Big bad changes for the world net

[Ninurta]

https://www.technocracy.news/technocracy...al-safety/

It made a big splash last year with its highly touted “Great Reset,” which promises to use the pandemic as an “opportunity” to crash the world’s dollar-based, capitalist economic system and “build back better” under a more socialist and globally integrated system that mirrors the United Nations Agenda 2030 goals for Sustainable Development.

Any politician you hear using the term “build back better” [Biden-Harris-Trudeau-Johnson repeat this mantra daily] you know has drunk the poisonous Kool-Aid of the World Economic Forum and its founder, Klaus Schwab 

An exceptionally good explanation of what the overused phrase "build back better" REALLY means!

The WEF sets itself up as the global arbiter that defines terms like “harmful content” and “misinformation.” It also laments the fact that encrypted social media channels like Telegram and Signal are able to allow users to communicate free of censorship and spying.

I think I detect another assault on encryption coming... they hate encryption, because they can't get into YOUR shit if you use it properly.

2. Address Balance of Privacy and Safety: Share best practices on addressing the growing tension between privacy and safety as harmful content on encrypted channels risks evading detection

Yup, no doubt about it. Encryption is going to come under fire again.

3. Market Competition: Drive better alignment between regulations focused on safety and competition to foster market innovation and enable consumer choice

AHA! That answers a question I had the other day about those creepy Facebook commercials they've been showing on TV here with a bunch of kids promoting "updating internet regulations". It made no sense for Facebook to call for more regulation, which could bite Facebook in the ass, but what they want it appears is regulations THEY write to institute censorship on free speech.

Imagine that.

BUT - if all the information you get is controlled, and you are therefore not getting ALL of the information, how are you supposed to make an INFORMED "consumer choice"? That section translates into English as "you will buy what we tell you to buy, and we will rake in your money like bandits". But hey, these are the same people who are telling us "you will own nothing and be happy"... so, if we own nothing, what else are we going to spend our money on other than what they tell us to spend it on?

4. Cross-Jurisdictional Content Cooperation: Enable action on content that spans jurisdictions and requires greater coordination amongst countries (e.g. content created in one county but causing harm in another)

Oh, but wait - there's more! Since we only have to obey law in the country we happen to be in at the time, they want to fix that little problem. My bet is that they will try to standardize laws to the least common denominator across all national lines, creating a defacto one world society. The least common denominator means the most restrictive laws, so we would all be bound to follow, for example, CCP laws wherever we are in the world, or Venezuelan law, or Cuban law... you get the drift here.

5. Definitional Alignment: Support work on consistent definitions for content categories, such as self-harm and cyber-bullying to enable standardized enforcement, reporting, and measurement across regions.

If COVID taught us anything, it’s that Big Tech social-media platforms, in league with global power elites, defined for us what is allowed and not allowed to be said on the Internet.

There it is again... "standardized enforcement, reporting, and measurement across regions". That means enforcement of CCP law in Washington DC, Bristol England, and St Petersburg Russia, just to name a few of the points on Earth. All other points on Earth would also necessarily fall under CCP law as well, every single square millimeter of the Earth's surface.

No thanks. They can take their internet and cram it up their asses if that's the way they want to go. I lived a very long time without the internet, without it ever even being a thing at all. I can do it again, no problem.

Things like this are why I recommend two things: hard copy books, and downloading all the digital information you can while you still CAN. It's entirely possible for them to prevent Thought Criminals from accessing the information on teh internet, but they can't do anything with what you already have in hand. Especially if you encrypt it. And make multiple backup copies for safekeeping and disperse them to various other locations.

Piss on them AND their "better" build-back.

.