'Google Declares War On Alternative Media: Plans To Punish “False News”
By Halting Ad Revenue'
'Google has decided to make itself the arbiter of what is “true” and what is “false,” placing
alternative media in the cross-hairs of its war on free speech and the free flow of information.
Since the US Election’s “surprise” outcome, supporters of Hillary Clinton have been searching
for who and what to blame.
One of the more bizarre theories circulating has been that Google, Twitter, and Facebook, who
WikiLeaks revealed were actually colluding with Clinton’s campaign to get her elected, were to
blame for distributing “fake” and “false” news that painted Clinton in a bad light and “unduly”
influenced public opinion against her...'
That'll be the WikiLeaks information that the mainstream media never went near and by doing so,
prohibited those who believe in the usual conduits of news from seeing what Hillary Clinton had
and her Foundation had been up to.
The 'bizarre theories' expression and word 'revealed' tend to not go together as the first one is a
claim of ludicrous or ridiculous and the second word is the opposite of hidden. To reveal is the
act of exposing and confession, it implies honour and honesty.
But please, let's not get bogged-down with semantics!
'...In order to take the heat off of themselves, Google and Facebook have now announced measures
that will target so-called “fake news” on the internet by cutting off how the writers of such content make
money – advertising....'
No, in my opinion, I think that if these claims were so 'bizarre' -and ergo dubious, why would major
internet companies concern themselves immediately after an election in a first-world country?
Was Donald Trump asked about this...? This piece has only mentioned Hllary Clinton's followers
concerns, is the worry of bizarre theories coming from her camp or Google's?
I would suggest that Google and Facebook wish to stifle free thought and access to information that the
Elite seem to not wish in the public domain. 'Fake' News is fake news, it mis-represents truth, it doesn't
hide information or prevent the viewer/reader from searching for alternative opinions.
'...Google sets due to the most damage to alternative news content creators as its AdSense advertising
network...'
I have no idea what the above sentence means.
'...AdSense allows advertisers to place text ads on millions of websites that are a part of its network
and is a major source of money for many publishers. In the wake of last week’s election, Google is now
working on a policy change that would prevent websites that Google deems “false” or “misleading”
from using AdSense.
Google has long had rules for AdSense, such as barring ads from appearing next to pornographic or
violent content. It uses a combination of human and artificial intelligence to comb through sites’ content,
with the artificial intelligence learning from sites removed from the program, making the process faster
and more efficient.
Essentially, Google is hoping to starve websites that don’t fit the mainstream media’s “truthful” narrative...'
Mintpress News
Yep...! Hillary and her wealthy cronies didn't get their global agenda to work in the States, so they've
decided to nudge their establishment internet buddies and get them to gag those who oppose them
on a medium that covers the world.
A 'Fake News' claim now blanket for any website that they deem dubious. Bye-bye flying saucers then?
By Halting Ad Revenue'
'Google has decided to make itself the arbiter of what is “true” and what is “false,” placing
alternative media in the cross-hairs of its war on free speech and the free flow of information.
Since the US Election’s “surprise” outcome, supporters of Hillary Clinton have been searching
for who and what to blame.
One of the more bizarre theories circulating has been that Google, Twitter, and Facebook, who
WikiLeaks revealed were actually colluding with Clinton’s campaign to get her elected, were to
blame for distributing “fake” and “false” news that painted Clinton in a bad light and “unduly”
influenced public opinion against her...'
That'll be the WikiLeaks information that the mainstream media never went near and by doing so,
prohibited those who believe in the usual conduits of news from seeing what Hillary Clinton had
and her Foundation had been up to.
The 'bizarre theories' expression and word 'revealed' tend to not go together as the first one is a
claim of ludicrous or ridiculous and the second word is the opposite of hidden. To reveal is the
act of exposing and confession, it implies honour and honesty.
But please, let's not get bogged-down with semantics!
'...In order to take the heat off of themselves, Google and Facebook have now announced measures
that will target so-called “fake news” on the internet by cutting off how the writers of such content make
money – advertising....'
No, in my opinion, I think that if these claims were so 'bizarre' -and ergo dubious, why would major
internet companies concern themselves immediately after an election in a first-world country?
Was Donald Trump asked about this...? This piece has only mentioned Hllary Clinton's followers
concerns, is the worry of bizarre theories coming from her camp or Google's?
I would suggest that Google and Facebook wish to stifle free thought and access to information that the
Elite seem to not wish in the public domain. 'Fake' News is fake news, it mis-represents truth, it doesn't
hide information or prevent the viewer/reader from searching for alternative opinions.
'...Google sets due to the most damage to alternative news content creators as its AdSense advertising
network...'
I have no idea what the above sentence means.
'...AdSense allows advertisers to place text ads on millions of websites that are a part of its network
and is a major source of money for many publishers. In the wake of last week’s election, Google is now
working on a policy change that would prevent websites that Google deems “false” or “misleading”
from using AdSense.
Google has long had rules for AdSense, such as barring ads from appearing next to pornographic or
violent content. It uses a combination of human and artificial intelligence to comb through sites’ content,
with the artificial intelligence learning from sites removed from the program, making the process faster
and more efficient.
Essentially, Google is hoping to starve websites that don’t fit the mainstream media’s “truthful” narrative...'
Mintpress News
Yep...! Hillary and her wealthy cronies didn't get their global agenda to work in the States, so they've
decided to nudge their establishment internet buddies and get them to gag those who oppose them
on a medium that covers the world.
A 'Fake News' claim now blanket for any website that they deem dubious. Bye-bye flying saucers then?
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.