(12-07-2019, 06:20 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote:Quote:3656
Democrats Want a Disarmed American Populace That They Can Control
Q!!Hs1Jq13jV6 7 Dec 2019 - 11:57:38 AM
https://twitter.com/KingstonChurch3/stat...1542520832?
What happens when people don't conform to their rule?
What happens when people cannot defend themselves?
Why do [D]'s want to abolish the 2nd amendment?
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
What did the Framers of the Constitution fear the most?
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/d...transcript?
"–That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–"
We, the People.
Q
"Q" is wrong there. He says "Why do [D]'s want to abolish the 2nd amendment?". The answer is: THEY DON'T. This is not a Democrat initiative. It's a socialist/communist initiative. They are placing a (D) beside their names, but they are NOT Democrats, they are only using that party to gain enough power to declare themselves. The resolution here has Democrats on board right beside the Republicans, both telling the Richmond socialists to go pound salt up their asses. I do not know any Democrats willing to give up their firearms, either.
This is not a Republican vs. Democrat issue. It's a Free Citizen vs. Totalitarian regime issue. Insinuating that "them Democrats wants to take yer GUNS!" is just another way to promote further division among the masses in a "divide and conquer" strategy. We cannot allow that to happen, we cannot allow the enemy to define the narrative, for if we do, they will engineer it to their own ends, and to our ruin.
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’