Propaganda watch

[BIAD]

I'm not a fan of Bill Clinton, but he's actually doing what most men do, admiring the female form.
I vaguely know who Ariana Grande is from the UK-Manchester concert bombing and she seems to
hold a current style of attractiveness for males.

I would like to write that Clinton is probably play-acting to indicate his marvel for the alleged singer,
but he's always been one for perceiving women as mere vessels for his lust and has no regard for their
status as a human-being. 'You better get some ice on that.'
 
I know that it isn't in vogue at the moment and there's a level of decorum that we're supposed to adhere
to, but Bill Clinton in the above image is doing something that is built-in to the male-psyche, checking for
fat-distribution and being mentally-held by the age-old approach to mounting a female in a way that is
deemed normal in the natural world.

It's coarse to speak like this -I know, and it also dilutes the in-group, out-group situation on discussion sites
such as Rogue Nation, but it's real and what concerns me-personally is -not only the belligerent manner that
Bill Clinton interacts with females, but his assumption that he can do it and get away with it because he simply
believes he's better than his victims.

Maybe Amaterasu Solar was correct when he called them all psychopaths!

We need to to get out of this pretentious sphere of being outraged at the basic make-up of men and
women and get back to what a civilised society takes as 'normal'. The whole dichotomy of sexual behavior
has been compressed into pockets of innuendo and maybes, a corralled system where real sexual predators
can enjoy the foggy hunting-grounds of 'How-Dare-You'-ness where the bleating weak roam.

I agree an ex-President should hold himself to a higher standard than a leering cigar-case-wielding freak who
married something that's supposed to be a woman, the post of a leader has qualities that demands the bearer
to carry them for the rest of their lives. Clinton -both of them in fact, degraded his position just like many noted
leaders have all around the world.

Men are men and women are women. For the media, anything in between usually has some-sort of lurid sexual
connotation to it for ratings-value only. The problem with this is it promotes negative conduct and debatable
practices for the sole reason of keeping the media employed and by doing so, implies it's acceptable.

You'll notice that they never bring a guy onto the stage that's called 'Joe' and he's a mechanic who's married with a
couple of kids and hasn't done anything outrageous or holds what they consider intrigue. 

Being a standard part of a community isn't sexy... isn't 'news' anymore. Being a male in a dress visiting one of Target's
unisex toilets is. It's simply because people with a certain view on the world think everyone else around them thinks
that way. But it's never worked like that, some are good and kind, others prey on the blindness to evil actions.

People can be good and people can be bad, there's no divine system that can stop us from crossing the agreed societal
lines. All we can do is try to get along with each other in a non-destructive way.

Hence my Username, it confuses people on the internet with what reality really is! I ain't a boy and I don't wear a dress!
(But Bill is still a pervert.)

[BIAD]

....I think that the comic book industry has adapted to appeal to wider audience that includes more minority
characters in order to survive...

Right there is the true reason why the 'Comicgate' and the 'Gamergate' situations arose.
But if you tell the buyer the real reason it might effect ones livelihood and so a supposed
'higher' reason was created.

Of course there are people who can latch onto the idea that comics were catering for a certain
select group and they were catering for a select group, but it had nothing to do with gender or race,
it was to do with their market location.

Girls bought girl's magazines because the contents were for a generic girl to appreciate. The same
went for 'action' comics and boys.
A simple struggling medium used a blown-up outrage-provoking narrative which saw the opportunity
for a power-grab to salve their undeveloped emotions and the comic-industry ran with it.

The same comic-businesses believed that for a short time, it would promote their products in minority
sections, develop their characters to cater for these communities and the die-hard regular readers would
assume it's just part of a changing paradigm and continue to purchase their favourite comics.

What they didn't figure on was that for large sections of their customers, they'd see the 'take-over' and
openly rebel or just move-off to another interest. The indifferent and neutral owners of comic companies
were hoping that the change may initially take-up any shortfall and then quietly move their story-lines back
to near where they were and just encompass a larger 'diverse' readership.

What they also didn't take into consideration was the actual power-grab by certain parties that was based on
a belief and not preference.
.............................................

Peter Parker was a character, he wasn't white or black, gay or straight... he is an imaginary persona that was
used in exciting adventures that offered the grey-areas of decision-making in adulthood that lay ahead for the
young reader. That's it.

If he'd been Peter Parker, the scrounging photographer living hand-to-mouth, getting only part-time employment
from The Daily Bugle and struggling to get Mary-Jane to put-out for him, the bored customers would've moved to
something more interesting and Ditko would've dumped the character.

However, if you're a young person with emotions that don't fit into the accepted norms of Parker, The Reeds and
Bruce Wayne, then melodramatically -you're the outsider with the natural need to be part of a group.
What better way than taking a group, demanding via emotional taboo of certain prejudices and discrimination that
this group conform to your own beliefs without any resistance.
And quickly adding that to resist this change proves you adhere to accepted negative societal norms.

It enforces your own confidence that you're correct and offers a section of villains that you can fight for your 'cause'
with. It ensures that you will be a 'comrade', part of something and as the adult-world awaits, you no longer feel
alone.
Yer' know... the way young people have always felt when they're told to put their toys away and be an adult.

Bolstering ones doubts brings great benefits to a kid who sees the daunting prospect of failing in a world where
you're told you're supposed to succeed in.

Comics never dealt with real life head-on, the world on those pages spoke of heroism, bravery and gaining faith in
oneself through pious actions that helped others. It had nothing to do with immature confusion about a changing
body and adolescent concerns of how the world works.

It's just sad that make-believe has become believe.

