25th February 2019.
Like most of the well-established media today, cherry-picking from a subject is a major tool in hopefully driving up
ratings and creating social media conversations that are easy to report on. It's a cheap trick really, it requires little
research and with the right wording, can give a 'Journalist' a few paragraphs that'll appease an Editor looking for
what they call news these days.
If we take the position that both sides of an argument can be correct and only different when judged by a viewer
given particular reactionary bullet-points, then we might begin to understand how mainstream media have been
low-balling their customers for many years.
This morning at 6.00.am, many of the major television news outlets in the UK announced that the British Government
were rolling out a new school curriculum for England that would require teachers to explain same-sex partnership,
gender-rights and facets of genitalia information.
(There are separate education curriculum for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.)
It was a major story that fought with the Oscar awards and the sparse dubious Brexit news, but with the use of preferred
optics, it was also announced that parents would not be allowed to take their children out of such classes.
I frowned at the articles as I browsed the different television channels, every major station had a seated Journalist seriously
explaining how young children will be exposed to situations involving gay and lesbian equitable needs, the choice to decide
on which sex you can be and how the 'law' demands that parents cannot opt-out of these classes.
As the morning wore on, the reports faded slightly for better material surrounding the imagined race wars that Hollywood were
dealing with and how black people are slowly being better represented in the movie world.
Being English, I ignored the gleaming tributes of the stars and looked to the same mainstream media websites for a better
handle on what the British Government were ordering their citizens to force their children to be taught.
The latest (25th Feb 2019) headlines from the standard media are:
'Female genital mutilation: Children to be taught dangers' -BBC.
'Gay and trans lessons for primary schools' -The Times.
'Sex education: Menstrual health to be taught in school by 2020' -BBC.
'Primary school children 'are to be taught about gay and transgender relationships
from the age of five under new curriculum' -The Daily Mail.
'Gay & trans sex education to be taught to FIVE-YEAR-OLDS in UK & opting out is ILLEGAL' -RT.com.
'Pupils to be taught about trolling, FGM and sleeping in curriculum shake-up' -Good Morning Britain.
'School lessons to cover sexting, FGM and mental health' -The Guardian.
'Children in secondary school to be taught about female genital mutilation' -The Telegraph.
.........................................
It looks daunting doesn't it? I mean, the above articles may not be as harsh as what the BBC Breakfast News team were
initially reporting, but it looks like a decision as been made. Female genital mutilation (FGM) and transgender relationships
for little Johnny and Jane...? It certainly effects any Christmas gifts in the future.
Maybe a glance at the UK Government's website could possibly show just how controlling -those who are supposed to serve
the public, really are. The majority of the article deals with standard education such as English, Maths and Science being needed
to function in this society, but the paper does heavily lean on the teaching of the English language.
(See link here and use Contents arrows to assist)
But it's the final page that the above headlines are aiming at and I would wager the true target isn't the Government or the majoirty
of viewers who watched the BBC Breakfast news. Notice the uses of 'may' and 'some' in the information above the subject
headings. Take a look for yourself.
.........................................
And that's it. No promoting of a particular sexual orientation, no demands that all families must relinquish their children
to learning about sexual intercourse -in the manner pushed by the media and a diverse option to understand other
religions.
And that is where the MSM are focusing their drivel, religion. From a single report in The Sunday Times, these off-shoots
are looking for their favourite prey. Outrage.
.........................................
And who are these 300 parents and children...?
Using an old article from 28th January of this year, The Daily Mail and other established medias manipulated a broad-set of
outlines for a schooling curriculum to antagonise a minority religious group that adheres to a doctrine that outlaws certain parts
of that schedule.
It's propaganda alright, but it's also page-fillers for a dying profession that should know better.
Like most of the well-established media today, cherry-picking from a subject is a major tool in hopefully driving up
ratings and creating social media conversations that are easy to report on. It's a cheap trick really, it requires little
research and with the right wording, can give a 'Journalist' a few paragraphs that'll appease an Editor looking for
what they call news these days.
If we take the position that both sides of an argument can be correct and only different when judged by a viewer
given particular reactionary bullet-points, then we might begin to understand how mainstream media have been
low-balling their customers for many years.
This morning at 6.00.am, many of the major television news outlets in the UK announced that the British Government
were rolling out a new school curriculum for England that would require teachers to explain same-sex partnership,
gender-rights and facets of genitalia information.
(There are separate education curriculum for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.)
It was a major story that fought with the Oscar awards and the sparse dubious Brexit news, but with the use of preferred
optics, it was also announced that parents would not be allowed to take their children out of such classes.
I frowned at the articles as I browsed the different television channels, every major station had a seated Journalist seriously
explaining how young children will be exposed to situations involving gay and lesbian equitable needs, the choice to decide
on which sex you can be and how the 'law' demands that parents cannot opt-out of these classes.
