Coronavirus - Take two - Action!

[727Sky]

https://www.hartgroup.org/an-epidemic-of...c-arrests/

An epidemic of Cardiac Arrests
February 25, 2022

[i]Over 20,000 excess arrest calls in 2021[/i]
The official line is that the weekly reports of people collapsing in the audience of football matches are no different to normal, only in the past the matches would not have been stopped. There may be an element of truth in that, but the rise in ambulance calls for cardiac and respiratory arrests suggests that people are right in their suspicions and that there are good reasons for genuine concern about the health of the nation’s hearts.

The UK reports detailed and timely public health data, something for which we should be very proud. A weekly report from the 10 English ambulance trusts shows numbers of calls for cardiac or respiratory arrests. The two are grouped together as it is not always clear whether a cardiac arrest was precipitated by a respiratory arrest. The data shows two anomalies:

1. a significant rise in arrest calls since spring 2021 and
   
2. a significant rise in the number of expected arrest calls in the baseline figure.
   

The latter is important as deciding whether there is a problem is critically dependent on knowing what “normal” levels should be. There is no text in the reports detailing why the baseline has shifted so dramatically. The expected number of daily arrest calls rose suddenly in March by about 50 per day –  around 30% higher than before. 
Other publications have shown such shifts when additional trusts are added to the dataset but all the ambulance trusts have been reporting data throughout this period. What is more, the baseline for other conditions, e.g. overdoses and falls or injuries, have remained constant between 2019 and 2021. The only other baseline that has shifted significantly is that for chest pain which has risen from a steady 1,600 per day to 2,000. The number of calls for chest pain remains around the previous baseline of 1,600.
Another explanation could be that the shift in baseline is caused by a change in the years included in the calculation. The baseline is usually made up of the previous 5 years so in 2019 it would have included 2014-2018 and in 2021 it included 2016-2020. If 2015 had a particularly low level of arrest calls then removing it from the baseline would cause a rise. However, this would be expected to occur from 1st January not March.
The reason for the rise in baseline therefore remains unexplained.
The original data reports the daily numbers as well as a 7 day rolling average. Prior to 2021 the peak daily calls were around 400 arrest calls in a day. However, this winter the peak surged beyond an unprecedented 500 in a single day. 
It is notable that the 2019 and 2020 expectations for the number of arrest calls are almost identical – only a 0.2% difference. However, the 2021 baseline was inflated by 14%. Using the 2019/2020 baseline the number of arrest calls has been 30% above expected levels with 27,800 extra arrest calls. That amounts to over 500 extra arrest calls every day (although they were not evenly distributed through the year). Between 90 and 97% of these people will have died as a result. 
Given the uncertainty about the reason for the rise in baseline, there must also be some uncertainty around the 27,800 figure. However, it is fair to say there were 20,000 more arrest calls in 2021 than in 2019, a 20% increase. This compares to an increase of 6,000 in 2020 compared to 2019, a 6% increase. Whereas the increase in 2020 was clearly associated with the covid waves, the increase from May 2021 has been high regardless of covid prevalence.
When a football match is suspended, the reality of a sudden illness in a sick parent or grandparent hits home. When a number is presented on a graph, a distance is created from the hurt that is caused by that event. Those football matches are just a sample of the population, and for every father taken away by ambulance while his daughter goes home with a friend there were around 70 others not in a football stadium who were similarly affected that day. Taken together with the rise in excess deaths in the young and the rise in deaths at home, there is a hidden non-covid public health crisis here that is causing far more harm than this year’s dominant respiratory virus.

[727Sky]

[BIAD]

The Henry VIII of viruses -Omicron, as rid the UK of the Church of SAGE (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies)
 

[727Sky]

Great video with dry humor https://www.bitchute.com/video/SvbBNutA2MH1/

[BIAD]

Great video with dry humor https://www.bitchute.com/video/SvbBNutA2MH1/

On the back of Sky's video link:

Children's Health Defense (CHD) Says Pfizer and FDA Dropped Data Bombshell on COVID Vaccine Consumers

Clinical trial data contradicts ‘safe and effective’ government/industry mantra

'Washington, DC, March 03, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- In a 55,000-page set of documents released on Tuesday,
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) is for the
first time allowing the public to access data Pfizer submitted to FDA from its clinical trials in support of a COVID-19
vaccine license.

This follows U.S. District Judge Mark T. Pittman’s decision on January 6 to deny the request from the FDA to suppress
the data for the next 75 years which the agency claimed was necessary, in part, because of its “limited resources.”

A 38-page report included in the documents features an Appendix, “LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST,
 that lists 1,291 different adverse events following vaccination.

The list includes acute kidney injury, acute flaccid myelitis, anti-sperm antibody positive, brain stem embolism,
brain stem thrombosis, cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, cardiac ventricular thrombosis, cardiogenic shock, central
nervous system vasculitis, death neonatal, deep vein thrombosis, encephalitis brain stem, encephalitis hemorrhagic,
frontal lobe epilepsy, foaming at mouth, epileptic psychosis.