[BIAD]

At the request of Mystic Wanderer, here's a fine example of two things... media manipulation
and the hoped-for influencing of the dumbed-down public by using a deceitful argument.

Whatever the preferred narrative is, those on platforms to deliver their one-sided opinions
believe that their viewers/readers accept will not perceive the obvious chicanery.
It's small-minded, schoolyard outrage, Jerry Springer used to do it years ago and it's called
entertainment.

The obvious narcissism of the subjects are used by CNN to maintain the divisiveness of the
masses. This network is basically the a propaganda outlet, a funded group to assist a preferred
political party and broadcast biased information.

Governments will never get it correct for everybody and with the assistance of managing
trigger-words, speaking over each other to imply intrigue and subtle camera positioning,
many of the mainstream medias won't acknowledge that their failing ratings are due to to
entering the arena of entertainment.

Advertising themselves as bastions of the truth and yet -offering false and misleading information,
they can be accused of being 'the enemy of the people'. But remember, many of the presenters
do it just to pay their bills, they don't care about what they broadcast and neither should you.

Governments come and go, but these guys will always need your eyes or be out of work.
Hence they bombard their customers with figures that the MSM believe are victims of being alive.
These known are the 'good' people.

The presumed -and constantly proclaimed villains are Nazis, the Klu-Klux Clan and any male with
white skin. A narrative that would look fine in one of Stan Lee's comics. Which again, shows you
how the media perceive their customers as children who cannot distinguish between reality and
fiction.




Youtube, Google and others are private companies, it would pay a person to realise that at
some point, these outlets will also fail due to their ever-changing terms of service.
Maybe not in China or other countries where free speech is harnessed, but things will change.

One day, Rogue Nation will called upon to help those lost in the maze of managed-confusion!!

[BIAD]

I can't decide if it's due to the trendy 'Any-Advertising-Is-Good-Advertising' or my red-pill is really kicking in,
but with the BBC trying this latest sh*t, I'm rapidly losing faith and thinking that the television is nothing more
than a dust collector.

'Newsnight' is a late-night programme on the BBC's second-channel BBC2 that was usually confined to the
more refined who enjoyed shows that portrayed upper-middle class folk going about their typical environment.
When I was young, it mainly broadcast English cricket all mid-morning and afternoon, an ideal time to watch
the sport if you worked in the Houses of Parliament!

The programme 'Newsnight' supposedly entertains its viewers with angled commentary about current political
issues and certainly leans left in its values. And maybe the key-word is 'entertain'.

Did BBC hire a 'fake vicar' to back May's Brexit deal on Newsnight?
Viewers discover guest is actress who has appeared in Star Wars and EastEnders.

*Lynn Hayter appeared on Newsnight on Monday to defend the Brexit agreement
*She appeared sporting a dog collar and fiercely debated five other panellists 
*She has worked as an extra, who performs under her middle name Marina

'The BBC has come under fire after it booked a Star Wars extra who calls herself a pastor through an
agency for a Brexit discussion. The broadcaster denied hiring a 'fake vicar' to appear on its flagship
political programme after social media users hit out at the BBC.


A female Vicar...? Really!

Lynn Hayter appeared on Newsnight on Monday to defend Prime Minister Theresa May's Brexit
withdrawal agreement on the UK leaving the European Union.
Today she angrily denied she had been paid by the BBC as she spoke to MailOnline outside her home.

She said: 'I was not paid by the BBC . They did not pay me. I was contacted by an independent organisation
and asked to appear.I have nothing more to say'

Hayter, who was dressed in a bright red tracksuit, was pulled inside her North West London home by a friend.
Neighbours said they knew Hayter was an actress but were not aware she was a pastor or wore a dog collar.
'That is news to me' said one neighbour. We all knew she was an actress. She is very friendly and has talked
about her work.' 

Miss Hayter is listed as a pastor on Facebook at a group called Seeds for Wealth Ministries, which claims
to 'help you realise, release and walk into your financial freedom in Christ'.
But she has also worked as an on-screen extra, and has a profile listing her profession as 'actor' on the social
media site.


The actress (pictured in character) has not only appeared in Star Wars but also EastEnders,
which led viewers to believe that she was a plant.

When she launched Seeds for Wealth in a YouTube video, she hinted that she has been involved in ministry before.
'I'm going back into ministry -the lord has called me back,' she said. 'God's put a message on my heart hes
equipped me and I'm going for it.'

But she does not mention if anybody has ordained her, nor does she appear to have an actual church as she
petitions viewers to invite her to talk.

'I have been called to unlock the seeds that are in each and every one of us and in doing so that will take you to
a higher level that will release you into your financial freedom,' she says. 'Your'e going to have to invite me to
your church to have me preach.' 

She claims to have been 'endorsed' by American evangelist Mike Murdock from The Wisdom Centre, calling him
her 'pastor and mentor' and tweeting a certificate he awarded her after she took part of his Jerusalem Project.
She tweeted a picture of Murdock's Mind Bible book, which he sells as part of a $99 'Ministry 6 PAK'.  

Other pictures on her Twitter profile show the pair meeting and social media shows that she has been to his
events in the US and also seen him when he has visited London. 
In the video online she invites people to send her Christian-themed items to sell on her Seeds for Wealth
store on Amazon.

Miss Hayter, who performs under her middle name Marina, recently appeared in the blockbuster film Star Wars
Episode VII: The Force Awakens. This has led to accusations that the BBC hired her specifically to appear on
the show playing the part of a vicar.

The argument was dubbed 'Vicargate', with some on social media convinced she was acting.
Labour peer Andrew Adonis waded into the furore, telling his Twitter followers he believed Miss Hayter to be a fake.

