NESSIE is BACK!

[BIAD]

Well damn   look`s like it was not then "the nessie" but  digitally created fake nessie ? Or what is the final verdict ?

I'm sorry to say that the jury is leaning quite heavily towards it being a photo of toy plesiosaur digitally inserted into video (twice) to get more clicks for charity video, but it may not yet be 100%... I'm waiting to hear replies from the rest of the guys first!

G

Thanks for the red-canoe image, I just couldn't grab it with my laptop!
But sure enough, as the TOS member said, there's the red canoe and there's the disturbance in the water nearby!



In regards of @Kenzo's query, I don't think it was an intentional fake generated by the YouTuber.
The charity-click connection isn't the best of optics and the signals it sends in fooling the public could have repercussions
on their donations. I mean, what else are they up to in the world of deceit? -that sort of thing.

Richard Maver -the Youtuber, has put too much work into his hobbies and being a commercial pilot.. again, bad optics.

I can make the toy Plesiosaur work to fit the shape in the original location claim, but I'm struggling to accept that
the outdoors-man and professional pilot would screw up his standing with those who took part in the charity canoeing,
his YouTube subscribers and the Alzheimer's society.