Facial paralysis, fetal distress syndrome, gastrointestinal amyloidosis, generalized tonic-clonic seizure, Hashimoto'
encephalopathy, hepatic vascular thrombosis, herpes zoster reactivation, immune-mediated hepatitis, interstitial
lung disease, jugular vein embolism, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, liver injury, low birth weight.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, myocarditis, neonatal seizure, pancreatitis, pneumonia, stillbirth,
tachycardia, temporal lobe epilepsy, testicular autoimmunity, thrombotic cerebral infarction, Type 1 diabetes mellitus,
venous thrombosis neonatal, and vertebral artery thrombosis among 1,246 other medical conditions following vaccination.

“This is a bombshell,” said Children’s Health Defense (CHD) president and general counsel Mary Holland. “At least now
we know why the FDA and Pfizer wanted to keep this data under wraps for 75 years. These findings should put an
immediate end to the Pfizer COVID vaccines. The potential for serious harm is very clear, and those injured by the
vaccines are prohibited from suing Pfizer for damages.”

The U.S. government has already purchased 50 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine intended for children under five years
of age to be delivered by April 30, 2022 although the FDA has yet to grant an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for this
age group.

The risk of serious injury or death from COVID to healthy children is practically nil and so far, the vaccine is not effective
when used in young children.

According to The Guardian, “Pfizer made nearly $37bn (£27bn) in sales from its Covid-19 vaccine last year – making it
one of the most lucrative products in history – and has forecast another bumper year in 2022, with a big boost coming
from its Covid-19 pill Paxlovid.”

President Biden advertised Paxlovid in his State of the Union address on Tuesday, the same day the Pfizer data was
released to the public. “We’re launching the ‘Test to Treat’ initiative so people can get tested at a pharmacy, and if they’re
positive, receive antiviral pills on the spot at no cost,” Biden said during his speech.

From mid-December, 2020 through February 18, 2022, the U.S. government’s database, the Vaccine Adverse Events
Reporting System (VAERS), has received 1,134,984 reports of adverse events, including 24,402 deaths, following
COVID vaccination. Additionally, there have been 4,021 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in the U.S. with 2,475
cases associated with Pfizer, 1,364 cases with Moderna and 171 cases with J&J’s COVID vaccine.

These include 643 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis in children aged 12 to 17.

“It would be criminal to expose infants and young children to this extremely risky product,” said Holland. “VAERS data
show the catastrophic health impacts the vaccine is having on millions of people, yet Pfizer and other vaccine makers
are raking in billions of dollars with no fear of being held accountable for injuries and deaths from their vaccines.”

The FDA’s attempt to suppress these data in support of the pharmaceutical industry’s bottom line isn’t a new phenomenon
in this country’s public health system. For more information on pharmaceutical corruption and the tight relationship the
industry has with government regulatory agencies, read The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the Global
War on Democracy and Public Health by CHD Chair and lead counsel Robert F. Kennedy, Jr...'

Archived Yahoo Article:

[BIAD]

The inevitable part of the end-game.




Link to the documents discussed.    Link:

[727Sky]

[727Sky]

https://conservativechoicecampaign.com/t...to-censor/

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database was updated this past Friday, March 11, 2022, and it is now reporting that there have been 1,168,894 cases of injuries and deaths following COVID-19 vaccines since December of 2020, when the FDA issued emergency use authorizations for the COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)
By way of contrast, there were 926,031 cases of injuries and deaths following all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30+ years, from 1990 through November of 2020. (Source.)
So there have been more injuries and deaths recorded in VAERS during the past 15 months following COVID-19 vaccines, than there were for the previous 30+ years combined following all vaccines recorded in VAERS.
Fetal Deaths Increase by 3,525% Following COVID-19 Vaccines

This most recent update of VAERS shows that there have now been 3,852 fetal deaths following COVID-19 vaccines. (=Aborted+pregnancy+%2810000209%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+%2810000210%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+complete+%2810061614%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+complicated+%2810061615%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+early+%2810052846%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+incomplete+%2810000217%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+induced+%2810000220%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+induced+complete+%2810060928%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+induced+incomplete+%2810053984%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+late+%2810052847%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+missed+%2810000230%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+of+ectopic+pregnancy+%2810066266%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+spontaneous+%2810000234%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+spontaneous+complete+%2810061616%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+spontaneous+complicated+%2810000238%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+spontaneous+incomplete+%2810061617%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Ectopic+pregnancy+%2810014166%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Ectopic+pregnancy+termination+%2810014168%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Ectopic+pregnancy+with+contraceptive+device+%2810074497%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Foetal+cardiac+arrest+%2810084280%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Foetal+death+%2810055690%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Premature+baby+death+%2810076700%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Premature+delivery+%2810036595%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Ruptured+ectopic+pregnancy+%2810048407%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Stillbirth+%2810042062%29&VAX=COVID19]Source.)
To arrive at the number of fetal deaths recorded in VAERS I tested several different searches on listed “symptoms” and then checked to see if the search results documented fetal deaths, since there is no demographic for “fetal deaths.”
The following is the current list of “symptoms” in VAERS that reveals fetal deaths:

