Now here's a tip to anyone in the Establishment who needs assistance on shutting down a scandal.
Subtlety is usually a prerequisite when dealing with a taboo-activity and the news-hungry press, but if the
story you're trying to get out from under of has public passion and other information waiting to be exposed,
sometimes it's best to cry out the words that 'those-with-ears-to-listen' will rally to your side immediately.
Remember, Prince Andrew's interview was made at the BBC and broadcast on a Saturday evening at
9.00.pm. and on BBC 2, a lesser-used channel at that particular time. And of course, who funds the BBC?!
And so the man who's ex-wife took £15,000 from Epstein for debt problems, made the call and see if you
can spot the words. It's no accident that the BBC piece left what Prince Andrew said was his alibi until further
down to article. They had to because -like most news outlets, they believe readers only scan the headline
and possibly the first paragraph.
But they knew what he was saying and they knew that it was too direct.
Here we go.
Up to now, all fairly normal. We don't know who wrote this as the usual Journalist's name is missing under the title,
but you can bet it was heavily edited and checked. Of course, the interview itself was a milktoast formula and real
probing was never even contemplated.
"Unaware of an arrest warrant"..? Do you have any idea the vetting-procedures that goes on just to hold an actual
interview away from a secured area for the Windsors?! And as far as a 'mental health issue' is concerned, the same
broadcasters have had no problems with boasting the military careers of the Royals and their supposed-front-line
activity in conflicts.
But Prince Andrew is playing the victim card and BBC Newsnight host Emily Maitlis is letting him use it.
There it is, there's the call. 'Woking' [pronounced woke-king] and Pizza Express. Anyone from Prince Andrew's many
advisers and those of the BBC with even the slightest interest in what has been slopped across social media recently would've
cautioned him to not use those words.
Yet he did and said them on -allegedly, one of the world's most respected broadcasting companies.
He cannot recall meeting this woman, but he can remember taking his daughter to a food-outlet on that particular day.
Prince Andrew said it was for a party, but what kind of party? Princess Beatrice's birthday is 8th August 1988, which would
have made her 13 years-old in 2001. Ms Giuffre stated that the date of her 'experience' was 10th March, so the visit wasn't
to celebrate her birthday and that the first encounter was at a nightclub, not a place one would go during the day.
Again, what type of security would you think there'd be for the second son of the Queen of England to just 'visit' a eating
-house on the corner of Oaks Road and Goldsworth Road in a town just south of London?
Never mind a light-pulsing busy Disco where Prince Andrew could be kidnapped! These types of activities require checking,
names of employees scrutinised and security agencies involved.
Once again, important questions are not asked. Can a member of Royalty just turn up at a nightclub without the property
being first checked for undesirables and then monitored during the visit? Or was it a private function of a particular class-level,
where those attending were of suitable merit and on a special list?
If so, how did Giuffre get in...? Who gave the security agencies the nod that she was okay?!
If you wish to read the rest of the hand-washing, it's in the link below the article, but even for a 59 year-old 'normie' like me,
I can see his obvious cry for assistance. For those in the shadowy world of sexual exploitation for the elites, those words meant
'Shut It Down And Do It Now'.
Subtlety is usually a prerequisite when dealing with a taboo-activity and the news-hungry press, but if the
story you're trying to get out from under of has public passion and other information waiting to be exposed,
sometimes it's best to cry out the words that 'those-with-ears-to-listen' will rally to your side immediately.
Remember, Prince Andrew's interview was made at the BBC and broadcast on a Saturday evening at
9.00.pm. and on BBC 2, a lesser-used channel at that particular time. And of course, who funds the BBC?!
And so the man who's ex-wife took £15,000 from Epstein for debt problems, made the call and see if you
can spot the words. It's no accident that the BBC piece left what Prince Andrew said was his alibi until further
down to article. They had to because -like most news outlets, they believe readers only scan the headline
and possibly the first paragraph.
But they knew what he was saying and they knew that it was too direct.
Here we go.
Quote:Prince Andrew 'categorically' denies sex claims.
'The Duke of York has "categorically" denied having any sexual contact with an American woman, who says
she was forced to have sex with him aged 17. Answering questions about his links to convicted sex offender
Jeffrey Epstein in a BBC interview, Prince Andrew said the alleged incidents "never happened".
Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's accusers, claimed she was forced to have sex with the prince three times.
The prince said he was at home with his children on one of the occasions.
Prince Andrew, who is the Queen's third child, has been facing questions for several months over his ties to
Epstein, a 66-year-old American financier who took his own life while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges...'
Up to now, all fairly normal. We don't know who wrote this as the usual Journalist's name is missing under the title,
but you can bet it was heavily edited and checked. Of course, the interview itself was a milktoast formula and real
probing was never even contemplated.
