(12-15-2021, 06:36 PM)NightskyeB4Dawn Wrote: They don't want us to think. If we do that, we may start putting two an two together.
I found this other video very interesting.
Since natural immunity is expected after recovery from a virus, I don't know why they would think that the Omicron variant is superior in creating natural immunity, while ignoring the natural immunity from the original virus and its other variants.
Unless it is because the Omicron variants has around 32 different variant spikes, making it the super one size fits all virus, that is much milder, much easier to catch, and few people die from it.
Or maybe because it was deliberately introduced to infect all those pesky, stiff necked unvaccinated folk.
Just a thought.
Apparently Pfizer just released it's vaccine death evaluation pursuant to a court order. Grace told me about it. According to that report, the vaccine death rate is only marginally lower than the pre-vaccine death rate from covid itself, so why bother with it? Now, they don't want us thinking enough to make that comparison, but they REALLY don't want us to think about how those numbers were skewed over time - i.e. die in a car wreck, but test positive for the virus = covid death, but die from the vaccine, and watch that death mysteriously disappear from VAERS. So covid deaths are artificially inflated while vax deaths are simultaneously artificially depressed... and they could STILL only make the vax death rate marginally better, even with all that fun with numbers! The real numbers would likely horrify everyone, and raise calls for new Nuremburg Trials.
Grace also told me that they are now saying that catching the virus, but being asypmtomatic (as both of us apparently were), does not confer any immunity on that individual - DUH! If you are asypmtomatic, you already have a natural immunity, and the virus is just hitching a free ride in a dry well - so WHY would a virus MAKE someone immune who was ALREADY immune? That's the part they are not pointing out, and that they don't want us thinking too deeply about, lest we have reason to refuse their money-making jabs!
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’