most tenuous of connections to your subject. It doesn’t matter how these people died,
or how tangential they were to your subject’s life. The longer the list, the more impressive it looks and the less likely anyone
is to challenge it.

By the time readers get to the bottom of the list, they’ll be too weary to wonder what could possibly be relevant about the
death of people such as Bill Clinton’s mother’s chiropractor.

*Play word games. Make sure every death is presented as “mysterious.” All accidental deaths are to be labelled “suspicious,”
even though by definition accidents occur when something unexpected goes wrong. Every self-inflicted death discussed must
include the phrase “ruled a suicide” to imply just the opposite.

When an autopsy contradicts a “mysterious death” theory, dispute it; when none was performed because none was needed,
claim that “no autopsy was allowed.” Make liberal use of words such as ‘allegedly’ and ‘supposedly’ to dismiss facts you can’t
support or contradict with hard evidence.

*Make sure every inconsistency or unexplained detail you can dredge up is offered as evidence of a conspiracy, no matter how
insignificant or pointless it may be. If an obvious suicide is discovered wearing only one shoe, ignore the physical evidence
of self-inflicted death and dwell on the missing shoe.

You don’t have to establish an alternate theory of the death; just keep harping that the missing shoe “can’t be explained.”

*If the data doesn’t fit your conclusion, ignore it.
You don’t have to explain why the people who claimed to have the most damaging goods on Clinton (e.g., Gennifer Flowers,
Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Linda Tripp, Monica Lewinsky, Kenneth Starr), are still walking around unscathed while dozens
of bit players have been bumped off. It’s inconvenient for you, so don’t mention it.

*Most important, don’t let facts and details stand in your way! If you can pass off a death by pneumonia as a “suicide,” do it!
If a cause of death contradicts your conspiracy theory, claim it was “never determined.” If your chronology of events is impossible,
who cares? It’s not like anybody is going to check up on this stuff …

If one... only one person can be connected to the Clintons and Murder Inc. then I'd suggest the
death of Vince Foster would at the very least, require further investigation.