Quote:'...Virginia Giuffre - then called Virginia Roberts - has said she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew between
2001 - when she was 17 - and 2002, in London, New York and Epstein's private island in the US Virgin Islands.
Speaking to BBC Newsnight's Emily Maitlis, the prince said: "It didn't happen. I can absolutely categorically tell you
it never happened."
"I have no recollection of ever meeting this lady, none whatsoever."
He said Ms Giuffre's account of him "profusely sweating" and "pouring with perspiration" when they danced at the club
on the night in 2001 when she says they first had sex was impossible, because he had a medical condition preventing
him from perspiring.
In an extraordinary interview, which you can watch in full on BBC iPlayer in the UK or YouTube elsewhere in the world,
the duke said:
*He had investigations carried out to establish whether a photograph of him with Ms Giuffre was faked, but they were
inconclusive
*He would testify under oath if "push came to shove" and his lawyers advised him to
*He was unaware of an arrest warrant against Epstein when he invited him to Princess Beatrice's 18th birthday party
at Windsor Castle
*He does not regret his friendship with Epstein because of "the opportunities I was given to learn" from him about trade
and business
*Speaking out about his relationship with the financier had become almost "a mental health issue" for him...'
"Unaware of an arrest warrant"..? Do you have any idea the vetting-procedures that goes on just to hold an actual
interview away from a secured area for the Windsors?! And as far as a 'mental health issue' is concerned, the same
broadcasters have had no problems with boasting the military careers of the Royals and their supposed-front-line
activity in conflicts.
But Prince Andrew is playing the victim card and BBC Newsnight host Emily Maitlis is letting him use it.
Quote:'.Addressing Ms Giuffre's claims that she had dined with the prince, danced with him at a nightclub, and went on to have
sex with him at the house of Ghislaine Maxwell, a friend of the prince, in Belgravia, central London, he said "there are a
number of things that are wrong with that story".
He said the date when Ms Giuffre says he had sex with her was 10 March 2001, when he had taken his daughter Beatrice
to Pizza Express in Woking for a party before spending the night at home.
"Going to Pizza Express in Woking is an unusual thing for me to do," he said. "I remember it weirdly distinctly."...'
There it is, there's the call. 'Woking' [pronounced woke-king] and Pizza Express. Anyone from Prince Andrew's many
advisers and those of the BBC with even the slightest interest in what has been slopped across social media recently would've
cautioned him to not use those words.
Yet he did and said them on -allegedly, one of the world's most respected broadcasting companies.
He cannot recall meeting this woman, but he can remember taking his daughter to a food-outlet on that particular day.
Prince Andrew said it was for a party, but what kind of party? Princess Beatrice's birthday is 8th August 1988, which would
have made her 13 years-old in 2001. Ms Giuffre stated that the date of her 'experience' was 10th March, so the visit wasn't
to celebrate her birthday and that the first encounter was at a nightclub, not a place one would go during the day.
Again, what type of security would you think there'd be for the second son of the Queen of England to just 'visit' a eating
-house on the corner of Oaks Road and Goldsworth Road in a town just south of London?
Never mind a light-pulsing busy Disco where Prince Andrew could be kidnapped! These types of activities require checking,
names of employees scrutinised and security agencies involved.
Quote:No memoryBBC:
Ms Giuffre described him providing her with alcohol at a nightclub, but Prince Andrew said: "I don't drink, I don't think I've ever
bought a drink in Tramps whenever I was there." On claims he was sweating, he said: "I have a peculiar medical condition which
is that I don't sweat or I didn't sweat at the time," he said, blaming it on "an overdose of adrenaline in the Falklands War".
He said he had only started to be able to sweat again "in the recent past".
Asked about a photograph of him and Ms Giuffre being taken at Ghislaine Maxwell's house, he said he had "absolutely no memory"
of it. "Investigations that we've done" have been unable to prove whether the photograph was faked, he said, "because it is a
photograph of a photograph of a photograph".
Prince Andrew said he did not recall going upstairs in that house, said he was not dressed as he usually would be if he was in London
and added "we can't be certain as to whether or not that's my hand". "I'm at a loss to explain this particular photograph," he said...'
Once again, important questions are not asked. Can a member of Royalty just turn up at a nightclub without the property
being first checked for undesirables and then monitored during the visit? Or was it a private function of a particular class-level,
where those attending were of suitable merit and on a special list?
If so, how did Giuffre get in...? Who gave the security agencies the nod that she was okay?!
If you wish to read the rest of the hand-washing, it's in the link below the article, but even for a 59 year-old 'normie' like me,
I can see his obvious cry for assistance. For those in the shadowy world of sexual exploitation for the elites, those words meant
'Shut It Down And Do It Now'.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.