He sarcastically commented 'Lynn is a pastor' and I am the Pope', before calling her a 'fake pastor' and accusing
the BBC of 'a reign of lies'. Miss Maitlis [Show's Host] quickly reprimanded Lord Adonis, warning him 'not to become
a peddler of fake news'.

She tweeted: 'Not in this day and age. Not when we need our parliamentarians to be better and more trusted than ever.
'To have got to a place where you could choose to believe that enough to write it is deeply worrying.'

Other users were keen to chime in with the debate, with one '@BrexitBin' tweeting: 'WTF!
This lady playing 'Reverend Lynn' is actually an actress called Marina Hayter (stage name?)
who is a professional TV talk show guest. In other words, she was hired by @BBCNewsnight
to say she backed May's plan. This kind of undemocratic deception has to have consequences!'

This is while Antonia Frances said: 'Reverend Lynn' is in fact Marina Hayter. She has played numerous roles including
Peasant Woman, quizzical librarian and shocked neighbour but no vicars until her starring role as Brexit deal fan girl
on #Newsnight #BBC #BrexitAgreement.'

Others such as Beth Urmston poked fun at 'Vicargate' and said:
'Think Marina Lynn Hayter's days at the BBC are numbered. Pastor sell by date.'  

Elsewhere others said the BBC had 'struck gold' when they found Lynn, '@benjolly9' said:
'The @BBCNewsnight research team who set out to find an actor willing to play a Vicar 
o sing the praises of Theresa May must have thought they'd stuck gold when they found
@LynnHayter.'

As the speculation mounted, Newsnight itself was prompted to defend the decision to include her on the show.
Their statement read: 'Claims that Lynn appeared on Newsnight as a paid actor are false.
'Lynn is a pastor and was a genuine participant of our Brexit debate. She carries out work as an extra using her
middle name but this is not relevant to the capacity in which she appeared.'

Seeds For Wealth Ministries, which had 72 followers on Facebook as of last night, believes it can enrich
worshippers and take them to 'a higher level'. Miss Hayter told presenter Emily Maitlis she was '100per cent'
behind the deal and urged the public to 'put [their] faith in the government'.




She stridently defended the withdrawal agreement when quizzed by her fellow panellists.
Miss Hayter has also appeared in BBC shows EastEnders and Dickensian, among dozens more...'

DailyMail:


Like others in the comment section of The Daily Mail, I questioned her gender more than her fake impression
on the BBC  programme! But why would you contact an agency for access to a Vicar?

[Wallfire]

She said: 'I was not paid by the BBC . They did not pay me. I was contacted by an independent organisation

and asked to appear.I have nothing more to say'

Im not sure what this means ???
Does it mean that some one payed her to be there and give a POV, was the POV one that was paid for or her own ????
Why would she not tell who the "independent organisation" was.
It seems to me she is LGBTQA ( the A standing for A little b lost )

[Mystic Wanderer]

Interesting. So the fake news is trying to control what other countries think of President Trump too.  

Here is what one person from across the pond had to say on Twitter:

Omnicentrist ⛔️???‏ @Omnicentrist 8h8 hours ago


See what the Fake News is telling Australians. That is why 99% of People here do not understand Trump or what he is doing for the US. It is an attempt to stop our own Populist Voter uprising. They are saying Trump is accused of Guilt.

Notice this headline: Donald Trump has been tied to a federal crime by prosecutors. Can a president be indicted?

But, once you get into the article, it states, "Although Mr Trump hasn't been charged with anything, the question of whether a president even can be prosecuted while in office is a matter of legal dispute."

If you wish to read this rag, here's the link:  LINK

[BIAD]

Thanks to Mystic Wanderer for the Heads-Up on this one.

Misunderstood Person Dealing With Transgender Pathology, A Fruitcake Or Just Some More Constructed News?

'LET'S TAKE IT OUTSIDE!' Furious transgender woman threatens shop worker after he calls her ‘sir’ not ‘maam’

Trouble flared when the blonde woman demanded her 'f***ing' money back from the male worker behind the counter
of the GameStop store in Albuquerque, New Mexico.



'This is the dramatic moment a furious transgender woman threatened a shop employee after he called her "sir" instead
of "maam". Trouble flared when the blonde woman demanded her "f***ing" money back from the male worker behind the
counter of the GameStop store in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

When a fellow female customer stepped in and said: "Excuse me sir there is a young man in here you need to watch
your mouth" the transgender customer really let rip. She blasted: "Excuse me it is maam....it is maam."

The other woman then replied: "I can call the police if you would like me to... you need to settle down."
The furious shopper then hit back: "You need to settle down and mind your own business."

When the hapless shop worker tried to calm down the feuding pair he also found himself on the wrong end of an expletive
laden rant. The woman screamed: "Motherf***er....take it outside if you want to call me sir again. I will show you a f***ing sir."

The fuming shopper then turned and started striding towards the shop's exit, only stopping to kick over a pile of toys propped
against a shelf. She then turned back to the man behind the counter and shouted she was going to complain to his bosses
about the way she had been treated.

She said: "I am going to tell them how I have been misgendered several times in this store.
The woman then quickly added: "Stop calling me a man, because quite clearly I am not."

She then stormed back towards the exit vowing to tell others within the LGBT community about what had happened before
she added: "You will lose money over this."...'

The Sun:

The 'outraged' person in question isn't identified and considering Albuquerque is dealing with a blizzard right now, the same
person doesn't looked dressed for such wintery conditions. It seems convenient that somebody happened to be filming the
sudden upset, however, I've checked the standard news outlets around Albuquerque and there's no mention of the incident!

I can understand how local news -who's agendas may be different form the major mainstream medias, could look on it as not
newsworthy, but then again it's basically click-bait for a region and could bring in some custom, at least.