• Aborted pregnancy
  
• Abortion
  
• Abortion complete
  
• Abortion complicated
  
• Abortion early
  
• Abortion incomplete
  
• Abortion induced
  
• Abortion induced incomplete
  
• Abortion late
  
• Abortion missed
  
• Abortion of ectopic pregnancy
  
• Abortion spontaneous
  
• Abortion spontaneous complete
  
• Abortion spontaneous incomplete
  
• Ectopic pregnancy
  
• Ectopic pregnancy termination
  
• Ectopic pregnancy with contraceptive device
  
• Foetal cardiac arrest
  
• Foetal death
  
• Premature baby death
  
• Premature delivery
  
• Ruptured ectopic pregnancy
  
• Stillbirth
  

This list may not be exhaustive. But if we use the exact same search using these symptoms, we can compare “apples to apples” in examining fetal deaths following COVID-19 vaccines as compared to fetal deaths following all non-COVID vaccines.
Using this search for all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30+ years before the COVID-19 vaccines were given emergency use authorization in December of 2020, we find 2,550 fetal deaths, the vast majority of which followed vaccines produced by Merck, which would include the Gardasil vaccines. (=Aborted+pregnancy+%2810000209%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+%2810000210%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+complete+%2810061614%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+complicated+%2810061615%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+early+%2810052846%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+incomplete+%2810000217%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+induced+%2810000220%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+induced+complete+%2810060928%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+induced+incomplete+%2810053984%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+late+%2810052847%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+missed+%2810000230%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+of+ectopic+pregnancy+%2810066266%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+spontaneous+%2810000234%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+spontaneous+complete+%2810061616%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+spontaneous+complicated+%2810000238%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Abortion+spontaneous+incomplete+%2810061617%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Ectopic+pregnancy+%2810014166%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Ectopic+pregnancy+termination+%2810014168%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Ectopic+pregnancy+with+contraceptive+device+%2810074497%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Foetal+cardiac+arrest+%2810084280%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Foetal+death+%2810055690%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Premature+baby+death+%2810076700%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Premature+delivery+%2810036595%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Ruptured+ectopic+pregnancy+%2810048407%29&SYMPTOMS[]=Stillbirth+%2810042062%29&VAX_YEAR_HIGH=2020&VAX_MONTH_HIGH=11]Source.)
Here are the yearly averages then according to VAERS:

• 85 fetal deaths per year following non-COVID vaccines
  
• 3082 fetal deaths per year following COVID-19 vaccines
  

That’s a 3,525% increase in fetal deaths following COVID-19 vaccines, compared to reported fetal deaths following all FDA approved vaccines combined for the previous 30 years.
And still, I have not seen one single source in the Alternative Media report on these statistics (although a few of them have picked up our articles on the topic.)
Why is that?
Is it because they are afraid to cite us as a source for coming up with these search parameters, due to the fact that we also report the truth on pro-vaccine Donald Trump, and the pro-vaccine superstar doctors, which would upset their reader base and supporters?
Is that why these statistics are censored in the Alternative Media? If so, then you all have blood on your hands, because you are withholding what could be life-saving information to help a pregnant woman or child-bearing age woman make an informed decision about whether or not to receive one of these shots.
I don’t need any credit or links back for this information to be published! Do your own searches and report the same thing if you don’t want to be associated with us. There’s no ego here, and I do not earn any money from publishing these statistics.
This is about informed consent, and giving the public the statistics from the U.S. Government’s own database to have the data one needs to make an informed decision about these COVID-19 vaccines.
Facebook Fact Checkers Try to Discredit These Reports but End Up Verifying Them Instead!

Source.
Since we appear to be the only one publishing these statistics on fetal deaths, they have been shared widely on Facebook, as one would expect, forcing Facebook to call out their “Fact Checkers” to kill the traffic to our websites where we publish this data.
If you look at the image above from one of their “Fact Checking” sites, Politifact, one is led to believe that they have actually fact checked our data and found it be false.
But if you read the actual article they wrote, if you understand English and have at least a 3rd grade reading level, you will quickly see that they do not deny the facts we are reporting at all, but instead are attacking us based on the search tool we used to extract this data from VAERS, which is Medalerts.org.
But even then, they are not disputing the fact that the data extracted from VAERS through Medalerts.org is inaccurate or different from the CDC’s own front-end search tool for VAERS, because it is not, it is because they do not like the organization who developed this search tool, the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), who they refer to as “an anti-vaccine organization.”
If you have ever studied logic, you will know that this is a logical fallacy called an “ad hominem” attack, which means an attack against the reputation of the person making a claim, but not the actual facts of what they are claiming.
The opposite of an “ad hominem” fallacy is the “appeal to authority” fallacy, which says that something is true based on the person’s reputation independent of whatever “facts” they are claiming to be reporting.
And that’s all Facebook is doing here. They are saying that the results from Medalerts.org are not trustworthy because the NVIC is “an anti-vaccine organization,” and they are disagreeing that the facts from VAERS proves that the COVID-19 vaccines are dangerous for pregnant women, because the CDC, The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and The American Academy of Pediatrics all agree that the vaccines are safe for pregnant women, regardless of what is published in VAERS.
Notice that they never once say that the actual data from VAERS is inaccurate, because it is not. The data extracted from VAERS via Medalerts.org is exactly the same data you will extract from VAERS on the CDC website, but the search tool on the CDC website is very difficult to use (intentionally??), which is why most people will choose to use Medalerts.org instead.

