Congress classifies 'unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena' UFOs as not man-made

[BIAD]

Here's what I'm getting at: (From The Hill)

Congress implies UFOs have non-human origins

'In Congress, where legislation is drafted, debated and enacted, clear and concise definitions are of paramount importance...'

So we can accept the notion that solid evidence will be shown in this article, along with 'clear and concise definitions'.

'...As military aircrews increasingly encounter unidentified flying objects (UFOs), lawmakers recently made several striking
revisions to the definition of “UFO.” Key among them: The explosive implication that some UFOs have non-human origins...'

Now we have Congress' implication' -not a clear and concise definition of a result they've arrived at after reviewing presented
evidence by official bodies. Remember, the title tells the reader that Congress 'implied', alluded to, inferred. It means that
after discussing the matter, they are not sure where these objects come from and The Hill is merely simmering the buzzwords
to hold the reader's attention.

'As first reported by researcher Douglas Johnson, a draft bill approved unanimously by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
rebrands UFOs as “unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena.” Expanding the definition to include objects in space and under
the oceans significantly broadens the scope of a muscular new office tasked by Congress with investigating UFOs.

The revised definition of “UFO” also includes “transmedium” objects which, according to lawmakers, “transition between space and
the atmosphere, or between the atmosphere and bodies of water.”...'

According to lawmakers... not according to an investigation from viable researchers and scientific agencies interested in the matter
of off-world craft invading airspace and other aspects of our planet.

'In short, members of a key national security-focused committee believe that objects of unknown origin are demonstrating remarkably
advanced technology by moving seamlessly between space, air and water. A report accompanying the legislation notes that “transmedium
threats to United States national security are expanding exponentially.”

It strains credulity to believe that lawmakers would include such extraordinary language in public legislation without compelling evidence.
Perhaps members have seen the classified sensor data that prompted former President Trump’s director of national intelligence to state
that UFOs exhibit “technologies that we don’t have [and] that we are not capable of defending against” (among several other eyebrow-raising
comments)...'

Here we have members of a committee arriving at the same conclusion as those in the past and present came to, along with a swipe
at a former President. Is the manoeuvrability of these objects through certain natural states as important as the question of what they
are and where they come from? At this point, The Hill hasn't addressed that question because -like Congress, they can't.

'Most strikingly, Congress’s new definition of “UFO” excludes “man-made” objects.

Over the last seven decades, most UFO sightings involved “man-made” objects, such as misidentified aircraft, balloons, satellites or drones.
Yet now, according to Congress, “man-made” objects “should not be considered under the definition as unidentified aerospace-undersea
phenomena.” Moreover, in a congressional directive, objects identified by the new UFO office “as man-made…will be passed to appropriate
[Department of Defense and Intelligence Community] offices” for further analysis.

Congress, in short, is forcing the government to focus on objects that are not “man-made.”...'

Here we have The Hill and Congress announcing to the public that past 'secret' projects were to blame for confusing sightings and now,
all that research as stopped. Unless, this classified work is still going on and the public will be given a binder explaining which light in
the sky is which.

Finally, the current trend in word-juggling surfaces. Ask the adult reader to imagine, envision something that has nothing to do with
off-world vehicles visiting our airspace. We're back to man-made drones.

'...Imagine that the new UFO office identifies a highly advanced drone flying in sensitive airspace. Under the draft legislation, regardless
of the drone’s origin – be it Chinese, Russian or otherwise – the UFO office must immediately stop investigating and hand the case over
to another government entity...'

And then the old switcheroo.

'This implies that members of the Senate Intelligence Committee believe (on a unanimous, bipartisan basis) that some UFOs have
non-human origins. After all, why would Congress establish and task a powerful new office with investigating non-“man-made” UFOs
if such objects did not exist?

Make no mistake: One branch of the American government implying that UFOs have non-human origins is an explosive development.
It is also part of a remarkable shift in official attitudes towards UFOs...'

How? I'm not saying that Ufos don't have non-human origins, but a UFO office arriving at the conclusion that something isn't a drone
doesn't automatically mean it's an object is from another planet!

'In the late 1940s and early 1950s, many senior government officials believed that UFOs had “interplanetary” origins. But a series of
still-unexplained encounters in the summer of 1952 sparked Cold War national security fears among defense and intelligence agencies.
As a result, the U.S. government initiated a campaign to “debunk” and discredit all UFO sightings, no matter how credible.
For decades, officials mocked any suggestion that UFOs had extraterrestrial origins. Not anymore...'

Oh... so they've stopped lying to those who pay their salaries, that's nice.

The rest of the article is name-dropping to imply a seriousness to the subject and a couple of them are ex-CIA people.
Thank heavens the deceiving has stopped.