But the blonde-haired person... I was sure I'd seen 'it' before.

Ben Shapiro Files Police Report Against Transgender Reporter Zoey Tur.

'Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Ben Shapiro has filed a report with the Los Angeles Police Department alleging
battery against transgender Inside Edition reporter Zoey Tur, née Robert Albert Tur.



Shapiro filed the report Sunday morning, two days after a contentious exchange with Tur on the HLN program Dr. Drew.
On a panel discussion over Bruce Jenner’s receipt of ESPN’s Arthur Ashe Courage Award, Tur grabbed Shapiro’s neck
and growled, “You cut that out now, or you’ll go home in an ambulance.”

Shapiro later alleged that Tur had threatened him after the appearance, “I’ll see you in the parking lot,” and that CNN security
had escorted Shapiro to his car after ensuring Tur had left the premises. Tur also tweeted out on Friday that he would like to
“curb stomp” Shapiro.

Tur’s threats against Shapiro followed Shapiro arguing that referring to transgender people by their preferred instead of
biological sex is “mainstreaming delusion.” Of Jenner, Shapiro declared, “How he feels on the inside is irrelevant to the
question of his biological self.”

After Tur suggested that Shapiro knew nothing about genetics, the following exchange then occurred:
Shapiro asked if the discussion was supposed to be on genetics and asked, “What are your genetics, sir?”
Pinsky said to Tur, “I’d stay away from the genetics and back to the brain scans.”

Tur then said to Shapiro, “You cut that out now, or you’ll go home in an ambulance.”
Shapiro responded, “That seems mildly inappropriate for a political discussion.” Oduolowu said that, to be fair,
Shapiro was being rude, to which Shapiro answered, “I’m sorry, it’s not rude to say that someone who’s biologically
a male is a male.” Tur stated, “You just called me a ‘sir.’”

After some of the other panelists, particularly radio and “Chain Reaction” host Mike Catherwood, objected that Shapiro
knew that what he said would be “insulting” and “inflammatory.” Shapiro responded, “It’s not a matter of insulting or
inflammatory. It’s a fact. You are a male. Dr. Drew is a male.”...'

Breitbart:

This happened back in July of 2015 and I never gave it another thought until I  saw the image of the angry 'thing'
ripping into the kid at the store. The clothing colours are the same as Zoey Tur and the hairstyle is similar.



But it maybe it's just a fan of the American broadcast reporter and doesn't enjoy living in reality anymore.
I'd wager it's the annual slow-news-time during the holiday period and so, news has to be drummed-up!

What do you think?
...............................

Here's another anomaly in the news realm.

With the banal manner that news is reported, it always makes me grimace when an article arises
that misses out so much and relies on the trending impact of fear.

Three informative -yet stunted, sentences that explain the story, three... then repeated three times!

Man, 32, is arrested on suspicion of 'Syria-related' terror offences after landing at Luton Airport

*Man, 32, arrested at Luton Airport on suspicion of preparing terrorist acts 
*Police say the arrest is Syria-related and not related to any offence at the airport
*He was taken to a police station in the Bedfordshire area and remains in custody



'A 32-year-old man has been arrested at Luton Airport on suspicion of preparing terrorist acts,
Scotland Yard has said. Police say the man, who was arrested after landing on an inbound flight to
London, was taken into custody over Syria-related offences and not for any offences at the airport. 

The man has been taken to a police station in the Bedfordshire area and remains in custody.

A Met Police spokesperson said: 'At approximately 20:30hrs on Thursday, 27 December, officers
from the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command arrested a 32-year-old man after he arrived at Luton
Airport on an inbound flight. 

'He was arrested on suspicion of preparation of terrorist acts, contrary to Section 5 Terrorism Act
2006 and has been detained under PACE.
'He was taken to a police station in the Bedfordshire area where he remains in custody.

'The investigation is being conducted by detectives from the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command.
'The arrest is Syria-related and not related to any offences at the airport. Enquiries continue.'...'

Daily Mail:

An article that warrants releasing and yet, holds no information of any value.

I don't expect the suspect's name to be released due to no definite evidence proving guilt, but...
Where did he fly from...? how was the fare paid? Why didn't authorities from that country arrest him
before allowing a terrorist get on the plane?
Yer' know... questions a Journalist would ask.

This unknown person -who is suspected of preparing for terrorist acts, is allowed to fly from an
unstated country (inbound?!) and only when he's arrested, does the information find its way to a
mainstream news outlet. Where did he fly from?

Terrorism... 'the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of
political aims.' or the act of bringing fear to a party by indicating violence and loss.

Did this person fly from Syria to London? No, there are no direct flights from Syria to the UK.
He's committed no crime in the United Kingdom and is only arrested due to 'Syria-related offences' in
Syria. I can understand if he fled Syria after commiting such offences, but this unknown didn't flee to
Luton Airport... and he came from somewhere else.

'The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) advise against all travel to Syria.
British nationals in Syria should leave by any practical means.
The UK has suspended all services of the British Embassy in Damascus and all diplomatic staff have
been withdrawn from Syria. The FCO is not able to provide consular services.

The situation remains extremely volatile and dangerous. High levels of violence persist throughout Syria,
including full scale military operations involving the use of small arms, tanks, artillery and aircraft.
A number of chemical weapons attacks have taken place across Syria.
Estimates suggest that over 470,000 people have been killed in the Syria conflict, including over 55,000
children.

The Syrian regime does not exercise control of significant parts of Syria, notably in the north, south and
east of the country. A small area of eastern Syria remains under the effective control of Daesh (formerly
referred to as ISIL), which is fiercely hostile to the United Kingdom.