If you search for all cases filed in VAERS following a COVID-19 vaccine from Medalerts.org today, you will get a result of 1,168,894 cases. (Source.)
One of the nice features of the Medalerts.org search tool is that they provide a URL at the bottom of every search conducted to display the results of that search, so you can go back to it and share the link with others.
The CDC VAERS search tool does not supply that. But if you do a search on their site for all cases in VAERS following a COVID-19 vaccine, you get the exact same number: 1,168,894.

In another, more recent, Facebook “Fact Check” article that did not slander Health Impact News, but Steve Kirsch, where they also tried to discredit Medalerts.org, they actually admit that the Medalerts.org search tool is the original one, and that the CDC Wonder tool came years later.
Again, if you simply just look at their headline: “How an alternative gateway to VAERS data helps fuel vaccine misinformation“, and don’t actually read the article, you would be led to believe that they totally discredited Medalerts.org as reporting false data.
But this is what they actually wrote about Medalerts.org, after you get past all the ad hominem attacks against Kirsch:

Understanding MedAlerts
MedAlerts is an online search tool that allows users to sort through records from VAERS, the federal repository of reports about things that happen to people after they are vaccinated. Created in 2003, a few years before the Centers for Disease Control developed its own Wonder search tool, MedAlerts was a pioneering step in making VAERS reports more accessible and visible to the general public.
The MedAlerts site says that it has “a better user interface, more powerful search capabilities, and more extensive reporting,” than CDC Wonder, “making it the best VAERS search facility.” (Source.)

They even give credit to the NVIC for being the ones who originally made this data in VAERS accessible to the public!

NVIC says it played a role in developing the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which Congress passed in 1986. The law created a compensation program for families who claimed injury from vaccines, while limiting the legal exposure for drug makers.
“NVIC has monitored and reported on the implementation of the safety provisions in the (National Childhood Vaccine Injury) Act since it was enacted in November 1986,” Barbara Loe Fisher, NVIC’s president and co-founder, told PolitiFact.
The law also led to the creation in 1990 of VAERS, the reporting system that the government would use to track suspected vaccine side effects, Seth Mnookin wrote in “The Panic Virus: A True Story of Medicine, Science, and Fear,” a history of the anti-vaccine movement.
For years, VAERS reports were mostly invisible to the public. Until 2001, the public could access the reports only through a Freedom of Information Act request. In the early Internet era, the reports were digitized and made available for download from the VAERS website. Only in 2006 did the government develop CDC Wonder, a search tool for all of the agency’s data.
MedAlerts came before that. It was initially created by computer scientist Steven Rubin in 2003, before becoming subsumed by NVIC in 2005. The purpose of MedAlerts is to provide the public with a “user-friendly way to search the VAERS database,” Fisher said.
MedAlerts presents users with a simpler interface for queries and search results displayed in neatly formatted, easy-to-read tables. Whether they’re accessed through MedAlerts or CDC Wonder, though, the underlying data are the same VAERS reports. (Source.)

Never once do they state that the data pulled from VAERS via the Medalerts.org search tool is inaccurate.
Again, they attack NVIC instead, which is a non-profit, and their biggest donor, Dr. Joseph Mercola, but not the accuracy of the data they extract from VAERS.
And what is NVIC’s biggest sin in allowing people to use this free tool to easily retrieve data from VAERS according to this “Facebook Fact Checker” article?

One key difference between the two search tools is how forthcoming they are about those limitations and flaws. CDC Wonder requires users to acknowledge a lengthy disclaimer before initiating a search, and repeats the full text of the disclaimer with the search results.
On the NVIC’s MedAlerts, by contrast, you can search freely without ever seeing the disclaimer. There’s an inconspicuous link to the government disclaimer on the home page, and another link shown with the search results.
But people who don’t notice or click on the link won’t see the warnings. This leaves little standing in the way between the public and raw, unverified data. (Source. Emphasis mine.)

Oh no!!! We can’t let the public have access to the raw data without the Government explaining it and making them sign a disclaimer agreeing with the government before letting them search! Oh no, that should not happen because the public is too stupid to read raw data! They might actually believe that there are safety problems with the vaccines, and that would hurt sales!
If you read the Government disclaimer, which they even admit is provided on Medalerts.org, just not required to agree to prior to searching, it basically says that the information in VAERS is not reliable and that only the U.S. Government can interpret it.
I am sure they would love to get rid of VAERS completely, but they are required by law to maintain this database. It was one of the requirements in the 1986 Act that now prevents people from suing vaccine manufacturers over injuries and deaths due to vaccines.
The pharmaceutical companies have legal immunity from these lawsuits, and one has to sue the Federal Government in their own Vaccine Court instead, and even then you cannot sue for any damages from a COVID-19 vaccine, because they are part of the PREP Act.
So if the U.S. Government wants us to believe that VAERS is not reliable and should not be used to determine if a vaccine is safe or not, then the 1986 National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program should be abolished, and people should be able to start suing the pharmaceutical companies again if they put bad vaccines into the market that kill and maim people (which is pretty much all of them).
In the meantime, Facebook’s “Fact Checkers” are anything but sources of checking “facts.” They are constantly being sued, and in a lawsuit filed last year, they were forced to take the position that their “fact checking” articles were actually “protected opinions” so that they could at least have the illusion of being protected by the First Amendment right to “Free Speech.”

