If they're ours, what use are they on this planet...? What's in it for those who have created these things?
Trust in Governments would be lost if it emerges these fantastic craft have been kept from the public for
so long. Think emergencies like famine and many wide-range disasters, such speeding vehicles could provide
instant assistance.
Hell... think what voters would do if they realised their four-year-old girl in a road accident or ancient grandmother
could have been on the operating table seconds after the situation. This realisation could also include the pilots of
such vehicles.
Then there'd be no use in electing a leader if the reality is that the information regarding 'flying saucers' is on a
need-to-know basis. And if such elected leaders do know, what sort of shit is he or she that they don't confide in
their loved-ones?!
Ever?
The security agencies can't know if UFOs belong to their own or other countries. Spies and informants would
have disclosed the secret by now and at some point, solid evidence would've have spilled out to the public.
Maybe this quandary has already been realised and 'The Academy To The Stars' was created to muddy the waters.
The CIA: "Yes, we were involved in all the UFO sightings in the past, but now we're being honest"
Give me a break!
Compartmentalisation is often cited as a reason for those working on this project not knowing the bigger picture.
Segregation works in a unit, but it's costly and can fail easily when those in technologies combine on a particular
theme.
Unmarried and compromised people are ideal for such work, but trust comes in many forms and for what...?
A centuries-old technology that has only alleged peripheral fallout in the outside world? Lieutenant Colonel Philip
Corso reckoned the public gained Kevlar and fibre-optics from the Roswell crash, yet he only told us via a book,
a book you have to buy!
The goal of profit can't be on the cards for the massive military and private company environs.
Commercial flight has basically remained the same since the day of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. These objects don't
rely on lift and other earthly aerodynamic forces, so the next passenger craft -if researched and funded for money,
is long overdue.
Other military use. It's rational that an elusive -almost indestructible, vehicle could be used only times of conflict.
But surely the awesome aerial capabilities would've been emulated by other countries by now? The same US
military couldn't keep Klaus Fuchs from sending his Soviet friends certain atomic secrets.
Let's pretend the US has the sole technology on these UFOs, they would obviously deny any connection to
them to both friend and foe. Do you think other countries would leave it at that?! It's fortuitous that these UFOs
keep crashing in remote Western-world locations, isn't it?!
My humble opinion is that we -that's all of us, don't know how they work because the rules of their propulsion
derive from another paradigm. The manoeuvring-capabilities could be possible because of the natural laws of
their origins are different from ours.
I also propose that if these craft are not from Earth, there's no guarantee that they're actually moving.
It could be that our surroundings give the impression that they are speeding about when instead, our environment
is merely penetrated and we're seeing an effect that we don't understand yet.
.....................................
I will not poo-poo the idea of UFOs, I've seen them and they weren't lights in the sky or vague shapes in a
cloudless sky. But if they're ours, it's helluva waste of money and manpower flying them about on seventy-year
testing programs.
Trust in Governments would be lost if it emerges these fantastic craft have been kept from the public for
so long. Think emergencies like famine and many wide-range disasters, such speeding vehicles could provide
instant assistance.
Hell... think what voters would do if they realised their four-year-old girl in a road accident or ancient grandmother
could have been on the operating table seconds after the situation. This realisation could also include the pilots of
such vehicles.
Then there'd be no use in electing a leader if the reality is that the information regarding 'flying saucers' is on a
need-to-know basis. And if such elected leaders do know, what sort of shit is he or she that they don't confide in
their loved-ones?!
Ever?
The security agencies can't know if UFOs belong to their own or other countries. Spies and informants would
have disclosed the secret by now and at some point, solid evidence would've have spilled out to the public.
Maybe this quandary has already been realised and 'The Academy To The Stars' was created to muddy the waters.
The CIA: "Yes, we were involved in all the UFO sightings in the past, but now we're being honest"
Give me a break!
Compartmentalisation is often cited as a reason for those working on this project not knowing the bigger picture.
Segregation works in a unit, but it's costly and can fail easily when those in technologies combine on a particular
theme.
Unmarried and compromised people are ideal for such work, but trust comes in many forms and for what...?
A centuries-old technology that has only alleged peripheral fallout in the outside world? Lieutenant Colonel Philip
Corso reckoned the public gained Kevlar and fibre-optics from the Roswell crash, yet he only told us via a book,
a book you have to buy!
The goal of profit can't be on the cards for the massive military and private company environs.
Commercial flight has basically remained the same since the day of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. These objects don't
rely on lift and other earthly aerodynamic forces, so the next passenger craft -if researched and funded for money,
is long overdue.
Other military use. It's rational that an elusive -almost indestructible, vehicle could be used only times of conflict.
But surely the awesome aerial capabilities would've been emulated by other countries by now? The same US
military couldn't keep Klaus Fuchs from sending his Soviet friends certain atomic secrets.
Let's pretend the US has the sole technology on these UFOs, they would obviously deny any connection to
them to both friend and foe. Do you think other countries would leave it at that?! It's fortuitous that these UFOs
keep crashing in remote Western-world locations, isn't it?!
My humble opinion is that we -that's all of us, don't know how they work because the rules of their propulsion
derive from another paradigm. The manoeuvring-capabilities could be possible because of the natural laws of
their origins are different from ours.
I also propose that if these craft are not from Earth, there's no guarantee that they're actually moving.
It could be that our surroundings give the impression that they are speeding about when instead, our environment
is merely penetrated and we're seeing an effect that we don't understand yet.
.....................................
I will not poo-poo the idea of UFOs, I've seen them and they weren't lights in the sky or vague shapes in a
cloudless sky. But if they're ours, it's helluva waste of money and manpower flying them about on seventy-year
testing programs.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.