08-15-2020, 11:45 AM
Here is a link to an article that carries the title: Australian newspaper cartoon of U.S. candidates Harris and Biden criticized as racist
The article talks about a cartoon that is supposedly described as racist but NOWHERE in this article does it show the cartoon in question.
No, instead, there are a panoplies of videos showing Trump "attacking" Harris.
Why not name this article Trump attacks Harris then ?
Why make an article about a "racist cartoon" but put videos of Trump right after the headline AND before the article?
Sleigh of hand to alter your opinion. Period. Shameless fucks. (And I am not a Trump supporter)
Here is the link from that sleigh of hand article: Australian newspaper cartoon of U.S. candidates Harris and Biden criticized as racist
And here is the cartoon in question that Reuters "forgot" to put in their article:
See, I don't give a rat's ass if you're a Democrat or a Republican but this is the type of Media pushing an agenda the wrong way.
Hypocritical bastards.
.
The article talks about a cartoon that is supposedly described as racist but NOWHERE in this article does it show the cartoon in question.
No, instead, there are a panoplies of videos showing Trump "attacking" Harris.
Why not name this article Trump attacks Harris then ?
Why make an article about a "racist cartoon" but put videos of Trump right after the headline AND before the article?
Sleigh of hand to alter your opinion. Period. Shameless fucks. (And I am not a Trump supporter)
Here is the link from that sleigh of hand article: Australian newspaper cartoon of U.S. candidates Harris and Biden criticized as racist
And here is the cartoon in question that Reuters "forgot" to put in their article:
See, I don't give a rat's ass if you're a Democrat or a Republican but this is the type of Media pushing an agenda the wrong way.
Hypocritical bastards.
.
~ Today is the youngest you'll ever be again ~