Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Mentally Challenged
#1
This woman, Helen Reece, has done lost her last marble!  She thinks pedophiles should be allowed to adopt children and work with them in academic settings!



Quote:Rules which bar sex offenders from working with children are ‘unfair’ and even convicted paedophiles should have the right to adopt, a leading legal academic has said.

[Image: theresa_1763674c.jpg]
Theresa May was urged to allow sex offenders to adopt Photo: AFP

[Image: rosa-prince_2276059j.jpg]
By Rosa Prince, Political Correspondent
6:00AM GMT 15 Dec 2010
Follow

Helen Reece, a reader in law at the London School of Economics, called on Theresa May, the Home Secretary, to relax rules which automatically ban sex offenders from caring for children, saying that this could breach their human rights.

In an article in the respected Child and Family Law Quarterly, Miss Reece suggested that reoffending rates were not high among sex criminals, adding: “despite growing public concern over paedophilia, the numbers of child sex murders are very low.”

Very low?  Oh, okay. So that "low" number means as long as it's "low", it's okay?  Here's a thought... let's see if we can get it down to zero! 

Quote:A review is currently ongoing into the Vetting and Barring Scheme, introduced following the 2002 Soham murders, amid concerns by ministers that it is too heavy handed.

As well as banning certain offenders, the law currently requires adults coming into regular contact with children other than their own to be screened.

Mrs May ordered the review amid concerns about the vetting of ordinary volunteers such as parents who drive children to football practice and church flower arrangers.

In her article, Miss Reece suggested that the review should also introduce an assumption that sex offenders including child abusers posed no threat once they had served their sentence.


I've had some training in this area, and let me tell you, Bitch, once a sex offender, always a sex offender! Just because they served their sentence doesn't mean they are cured. They might fight the urge for a while, but eventually, they will give in. And YOU want to place the temptation right smack dab in front of them!  YOU STUPID IDIOT YOU!   minusculeredtantrum

Quote:She said: "There is no reason why all sex offenders should not be considered as potentially suitable to adopt or foster children, or work with them.

“The Vetting and Barring Scheme and other legislative measures single out sex offenders for unfair special treatment and they destroy the principle that a prisoner pays his or her debt by serving their sentence before re-entering society on equal terms.”

mediumfacepalm


Moving down the article a bit...

Quote:A Home Office spokesman said: “It is safe to say that the vetting review will not be considering allowing paedophiles to adopt. It wouldn’t exactly go down well with the public.

Well, hallelujah! Someone left in office that still has a brain cell that hasn't been affected by chemtrails and GMOs!  
A ray of hope shines through the darkness.
 
(Wanders off mumbling obscenities at that stupid bitch!)  

Read the full article here: Source


Messages In This Thread
The Mentally Challenged - by Mystic Wanderer - 09-18-2017, 08:17 PM
RE: The Mentally Challenged - by BIAD - 09-18-2017, 09:39 PM
RE: The Mentally Challenged - by Mystic Wanderer - 09-18-2017, 09:47 PM
RE: The Mentally Challenged - by BIAD - 09-18-2017, 09:54 PM
RE: The Mentally Challenged - by Daitengu - 09-19-2017, 02:26 AM
RE: The Mentally Challenged - by gordi - 09-19-2017, 09:53 AM
RE: The Mentally Challenged - by BIAD - 09-19-2017, 11:21 AM
RE: The Mentally Challenged - by gordi - 09-19-2017, 03:03 PM
RE: The Mentally Challenged - by Wallfire - 09-19-2017, 04:29 PM
RE: The Mentally Challenged - by BIAD - 09-19-2017, 06:42 PM
RE: The Mentally Challenged - by Wallfire - 09-19-2017, 07:12 PM
RE: The Mentally Challenged - by BIAD - 09-19-2017, 07:42 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)