As the morning wore on, the reports faded slightly for better material surrounding the imagined race wars that Hollywood were
dealing with and how black people are slowly being better represented in the movie world.
Being English, I ignored the gleaming tributes of the stars and looked to the same mainstream media websites for a better
handle on what the British Government were ordering their citizens to force their children to be taught.
The latest (25th Feb 2019) headlines from the standard media are:
'Female genital mutilation: Children to be taught dangers' -BBC.
'Gay and trans lessons for primary schools' -The Times.
'Sex education: Menstrual health to be taught in school by 2020' -BBC.
'Primary school children 'are to be taught about gay and transgender relationships
from the age of five under new curriculum' -The Daily Mail.
'Gay & trans sex education to be taught to FIVE-YEAR-OLDS in UK & opting out is ILLEGAL' -RT.com.
'Pupils to be taught about trolling, FGM and sleeping in curriculum shake-up' -Good Morning Britain.
'School lessons to cover sexting, FGM and mental health' -The Guardian.
'Children in secondary school to be taught about female genital mutilation' -The Telegraph.
.........................................
It looks daunting doesn't it? I mean, the above articles may not be as harsh as what the BBC Breakfast News team were
initially reporting, but it looks like a decision as been made. Female genital mutilation (FGM) and transgender relationships
for little Johnny and Jane...? It certainly effects any Christmas gifts in the future.
Maybe a glance at the UK Government's website could possibly show just how controlling -those who are supposed to serve
the public, really are. The majority of the article deals with standard education such as English, Maths and Science being needed
to function in this society, but the paper does heavily lean on the teaching of the English language.
(See link here and use Contents arrows to assist)
But it's the final page that the above headlines are aiming at and I would wager the true target isn't the Government or the majoirty
of viewers who watched the BBC Breakfast news. Notice the uses of 'may' and 'some' in the information above the subject
headings. Take a look for yourself.
Quote:The national curriculum.
*sex and relationships education (year 7 onwards)
*religious education (RE)
They may not have to take exams in these subjects.
*Sex and relationship education
*Sex and relationship education (SRE) is compulsory from age 11 onwards.
*It involves teaching children about reproduction, sexuality and sexual health.
*It does not promote early sexual activity or any particular sexual orientation.
Some parts of sex and relationship education are compulsory -these are part of the national curriculum for science.
Parents can withdraw their children from all other parts of sex and relationship education if they want.
All schools must have a written policy on sex education, which they must make available to parents for free.
Religious education
Schools have to teach RE but parents can withdraw their children for all or part of the lessons.
Pupils can choose to withdraw themselves once they’re 18.
Local councils are responsible for deciding the RE syllabus, but faith schools and academies can set their own.
.........................................
And that's it. No promoting of a particular sexual orientation, no demands that all families must relinquish their children
to learning about sexual intercourse -in the manner pushed by the media and a diverse option to understand other
religions.
And that is where the MSM are focusing their drivel, religion. From a single report in The Sunday Times, these off-shoots
are looking for their favourite prey. Outrage.
.........................................
Quote:'...As part of the changes, secondary school children will receive at least one compulsory term of sex ed lessons by age 16,
including lessons on the damage caused by female genital mutilation .
Sexting, online grooming, domestic violence and forced marriage will also be put under the spotlight.
The announcement comes after more than 300 parents and children gathered outside of a primary school yesterday to protest
against lessons on homosexuality and gender...'
And who are these 300 parents and children...?
Quote:SOURCE:
'...Muslim demonstrators said they would rather leave the UK than allow their children to continue attending Parkfield Community
School in Birmingham, West Midlands. Parents' anger is aimed at the school's assistant head Andrew Moffat, who is behind the
'No Outsiders' lessons.
He created the scheme to teach children about the Equality Act and British values.
Pupils at the school have five of these lessons a year, covering areas outlined in the Act: age, disability, gender reassignment,
marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy or maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation.
However, the school is expected to be backed by Ofsted this week when the school is again handed its highest rating.
Tomorrow a petition signed by more than 100,000 people objecting to the sex and relationships curriculum will be debated in
parliament.
Parents' anger is aimed at the school's assistant head Andrew Moffat, who is behind the 'No Outsiders' lessons.
He created the scheme to teach children about the Equality Act and British values.
Pupils at the school –rated outstanding by Ofsted –have five of these lessons a year, covering areas outlined in the Act:
age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy or maternity, race, religion or belief, sex
and sexual orientation...'
Using an old article from 28th January of this year, The Daily Mail and other established medias manipulated a broad-set of
outlines for a schooling curriculum to antagonise a minority religious group that adheres to a doctrine that outlaws certain parts
of that schedule.
It's propaganda alright, but it's also page-fillers for a dying profession that should know better.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.