The Time.com outlet offers this, the reasons why Donald Trump lost the 2021 election and how the Biden organisation
rallied together to alter 'the rules' to save the voters from themselves.
It's truly unbelievable and in three parts.
Part1.
rallied together to alter 'the rules' to save the voters from themselves.
It's truly unbelievable and in three parts.
Part1.
Quote:
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
'A weird thing happened right after the Nov. 3 election: nothing.
The nation was braced for chaos. Liberal groups had vowed to take to the streets, planning hundreds of protests across the country.
Right-wing militias were girding for battle. In a poll before Election Day, 75% of Americans voiced concern about violence.
Instead, an eerie quiet descended. As President Trump refused to concede, the response was not mass action but crickets.
When media organizations called the race for Joe Biden on Nov. 7, jubilation broke out instead, as people thronged cities across the
U.S. to celebrate the democratic process that resulted in Trump’s ouster.
A second odd thing happened amid Trump’s attempts to reverse the result: corporate America turned on him.
Hundreds of major business leaders, many of whom had backed Trump’s candidacy and supported his policies, called on him to concede.
To the President, something felt amiss. “It was all very, very strange,” Trump said on Dec. 2.
“Within days after the election, we witnessed an orchestrated effort to anoint the winner, even while many key states were still being
counted.” In a way, Trump was right.
There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs.
Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans. The pact was formalized in a terse,
little-noticed joint statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO published on Election Day.
Both sides would come to see it as a sort of implicit bargain–inspired by the summer’s massive, sometimes destructive racial-justice
protests–in which the forces of labor came together with the forces of capital to keep the peace and oppose Trump’s assault on democracy.
The handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election
–an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted.
For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions as they came under
simultaneous attack from a remorseless pandemic and an autocratically inclined President. Though much of this activity took place
on the left, it was separate from the Biden campaign and crossed ideological lines, with crucial contributions by nonpartisan and
conservative actors.
The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a Trump victory. It was an election so calamitous that no result
could be discerned at all, a failure of the central act of democratic self-governance that has been a hallmark of America since its founding.
Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions
in public and private funding. They fended off voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote
by mail for the first time.
They successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight
viral smears. They executed national public-awareness campaigns that helped Americans understand how the vote count would unfold
over days or weeks, preventing Trump’s conspiracy theories and false claims of victory from getting more traction.
After Election Day, they monitored every pressure point to ensure that Trump could not overturn the result. “The untold story of the election
is the thousands of people of both parties who accomplished the triumph of American democracy at its very foundation,” says Norm Eisen,
a prominent lawyer and former Obama Administration official who recruited Republicans and Democrats to the board of the Voter Protection Program.
For Trump and his allies were running their own campaign to spoil the election.
The President spent months insisting that mail ballots were a Democratic plot and the election would be “rigged.”
His henchmen at the state level sought to block their use, while his lawyers brought dozens of spurious suits to make it more difficult to
vote–an intensification of the GOP’s legacy of suppressive tactics. Before the election, Trump plotted to block a legitimate vote count.
And he spent the months following Nov. 3 trying to steal the election he’d lost–with lawsuits and conspiracy theories, pressure on state
and local officials, and finally summoning his army of supporters to the Jan. 6 rally that ended in deadly violence at the Capitol.
The democracy campaigners watched with alarm. “Every week, we felt like we were in a struggle to try to pull off this election without the
country going through a real dangerous moment of unraveling,” says former GOP Representative Zach Wamp, a Trump supporter who
helped coordinate a bipartisan election-protection council.
“We can look back and say this thing went pretty well, but it was not at all clear in September and October that that was going to be the case.”
This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election, based on access to the group’s inner workings, never-before-seen
documents and interviews with dozens of those involved from across the political spectrum. It is the story of an unprecedented, creative
and determined campaign whose success also reveals how close the nation came to disaster.
“Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,” says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy,
a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. “But it’s massively important for the country to understand that it didn’t happen accidentally.
The system didn’t work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.”
That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well
-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions,
change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.
They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order
to ensure that democracy in America endures.
THE ARCHITECT
Sometime in the fall of 2019, Mike Podhorzer became convinced the election was headed for disaster–and determined to protect it.
This was not his usual purview. For nearly a quarter-century, Podhorzer, senior adviser to the president of the AFL-CIO, the nation’s largest
union federation, has marshaled the latest tactics and data to help its favored candidates win elections.
Unassuming and professorial, he isn’t the sort of hair-gelled “political strategist” who shows up on cable news.
Among Democratic insiders, he’s known as the wizard behind some of the biggest advances in political technology in recent decades.
A group of liberal strategists he brought together in the early 2000s led to the creation of the Analyst Institute, a secretive firm that
applies scientific methods to political campaigns. He was also involved in the founding of Catalist, the flagship progressive data company.
The endless chatter in Washington about “political strategy,” Podhorzer believes, has little to do with how change really gets made.
“My basic take on politics is that it’s all pretty obvious if you don’t overthink it or swallow the prevailing frameworks whole,” he once wrote.
“After that, just relentlessly identify your assumptions and challenge them.” Podhorzer applies that approach to everything: when he coached
his now adult son’s Little League team in the D.C. suburbs, he trained the boys not to swing at most pitches–a tactic that infuriated both their
and their opponents’ parents, but won the team a series of championships.
Trump’s election in 2016–credited in part to his unusual strength among the sort of blue collar white voters who once dominated the
AFL-CIO –prompted Podhorzer to question his assumptions about voter behavior. He began circulating weekly number-crunching memos
to a small circle of allies and hosting strategy sessions in D.C. But when he began to worry about the election itself, he didn’t want to seem paranoid.
It was only after months of research that he introduced his concerns in his newsletter in October 2019. The usual tools of data, analytics
and polling would not be sufficient in a situation where the President himself was trying to disrupt the election, he wrote.
“Most of our planning takes us through Election Day,” he noted.
“But, we are not prepared for the two most likely outcomes”–Trump losing and refusing to concede, and Trump winning the Electoral
College (despite losing the popular vote) by corrupting the voting process in key states.
“We desperately need to systematically ‘red-team’ this election so that we can anticipate and plan for the worst we know will be coming
our way.” It turned out Podhorzer wasn’t the only one thinking in these terms. He began to hear from others eager to join forces.
The Fight Back Table, a coalition of “resistance” organizations, had begun scenario-planning around the potential for a contested election,
gathering liberal activists at the local and national level into what they called the Democracy Defense Coalition.
Voting-rights and civil rights organizations were raising alarms. A group of former elected officials was researching emergency powers they
feared Trump might exploit. Protect Democracy was assembling a bipartisan election-crisis task force. “It turned out that once you said it
out loud, people agreed,” Podhorzer says, “and it started building momentum.”
He spent months pondering scenarios and talking to experts. It wasn’t hard to find liberals who saw Trump as a dangerous dictator, but
Podhorzer was careful to steer clear of hysteria. What he wanted to know was not how American democracy was dying but how it might
be kept alive.
The chief difference between the U.S. and countries that lost their grip on democracy, he concluded, was that America’s decentralized
election system couldn’t be rigged in one fell swoop. That presented an opportunity to shore it up...
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.