The labels themselves are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion. (Source.)

As for the fetal deaths that are following the COVID-19 vaccines in record numbers, here are two recent stories from young mothers who lost their unborn babies just after receiving a second COVID-19 vaccine.
Perhaps their words and their experiences, which obviously represent, at least, many thousands of others, can better communicate just how truly horrible this is.

[BIAD]

After playing the game across the globe, is Chyna now taking their ball home...?

China: Businesses shut as officials widen Covid lockdowns

'Multinational companies have halted some operations as China widens its Covid lockdowns - among its biggest
since the start of the pandemic. Tens of millions of people across the country face restrictions, including the entire
Jilin province and technology hub Shenzhen, as authorities report record numbers of cases.

Toyota, Volkswagen and Apple supplier Foxconn are among the firms affected.
The lockdowns have raised concerns that crucial supply chains may be disrupted.
China on Tuesday reported a record high of more than 5,000 cases, most of it in Jilin.

All 24 million residents of the north-eastern province were placed under quarantine orders on Monday. It is the first time
China has restricted an entire province since the Wuhan and Hebei lockdown at the beginning of the pandemic.
Jilin residents have been banned from moving around, and anyone wanting to leave the province must apply for police
permission.

It came a day after a five-day lockdown was placed on the 12.5 million residents of the southern city of Shenzhen, with
all buses and subway services suspended. On Tuesday authorities in Langfang city which borders the capital Beijing,
as well as Dongguan in the southern province of Guangdong, also imposed immediate lockdowns.

Businesses in many of the affected regions have been told to close or have their employees work from home, unless
they supplied essential services like food, utilities or other necessities. Foxconn, which manufactures iPhones for Apple,
stopped its operations in Shenzhen on Monday, saying the date of resumption would "be advised by the local government".

But it has several production sites in China and told the BBC it had "adjusted the production line to minimise the potential
impact". Its plant in Zhengzhou - the world's largest iPhone factory - remains open, as the city was not hit by the restrictions.
Toyota, which shut its factory in Changchun city in Jilin province, did not give a timeline for when business would resume.
The Japanese carmaker told the BBC that the move was made to consider the "impact of supplier operation", and the
"safety and security of employees and related parties".

German carmaker Volkswagen also shuttered operations in Changchun, saying production of Volkswagen and Audi cars
and their components was "affected", but that it hoped to reopen its factory on Thursday.

On Tuesday the Shanghai Composite lost 5% and the Hang Seng index, where several Chinese technology giants are listed,
fell more than 6%. Analysts believe that firms would be able to manage the disruptions. "Such lockdowns have happened before,
and [cities] have re-opened within a short period of time once the number of Covid cases were within control," Yeang Cheng Ling,
senior investment strategist at Singapore's DBS Bank, told the BBC.

UBS analyst Grace Chen said Shenzhen was not a "major" production site for suppliers, but it would be worrying if the lockdowns
extended to Shanghai and surrounding areas as the region is a key manufacturing hub for notebooks, servers and smart devices...'

BBC:

[727Sky]

https://rumble.com/vy3dea-dr.-vladimir-z...-more.html  A serious discussion about the why and the side effects of the vaccines

[727Sky]

https://generaldispatch.whatfinger.com/1...-holy-sht/

13% of women worldwide have miscarriages. Vaccinated women in 1st trimester: 75% miscarriages – Holy Sh*t…

If interested see video at link

[guohua]

Was this been a before the Mandatory Vaxx for Athletes? If this a coincidence?

769 young healthy athletes have collapsed while competing in the past year due to suffering from sudden and unexpected illnesses.

Maybe Heart Problems are one of the reasons Pfizer and other vaccine companies wanted a Federal judge to lock away their finding about the drugs for 75 years.
 

Huge spikes in the number of athletes collapsing during games have been seen in sports around the world.

An unusually high number of games have been halted due to players suddenly passing out, with many often seen gripping their chests in agony, unable to breathe due to sudden cardiac events.
This staggering wave of heart issues is unprecedented among such healthy groups of people.

“These are just two o more than 769 athletes who have collapsed during a game on the field over the last year.
“From March of 2021 to March of this year.
“The average age of the players suffering cardiac arrest is just 23-years-old.
How many 23-year-old athletes were collapsing and suffering heart attacks before this year?
“Do you know any 23-year-old people who had heart attacks before now? 
And these are just the ones we know about.
“How many have gone unreported?
“Nearly 800 athletes – young, fit people in the prime of life falling down on the field.
“In fact, 500% more soccer players in the EU are dropping dead from heart attacks than just one year ago.”