Fighting has at various times caused the temporary suspension of commercial flights, closed roads,
impeded access to land border crossing points and led to the closure of some border crossings.

Terrorists are very likely to try to carry out attacks in Syria. See Terrorism.
Continued attacks across Syria including in major cities, have left large numbers of people dead or injured.

There is a very high threat of kidnapping throughout Syria. There have been a number of kidnappings,
including of British nationals and other Westerners, including by Daesh (formerly referred to as ISIL).
If you choose to travel to Syria against FCO advice, you should make sure you and any dependents have
valid exit stamps on your travel documents if you need one and take out comprehensive travel and medical
insurance.

If you’re abroad and you need emergency help from the UK government, contact the nearest British embassy,
consulate or high commission which will be outside Syria....'

UK GOV:

With the lack of information within the article, is this really news or just another push of the fear narrative?

[Mystic Wanderer]

This happened back in July of 2015 and I never gave it another thought until I  saw the image of the angry 'thing'
ripping into the kid at the store. The clothing colours are the same as Zoey Tur and the hairstyle is similar.



But it maybe it's just a fan of the American broadcast reporter and doesn't enjoy living in reality anymore.
I'd wager it's the annual slow-news-time during the holiday period and so, news has to be drummed-up!

What do you think?

Thank you for bringing this to our attention @"BIAD".  
It certainly does look like the same "it", and as you stated, it was convenient that a camera was rolling inside the store too.
Possibly someone trying to stir up the transgender community, or maybe "it" was just seeking attention.

It's a crazy world out there!  

[guohua]

@"BIAD"  and @"Mystic Wanderer" 
I think "It" was seeking attention. When None Was Needed. Many just bring attention to themselves by their walk, talk and attitude! Yes, it's JMHO.

[BIAD]

I must admit, one of my failings is to peruse tabloids like The Daily Star and The Sun.

You're always guaranteed to read over-sensationalised articles that have little meaning in the broad
context of human societies, but they do imply having a simplistic barometer of 'good and evil' is a better
way to conduct one's lifestyle.

Words like 'outraged' and 'menace' -usually in capital letters, draws the reader into a world of vice,
corruption and a strange metaphysical tempo that indicates an ironic scheme that only the virtuous can
ignore -yet appreciate.

However, another theme runs alongside the gaudy stories and just by accident, I came across it many years
ago when I worked in the newspaper business. That of a pair of breasts being worth more than a murder.
.......................

Over a quarter of a century ago in a small isolated property close to where I live, a pretty forty-four year-old
married mother-of-three lady decided to grab some sun on the large grounds of her luxury home on the
outskirts of a small town.



It was a wealthy family with a husband who had children from a former marriage and ran a local haulage
business. The house stood alone between a town and a small village where her husband's company was
situated. A long driveway came from the busy road that connected the town to the village and a developing
airport.

Open fields surrounded the property and there were no neighbours, the woman must've appreciated the
privacy and in her bikini, settled down to acquire a rare tan from the summer sun.
It was the hottest day of August 1990 and sometime in the late afternoon, the woman decided she'd had
done enough sun-bathing for the day and retired to her cooler lounge, still in her bikini.

Around 6.00.pm, her husband of four years came back from his business and discovered his wife with her
throat cut and in a pool of blood. The radio was still playing, the dog asleep outside and the dead woman's
bikini-bottom had been removed.

There were no signs of a sex crime, nothing had been taken to imply a robbery and the pathologist stated
there was no indications of a struggle or being beaten. No weapon was found, which the same pathologist
believed was a Stanley-knife type or a cut-throat razor.

The murder hit the headlines and became national news. The deceased lady's husband became the suspect
in the media's eyes and even though a passing truck driver reported seeing a blue car leaving the peaceful
driveway at around the time of the killing, it was the husband who took the brunt of the accusations.

A friend of mine had been a photographer at where I was working and decided to seek his fame and fortune
in London. Pay was -and still is, higher in the capital and just like Dick Whittington, set out to improve his
future.
That aspiration led him to the doors of a well-known newspaper, The Sun.

Back then, page three of the tabloid offered its readers a topless model and it wouldn't be until 2015 that the
company agreed that having a bare-breasted female staring out at its customers above a serious article about
the struggles of the United Kingdom, was not true journalism.

But titillation doesn't go easy into the night and when a Sun Reporter was asked to visit the area of the murder
to write a story with something extra for its readers, my friend -the photographer, was also dispatched to get
some 'appropriate images' for the paper and to utilise his home-grown knowledge.

I spoke to him after he and his fellow-hearsay-monger had gathered what they'd believed was enough to get
the Reporter a column or two in The Sun and he explained how the word 'tawdry' was still alive and well in
Fleet Street.

By this time, it had been rumoured that the husband of the murdered woman had been having an affair with a
barmaid from a nearby golf-club and this morsel of gossip was enough to find the eager Sun Reporter and his
camera-carrying cohort knocking on the door of a woman twenty-three years younger than the man who was
supposed to be her lover.

The Reporter and his side-kick were invited in using the assurance that 'her side of the story' should be told to
let the readers know that in no way, was she any type of chess-piece on this particular board.

They chatted and when discussing how optics were vital to show the lover-barmaid's explanation of how the tryst
with the murdered woman's husband was ending, the Reporter suggested a photograph would go a long way to
enhance her innocent position in this incident

That's when the photo-albums came out. Pictures of the barmaid were displayed and it was only when one
particular snapshot showed the young woman at a fancy-dress party in a fetching basque-and-suspenders
outfit, did the Reporter bring up the subject of money.

