12-26-2021, 02:25 PM
That seems fairly conclusive, esp. when you combine that with other facts from other sources.
The thing is, how do you explain something like this to someone else who hasn't done any of this research? You can state the basics of the study and tell them the figures, but unless they go to the source links and read it for themselves, your just wasting your breath.
I was talking to my step dad yesterday that I will likely be loosing my job in a week or two by not complying with the vaxx mandates. He suggested that the vaxx is safe based on the health of people he knew personally that got the jab and that I should do my research based on local data I personally collect, not stuff from these other sources.
It bothered him I was willing to get fired as a conscientious objector with regard to the mandatory "vaccines" he felt did no harm. I had a hard time trying to explain all the different ways this whole deal stinks and ended up emphasizing the problem as "wrongful termination based on medical discrimination" and that it was just as bad as asking if I was HIV positive or if I needed to pass a weekly STD test for the big three STDS by getting a swab placed up my pee pee. I also had to point out that people in other countries were being placed in camps for non-compliance and it was headed down a Nazi path that had to be stopped.
I don't think he really understood what hill I was putting my flag on while defending my individual rights, so I tossed in some religious exemption ideas in the mix too, but he still doesn't get it. So many people I know have just gone with the vax program with zero information or informed consent and have no knowledge of anything about this virus (like spike proteins for example). You can't explain any of this to these uninformed people without getting a blank stare and the feeling that they think you're a nutter conspiracy theorist anti-vaxxer.
The thing is, how do you explain something like this to someone else who hasn't done any of this research? You can state the basics of the study and tell them the figures, but unless they go to the source links and read it for themselves, your just wasting your breath.
I was talking to my step dad yesterday that I will likely be loosing my job in a week or two by not complying with the vaxx mandates. He suggested that the vaxx is safe based on the health of people he knew personally that got the jab and that I should do my research based on local data I personally collect, not stuff from these other sources.
It bothered him I was willing to get fired as a conscientious objector with regard to the mandatory "vaccines" he felt did no harm. I had a hard time trying to explain all the different ways this whole deal stinks and ended up emphasizing the problem as "wrongful termination based on medical discrimination" and that it was just as bad as asking if I was HIV positive or if I needed to pass a weekly STD test for the big three STDS by getting a swab placed up my pee pee. I also had to point out that people in other countries were being placed in camps for non-compliance and it was headed down a Nazi path that had to be stopped.
I don't think he really understood what hill I was putting my flag on while defending my individual rights, so I tossed in some religious exemption ideas in the mix too, but he still doesn't get it. So many people I know have just gone with the vax program with zero information or informed consent and have no knowledge of anything about this virus (like spike proteins for example). You can't explain any of this to these uninformed people without getting a blank stare and the feeling that they think you're a nutter conspiracy theorist anti-vaxxer.