Sharp asserts that the evidence suggests the cases are not a coincidence:

“Coincidence?
“When the Pfizer vaccine is known to cause heart inflamation? No.
“In fact, many doctors treating these players list their injuries and deaths as being directly caused by the vaccine…
“This is not a coincidence – healthy teenagers dying after getting the Pfizer injection.
“Doctors warned the FDA before they released the experimental vaccine that it would ‘almost certainly cause terrible organ damage.’”

Source

So, I ask you, have you heard of this fromm the MSM, the Worshippers of the Church of Fucci.

[727Sky]

https://rumble.com/v10md2r-world-premier...water.html

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/04/wo...the-water/  either video if one does not load. They are now shifted to a more effective way of killing people.. No doubt no wiggle room.

[727Sky]

https://lists.youmaker.com/links/x0aZFpU...XBddB4pdSt

By Natali_Mis/Shutterstock
Health Viewpoints
FDA and Pfizer Knew COVID Shot Caused Immunosuppression
By Joseph Mercola
April 14, 2022 Updated: April 17, 2022
biggersmaller
Print
April 1, 2022, another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents were released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Pfizer trial data reveal natural immunity was as effective as the jab, and that shot side effects were more severe in those under 55.

With another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents, released April 1, 2022, old suspicions have gained fresh support. As reported by “Rising” cohost Kim Iversen (video above), the first bombshell revelation is that natural immunity works, and Pfizer has known it all along.
The clinical trial data showed there was no difference in outcomes between those with previous COVID infection and those who got the shot. Neither group experienced severe infection. Natural immunity was also statistically identical to the shot in terms of the risk of infection.
Younger Adults More Likely to Experience Side Effects
The second revelation is that side effects from the shots were more severe in younger people, aged 18 to 55, than those aged 55 and older. (The risk of side effects also increased with additional doses, so the risk was higher after the second dose than the first.)
As many of us have said all along, the risk of severe COVID is dramatically lower in younger people than those over 60, which makes an elevated risk of side effects unacceptable.
As noted by The Naked Emperor on Substack,[1] “with a vaccine that is producing more frequent and more severe reactions and adverse events in younger individuals, the vaccine should have been restricted to those who were actually at risk of severe COVID-19.”

Pfizer Documents Show High Rate of Myocarditis
Interestingly, Pfizer’s documentation also includes medical information that mainstream media and fact checkers have labeled as misinformation or disinformation. A pediatric consent form lists several possible side effects, including a myocarditis rate of 10 in 100,000 — far greater than the 1 in 50,000 (i.e., 2 in 100,000) rate previously reported.
We also know that myocarditis is far more frequent in young males, so for them, the risk is significantly higher than 10 in 100,000, as they make up the bulk of these injuries.
Antibody-Dependent Enhancement Has Not Been Ruled Out
Many who have warned about the possibility of mRNA shots causing antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) — a situation in which you end up being more susceptible to serious infection than you would have been otherwise — have been smeared and demonized by media and labeled as disinformation spreaders.
Yet Pfizer’s own consent form clearly states: “Although not seen to date, it cannot yet be ruled out that the studied vaccine can make a later COVID-19 illness more severe.” As noted by Iversen, if ADE truly was of no concern at all, the consent form would not include it. Yet there it is.
Vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) is also listed as an “Important Potential Risk” in Table 5 on page 11 of a document called “5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.”[2]
As of February 28, 2021, Pfizer had 138 cases of suspected VAED, 75 of which were severe, resulting in hospitalization, disability, life-threatening consequences or death; a total of 38 cases turned out to be lethal and 65 remained unresolved.[3][4]
Moreover, as noted by the Daily Expose,[5] “Phase 3 clinical trials are designed to uncover frequent or severe side effects before a vaccine is approved for use, including ADE. But herein lies the problem, [because] none of the COVID-19 vaccines have completed Phase 3 trials.”
Pfizer’s Phase 3 trial is due to be completed February 8, 2024[6]— nearly two years from now! Despite that, Pfizer concluded in its FDA submission that “None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED.”

“[H]ow on earth could they not definitively conclude that VAED was to blame when 75% of the confirmed ‘break-through’ cases reported to them were severe disease resulting in hospitalization, disability, life-threatening consequences of death?” The Daily Expose asks.[7]

Pfizer Knew About Immunosuppression
Another revealing statement found in the documents is this:

“Clinical laboratory evaluation showed a transient decrease in lymphocytes that was observed in all age and dose groups after Dose 1, which resolved within approximately one week …”