One hundred pounds was the first offer for the sexy image and after consulting with his London-based Editor on
the telephone, the Reporter push to two hundred as a begrudging submission to the barmaid. What she didn't know
was that the Editor had said that no more than three hundred pounds could be used obtaining for the revealing print.

She took the two-hundred quid and I know for a fact how much the Reporter said he'd spent on the photograph and it
was exactly what the Editor had warned. The picture showed up the next day in an editorial that basically condemned
the husband and his family to a further tirade of accusations.

The company Director and the saucy thigh-showing Barmaid...  nectar for the tabloids.

And that's what I meant about 'titillation', if you look today at certain mainstream media websites, the many articles
offer female semi-nude imagery and paparazzi-style photographs of celebrities in sparse clothing.

The murdered woman's husband was charged with the crime and then due to failure of solid evidence, was dropped.
The family members were broken because of suspicion in-and-out of their circle that one of their own could be the
killer and of course, moving away from the area was a must.

As of this writing, nobody has been found for the murder.
Still, the newspaper got its photograph and that's what really important, eh?

[BIAD]

Reality calling... when will the MSM get their act together...?

[Mystic Wanderer]

Reality calling... when will the MSM get their act together...?

This should show people around the world that the same people are organizing and funding all the chaos. It's the same in America.
I'll be very happy to see the day when these evil demons are knocked off their pedestal. I hope the people never give up fighting to get their country back.

[BIAD]

Isn't it strange?

Sky News's report on the Manchester stabbing incident.
'...A 25-year-old man has been detained under the Mental Health Act and is
now in a secure medical facility...'
SOURCE:

The BBC's report on the London's West End incident.
'...A 26-year-old man is in custody at a central London police station...' and
'...A 34-year-old man initially arrested on suspicion of attempted murder has
been released on bail until mid-January, the police said...'
BBC:

Sky News's report on the Texas seven-year-od shooting incident.
'...The suspect is described as a bearded white man, possibly in his 40s...'
Sky News:

BBC's report on the Texas seven-year-od shooting incident.
'...Authorities say the unidentified gunman is a bearded white male in his 40s,
wearing a red sweatshirt...'
Beebs:

[BIAD]

The BBC have a web page that reports this below and it's connected to one of the quotes
from above. Yet, it doesn't make sense!

Abu Hamza's son facing firearms charge

'...A man held as part of the investigation into the murder of a security guard in Mayfair on New Year's Day
is the son of the banned radical cleric Abu Hamza.


Imran Mostafa Kamel.


Abu Hamza al-Masri - the infamous father of the suspect

Imran Mostafa Kamel is accused of possessing a firearm in relation to an incident at Fountain House, Park Lane,
which happened soon after the killing. Tudor Simionov, 33, was providing security for a party at a flat there.


Tudor Simionov.

Mr Kamel, 26, of The Grove, Ealing, appeared earlier at Westminster Magistrates' Court.
He has been charged with possession of a firearm with intent to cause fear or danger, and possession of a
firearm when prohibited for life...'

So the article indicates a connection between the men who killed the security guard at the night-club.
The son of a radical cleric, the murdered security guard and the possession of a firearm, sounds simple.

But then why this?

'...The Met Police said the charges related to an incident at Fountain House at about 05:35 GMT in which no
firearm was discharged.

The force added the alleged offences were not linked to Mr Simionov's stabbing -which happened at about 05:30
-or the stabbing of three other people at the event...'

BBC:

The Daily Star make the incident a little clearer...

'...But officers say the charges have been brought in connection with a separate incident at
the same location on New Year’s Day...'

But still get their raunchy habit in!

'...Tudor was manning the door to an alleged private sex party when the attack took place on
New Year's Day...'

The Daily Star:

There's more to this incident than meets the eye.

[BIAD]

Like all mainstream medias, the same reports are displayed and usually in the same order.
Conclusions are drawn within a minute-or-two by the presenter's presentation of the information and we all are
supposed to confidently nod that everything that's offered is true and unbiased.

Except... it's what is missing that can have a bearing too.

These days, we're asked to believe that white men are oppressing women at every opportunity and if an article
offers room for such a suggestion, the mainstream media will not falter in driving their agenda onward.
These masters of narrative also believe that Governments should control your children's conduct and once again,
if there's an opening to tell you that they know better, they'll tell you.

The report below is a harmless one, the British Medical Journal -now called 'The BMJ', says its findings show that
an average use of devices -such as cell phones and tablets that have screens, cause little harm to the young in
general.

But there are other screens, namely television screens and oddly enough, this BBC article misses certain findings of
the same BMJ out of their account.
I wonder why?

Worry less about children's screen use, parents told.

'There is little evidence screen use for children is harmful in itself, guidance from leading paediatricians says.
Parents should worry less as long as they have gone through a checklist on the effect of screen time on their
child, it says.



While the guidance avoids setting screen time limits, it recommends not using them in the hour before bedtime.
Experts say it is important that the use of devices does not replace sleep, exercising and time with family.

It was informed by a review of evidence published at the same time in the BMJ Open medical journal, and follows
a debate around whether youngsters should have time on devices restricted.
Meanwhile, a separate study has found that girls are twice as likely to show signs of depressive symptoms linked
to social media use at age 14 compared with boys...'

LINK:
See...? there's a link to the open medical journal where a diligent parent can check to see the results of these tests,
but there's no link to where the evidence is that girls are worse victims than boys.
And I'd wager the Journalist's finger tarried over the keyboard on whether to adjust the statement to 'white boys'!

'...'No evidence of being toxic'
The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH), which oversees the training of specialists in child
medicine, has produced the guidance for under-18s.

