12-25-2017, 08:28 PM
@'Ninurta'
Here is the problem with trying to tie those Russian ads to Trumps win. The highest monetary figures I've been able to find on Russian spending on Twitter and Facebook advertising in connection to the 2016 election is 100,000 on Facebook and 247,000 on Twitter. (Those are the highest figures, others claim lower monetary amounts )
With Trump and Clinton spending 81 million in Facebook advertising and God only knows how much more on Twitter - how can they say 100,000 worth of Facebook advertising truly caused the democratic party to lose the election. ..
It's so bogus it's unreal... and then when they cry about a 'foreign country' meddling in any capacity with our elections being wrong when speaking of Russia, but are eerily silent on the donations to dems by China and other countries - it screams hypocrisy. ..
Here is the problem with trying to tie those Russian ads to Trumps win. The highest monetary figures I've been able to find on Russian spending on Twitter and Facebook advertising in connection to the 2016 election is 100,000 on Facebook and 247,000 on Twitter. (Those are the highest figures, others claim lower monetary amounts )
With Trump and Clinton spending 81 million in Facebook advertising and God only knows how much more on Twitter - how can they say 100,000 worth of Facebook advertising truly caused the democratic party to lose the election. ..
It's so bogus it's unreal... and then when they cry about a 'foreign country' meddling in any capacity with our elections being wrong when speaking of Russia, but are eerily silent on the donations to dems by China and other countries - it screams hypocrisy. ..