In other words, Pfizer knew that, in the first week after the shot, people of all ages experienced transient immunosuppression, or put another way, a temporary weakening of the immune system, after the first dose.
As noted by Iversen, this may have skewed infection rates, as people were not considered partially vaccinated until 14 days after their first shot,11 and officially fully vaccinated two weeks after the second dose.
If people are susceptible to infection during that first week, yet are counted as unvaccinated during that time, this makes it appear as though the unvaccinated are more prone to infection when that’s simply not true. Pfizer’s own trial showed infection was significantly more common in the vaccine group than the placebo group — 409 versus 287 — within the first seven days of the jab.
Fully Vaxxed Are More Likely to Die From COVID
The fact that Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration were aware the shot caused immunosuppression is incriminating, now that U.K. government data show that, compared to the unvaccinated, those who have received two doses are:[8]

• Up to three times more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19
  
• Twice more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19
  
• Three times more likely to die of COVID-19
  

The Pfizer documents admit there was a temporary drop in immune function after the first dose, but the real-world data showing an increased risk of severe infection and death due to COVID among the double jabbed suggest ADE may indeed be at play later on as well.
The chart below, created by the Daily Expose,[9] using data from the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022[10] (pages 40 and 45), reveals who’s more likely to get COVID. And the infection rate for triple-vaxxed is even higher than the double vaxxed.

The next chart was created by the Daily Expose[11] using data from pages 41 and 45, comparing COVID hospitalization rates.

And, finally, there is a comparison of the death rates, based on pages 44 and 45 of the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022.[12] Anyone over the age of 40 who has been double jabbed is now more likely to die of COVID than an unvaccinated person of the same age.

Negative Vaccine Effectiveness in the Real World
The Daily Expose goes on to calculate and graph the real-world effectiveness rate of the COVID jab, and it’s dire news:[13]

“If the rates per 100,000 are higher among the vaccinated, which they are, then this means the COVID-19 injections are proving to have a negative effectiveness in the real-world. And by using Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula we can accurately decipher what the real-world effectiveness among each age group actually is.

Pfizer’s vaccine formula: Unvaccinated Rate per 100k – Vaccinated Rate per 100k / Unvaccinated Rate per 100k x 100 = Vaccine Effectiveness …

This data shows that all double vaccinated people over age 18 are between 2 and 3 times more likely to be infected, with a minus-87% vaccine effectiveness among 18 to 29 year olds, and a minus-178% vaccine effectiveness among the over 80’s.

[A]ll double vaccinated people over age 30 are between 0.2 and 2 times more likely to be hospitalized, with a minus-1% vaccine effectiveness among 30 to 39 year olds, and a minus-76% vaccine effectiveness among the over 80’s.

The following chart shows the real world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against death among the double vaccinated population in England, based on the death rates provided above …

[A]ll double vaccinated people over age 40 are between 2 and 3 times more likely to die of COVID-19, with a minus-90% vaccine effectiveness among 30 to 39 year olds, and a minus-156% vaccine effectiveness among the over 80’s.”

Pfizer Hired 600 to Process Unprecedented Report Load
For the last two years, we’ve been keeping an eye on the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), shaking our heads in disbelief as the numbers shot up by the hundreds every single week, rapidly outpacing injuries for every other vaccine combined over the past 32 years.[14]
As of March 25, 2022, there were 1,205,753 COVID jab-related reports, including 145,781 hospitalizations and 26,396 deaths.[15] There has never been a medical product in modern history that can compare. Nothing has been as injurious and lethal as these experimental injections.
Between December 2020 and the end of February 2021, Pfizer shipped out 126,212,580 doses of its mRNA jab worldwide. Divided by 158,000 side effects, we get an adverse event rate per dose of nearly 1:800.
In an earlier batch of documents, we learned Pfizer received 42,086 case reports containing a total of 158,893 events in the first three months of the rollout. In that release, the number of doses shipped was redacted, but in the April 1, 2022, release, it was left unredacted, which means we can now calculate the rate of adverse events reported to Pfizer in those first three months.
Between December 2020 and the end of February 2021, Pfizer shipped out 126,212,580 doses of its mRNA jab worldwide. Divided by 158,000 side effects, we get an adverse event rate per dose of nearly 1 in 800,[16] which is just crazy irresponsible.
We now also have documentation showing Pfizer, by the end of February 2021, had hired 600 additional full-time employees to process the unprecedented influx of adverse event reports, and they predicted that by the end of June 2021, they’d end up hiring more than 1,800.[17]
In the end, the COVID jab will go down in history as the biggest medical malfeasance ever to occur with the willing participation of both drug companies and regulatory agencies. And there’s no end in sight.
In March 2022, the FDA went ahead and authorized doses 4 and 5, based on a preprint study[18][19] that found a fourth Moderna shot was 11% effective and caused side effects in 40% of recipients, and a fourth Pfizer shot was 30% effective and caused side effects in 80% of people.
I’m not sure what it’ll take for this public health nightmare to end and for the responsible parties to be held to account for their criminal negligence, but apparently, we’ve not hit critical mass outrage yet.
Originally published April 14, 2022 on Mercola.com

[Ninurta]

https://lists.youmaker.com/links/x0aZFpU...XBddB4pdSt

By Natali_Mis/Shutterstock
Health Viewpoints
FDA and Pfizer Knew COVID Shot Caused Immunosuppression
By Joseph Mercola
April 14, 2022 Updated: April 17, 2022
biggersmaller
Print
April 1, 2022, another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents were released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Pfizer trial data reveal natural immunity was as effective as the jab, and that shot side effects were more severe in those under 55.