It said there was no good evidence that time in front of a screen is "toxic" to health, as is sometimes claimed.
The review of evidence found associations between higher screen use and obesity and depression...'

Remember that second sentence, I'll post at the bottom what the BMJ actually said.

'....But the college looked at this and said it was not clear from the evidence if higher screen use was causing these
problems or if people with these issues were more likely to spend more time on screens.

The review was carried out by experts at University College London, including RCPCH president Prof Russell Viner.
The college said it was not setting time limits for children because there was not enough evidence that screen time
was harmful to child health at any age.

Instead, it has published a series of questions to help families make decisions about their screen time use:

Is your family's screen time under control?
Does screen use interfere with what your family want to do?
Does screen use interfere with sleep?
Are you able to control snacking during screen time?

Dr Max Davie, officer for health promotion for the RCPCH, said phones, computers and tablets were a "great way to
explore the world", but parents were often made to feel that there was something "indefinably wrong" about them.

He said: "We want to cut through that and say 'actually if you're doing OK and you've answered these questions of yourselves
and you're happy, get on and live your life and stop worrying'.
"But if there are problems and you're having difficulties, screen time can be a contributing factor."

Dr Russell Viner, president of the RCPCH, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme "screens are part of modern life", adding:
"The genie is out of the bottle - we cannot put it back."...'

There's a segment on what parents say and recommendations of not using 'devices' that are obvious.
The final few sentences are where the majority of the mainstream media wriggle out of they've implied earlier and the BBC
is no exception.

'Social media and young people
The study on social media use and young people was carried out by experts at University College London and published in
EClinicalMedicine.
It involved nearly 11,000 young people answering questionnaires on their social media use, online harassment,
sleep patterns, self-esteem and body image...'

You can click on the link, but it doesn't lead to an academic page that has any bearing on the subject!
Here we go with the back-tracking

'...It is separate to the RCPCH guidance on screen use and the review that informed it, neither of which looked at social media
use. Experts not involved in the social media study said it added to existing evidence that heavy social media use may be harmful
for mental health.

But they called for more research to better understand if it causes depression, or if depressive people are more likely to use social
media excessively...'

BBC:

Which is strange considering the BBC stated: '...Meanwhile, a separate study has found that girls are twice as likely to show signs
of depressive symptoms linked to social media use at age 14 compared with boys...' But that was in the form of a dig at males and
not backed-up with science.

But all of this is about screens. Screens, screens screens. And is there a difference in effects when looking at different types of screens?

Here are some other findings the report showed and oddly enough, not offered in the above article.

'The great majority of findings related to television screentime. Tremblay et al 10 reported a moderate association between
television screetime and adiposity [obesity] measures, identified in 94/119 cross-sectional studies and 19/28 longitudinal
studies.

van Ekris et al reported strong evidence for a positive relationship between TV viewing time and incidence of overweight/obesity
over time in three high-quality studies and in three low-quality studies. Carson et al reported that unfavourable adiposity was
associated with television screentime in 14/16 longitudinal studies, 2/2 case-control studies and 58/71 cross-sectional studies.

LeBlanc et al 18 reported that the association between television screentime and unfavourable adiposity measures could be seen
at all ages, but that evidence quality was low for infants and moderate for toddlers and preschoolers...'

'...We conclude there is moderately strong evidence that higher television screentime is associated with greater adiposity,
but that there is insufficient evidence for an association with overall screentime or non-television screentime.
There is moderate evidence that a dose-response association is present for screentime or television screentime.
However, there is no strong evidence for a particular threshold in hours of screentime...'

'...We conclude there is moderate evidence for an association between screentime, particularly television screentime,
and higher energy intake and less healthy diet quality including higher intake of energy and lower intake of healthy food
groups...'

You'll notice that in the BBC article, they never used the word 'television' and stuck with 'devices'.
We tend not to think of a television-set being a device, more like a piece of furniture or appliance.

Screen time on a television comes-off as a negative and British Broadcasting Company failed to show
their readers and viewers that... I wonder why?!!!

[BIAD]

Isn't it strange?

Sky News's report on the Manchester stabbing incident.
'...A 25-year-old man has been detained under the Mental Health Act and is
now in a secure medical facility...'
SOURCE:

The BBC's report on the London's West End incident.
'...A 26-year-old man is in custody at a central London police station...' and
'...A 34-year-old man initially arrested on suspicion of attempted murder has
been released on bail until mid-January, the police said...'
BBC:

Sky News's report on the Texas seven-year-od shooting incident.
'...The suspect is described as a bearded white man, possibly in his 40s...'
Sky News:

BBC's report on the Texas seven-year-od shooting incident.
'...Authorities say the unidentified gunman is a bearded white male in his 40s,
wearing a red sweatshirt...'
Beebs:

(Caveat. Not a racial slur, merely a comment on the political correctness that infests the media)

Remember I posted the above?
The reason was because of a developing incident where a 51 year-old man was on a train in the UK
with his young son when the father was attacked by an unknown person and violently stabbed to death.

The mainstream media reported it and used words like 'suspect' and 'attacker' whilst refraining from
describing the person -who for a while, was still on the loose. In some of the media, they said the
suspect 'wore black clothing, but to his skin-colour... it remained unsaid.

The BBC's latest report is this:

Surrey train stabbing: Suspect arrested along with a woman

'The suspect being sought for the stabbing of a man on a train in Surrey has been arrested, British Transport Police say.
A 51-year-old man died after suffering multiple knife wounds during a "vicious fight" on board a Guildford to London
train on Friday afternoon.

He was killed in front of his 14-year-old son.
The victim and the attacker both got on the train at London Road station in Guildford at about 13:00 GMT.
Police believe the pair were not known to each other.