...

Well! That tells a "surprising" tale! It appears that, according to Pfizer's own data, folks are more likely to catch, be hospitalized from, and die from covid if they are double-vaccinated or higher, a risk which dramatically increases in older folks. Not surprising that it works like that, but surprising they would release that data into an arena where the public can get hold of it and analyze it... or were these documents part of the court-ordered release that the government tried to keep buried for 75 years?

In any event, it confirms my strange notion that injecting substances into your body that produce antibodies for any given malady is a bad idea, since whatever triggers the antibody production is also gonna make you sick, and I see mo good reason to make myself sick on purpose...

.

[NoAngels]

Double jabbed and boosted here, never had a day off work during all of covid. I had Astra vaccine and Pfizer booster

A mate working as a mechanic a couple of units away from me caught the alpha variant from his wife who is very obese and she was rough over Christmas 2020 but he fit and in his early 50’s nearly died and spent over 6 months in hospital. He only came back to work this year and gets out of breath just talking

A good friend at my work caught the Kent variant xmas 21 and lost his smell completely for a few weeks and just a few weeks ago caught omicron, seeing as we keep 2 meters away during winter months I have not to the best of my knowledge caught any variant 

Also didn’t get any reactions to any of my vaccine shots, the same as a majority of people do

[guohua]

Also didn’t get any reactions to any of my vaccine shots, the same as a majority of people do

@"NoAngels"  I hope you don't, it sounds bad.

A pathologist who heads one of America's leading labs is finding unusually long blood clots, as long as one foot, in the bodies of deceased people who received COVID-19 vaccines.

Dr. Ryan Cole of Cole Diagnostics in Boise, Idaho, said his lab is "seeing mushy organs, we're seeing incredibly inflamed organs."

"We know the spike protein causes all the ... bad outcomes that the virus did in 2020," he said in an interview with Greg Hunter for USAWatchdog reported by Just the News.

Cole said that in people with comorbidities – serious chronic diseases   – the synthetic spike protein in the mRNA vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna are "causing inflammation in the lung, the brain, the liver, the kidneys, the heart; it's causing the same damage that the virus was causing."

Cole also cited studies by South African physician Resia Pretorius finding the COVID "spike protein alone causes the proteins in our blood to clump."

"That spike protein is thrombogenic – it causes clots, and it causes a lot of clots," Cole said.
Morticians, he explained in a March interview with anti-COVID-vaccine activist Steve Kirsch, usually "put a dissolving fluid in to break up clots so they can get their embalming fluid in."
And they were getting back pressure on the system, saying, 'What in the world is going on?'"

The morticians, Cole said, ended up pulling out "six-inch clots, 12-inch clots, two to three-foot-long clots."
"Because, you know, from the hip down into the leg, you have a long vein called the saphenous vein. And so they were pulling long clots out of your longer veins. And ... they hadn't seen anything like this previously."

Source

[NightskyeB4Dawn]

Also didn’t get any reactions to any of my vaccine shots, the same as a majority of people do

@"NoAngels"  I hope you don't, it sounds bad.

A pathologist who heads one of America's leading labs is finding unusually long blood clots, as long as one foot, in the bodies of deceased people who received COVID-19 vaccines.

Dr. Ryan Cole of Cole Diagnostics in Boise, Idaho, said his lab is "seeing mushy organs, we're seeing incredibly inflamed organs."

"We know the spike protein causes all the ... bad outcomes that the virus did in 2020," he said in an interview with Greg Hunter for USAWatchdog reported by Just the News.

Cole said that in people with comorbidities – serious chronic diseases   – the synthetic spike protein in the mRNA vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna are "causing inflammation in the lung, the brain, the liver, the kidneys, the heart; it's causing the same damage that the virus was causing."

Cole also cited studies by South African physician Resia Pretorius finding the COVID "spike protein alone causes the proteins in our blood to clump."

"That spike protein is thrombogenic – it causes clots, and it causes a lot of clots," Cole said.
Morticians, he explained in a March interview with anti-COVID-vaccine activist Steve Kirsch, usually "put a dissolving fluid in to break up clots so they can get their embalming fluid in."
And they were getting back pressure on the system, saying, 'What in the world is going on?'"

The morticians, Cole said, ended up pulling out "six-inch clots, 12-inch clots, two to three-foot-long clots."
"Because, you know, from the hip down into the leg, you have a long vein called the saphenous vein. And so they were pulling long clots out of your longer veins. And ... they hadn't seen anything like this previously."

Source

This may explain the recent increase in the number of close friends and their family members that have been hospitalized with what they are calling a "mild heart attack". At this posting the number of known people affected is nine, in the last 45 days.

This does not include the number of friends that have come down with the flu/virus, and all them just happen to be fully vaccinated and boosted.

I think the biggest problem we have with the vaccines, is that they are built for, and around, a virus that they already admit, they have no idea where it came from, or what it is.

You can't promise an effective and safe vaccine for a virus that we know so little about.