The suspect was detained at an address in the Farnham area at around 06:00 GMT on suspicion of murder.
A 27-year-old woman was also arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender.
More than 40 officers from British Transport Police are working alongside Surrey Police and on Saturday morning the
forces were still searching for the murder weapon between Horsley and Farnham.

Assistant Chief Constable Sean O'Callaghan told BBC Breakfast: "I can confirm this morning that we have arrested
who we believe to be the suspect in relation to this violent offence and also another person involved as well.
"Those arrests have taken place in an address in the Surrey area this morning."

Mr O'Callaghan described the sequence of events detectives know to have taken place on the train.

'Unprovoked violent attack'
He said: "We now know from enquiries we've been doing overnight and from witnesses that the two men
were involved in a verbal discussion, that discussion lasted three to four minutes.
"It moved through one carriage from where they first boarded into another carriage, and that argument
escalated to the unprovoked violent attack that sadly resulted in the death."

Mr O'Callaghan also said detectives are confident with the arrests they have made and no-one else was
being sought in connection with the killing at this time. He said: "This is, as far as we can see at this moment
in time, an incident that has occurred when two men have been talking to one another, opposed to a random
attack on a train.

"Travelling on the train is still an extremely safe thing to do. Very few crimes actually occur on the train itself.
"In terms of violent offences, it's one violent offence for approximately one million passenger journeys, so the
chances of being a victim of violence on a train in England, Scotland and Wales is still extremely low."...'

BBC:

The last comment tells you how far we in the UK have fallen when advice that you're probably safe from
attacks on a train and ignores that it smacks of third-world behavior.

But anyway, there was no description of the victim or the attacker and I wondered why.

The Daily Star reported on the same day as the BBC's article, but the arrest hadn't happened yet.

Train murder as dad killed in front of son, 14 – hunt for knifeman ongoing

'..."The suspect is a black man, in his 20s to 30s, approximately 6ft tall and of slim build with a beard,
believed to be dressed all in black with white trainers.

"At this moment I would ask the public to please contact police urgently by calling 999 if they see anyone
matching this description – please do not approach him."...'

Daily Star:

And there it is. The fear of negatively portraying a no-borders, social-accepting diversity belief demands
that the BBC lies to its readers. No warnings that the fleeing suspect was dangerous because when the
whole story is revealed, it may imply all black people are dangerous and that's the thought-process of the
child-like deceptive British Broadcasting Company.

A description may have aided the suspect's capture, but political correctness requires a higher standing
than public safety in the BBC's eyes. This is why the Donald says 'Fake News'.

[Mystic Wanderer]

The Deep State Propaganda has gotten so bad it caused a senior reporter to quit at NBC, one of the top fake news sites.

A senior NBC reporter has quit the news network over their obsession with promoting pro-war Deep State propaganda twenty-four hours a day.

I'm glad to see there are still some people who refuse to "sell their soul to the devil" all in the name of putting an extra dollar in their pocket.

William M. Arkin, a veteran national security reporter, wrote a scathing farewell message to his colleagues, warning them that NBC has given endless war and ‘destructive’ intelligence agencies a free pass due to their around-the-clock anti-Trump hysteria.


Rt.com reports: Arkin had a number of pointed words to share with his fellow reporters before his last day of work at NBC on Friday – 2,228, to be exact. In his farewell memo – which reads more like a manifesto than a goodbye –the veteran muckraker accused NBC of peddling “ho-hum reporting” that “essentially condones” endless American military presence in the Middle East and North Africa. He also took the network to task for not reporting “the failures of the generals and national security leaders,” essentially becoming “a defender of the government against Trump” and a “cheerleader for open and subtle threat mongering.”

Long-time reporter @warkin leaves NBC & MSNBC, emails statement saying these outlets are captive to the national security state & devoted to Endless War: "defenders of the government against Trump, cheerleader for open and subtle threat mongering"- reflexively pro-war pic.twitter.com/338oI1LoYk
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) January 2, 2019

Arkin expressed concern that NBC’s infatuation with the “Trump circus” has distracted journalists from pressing stories that need to be told.

“I’m more worried about how much we are missing. Hence my desire to take a step back and think why so little changes with regard to America’s wars,” he wrote.
He continued by questioning the media’s fanatical opposition to Trump’s desire to improve relations with Russia, denuclearize North Korea, and withdraw from Syria.

“I’m alarmed at how quick NBC is to mechanically argue the contrary, to be in favor of policies that just spell more conflict and more war. Really? We shouldn’t get out Syria? We shouldn’t go for the bold move of denuclearizing the Korean peninsula? Even on Russia, though we should be concerned about the brittleness of our democracy that it is so vulnerable to manipulation, do we really yearn for the Cold War? And don’t even get me started with the FBI: What? We now lionize this historically destructive institution?” he quipped.

If anyone is qualified to critique NBC’s military and national security reporting, it would be Arkin. The veteran journalist has worked for the network intermittently for the last 30 years, and co-authored a seminal Washington Post investigation revealing the dangerous rise of America’s security state.

My guess is Mattis 2020. On Syria and Afghanistan (and North Korea) Trump has the right instincts. And on national security stagnation, both in warfare and in thought. Again, he has no ability to implement or even learn but the enemies of Trump shouldn’t become the war party.
— William M. Arkin (@warkin) December 21, 2018

Arkin has also been a vocal critic of America’s wars in the Middle East, and distinguished himself as one of the few mainstream journalists to question the fictitious WMD rolled out to justify war with Iraq.
Many on social media expressed their gratitude to Arkin for shining a light on the media’s complacency – and complicity – as America’s military and national security apparatus operate with near impunity both at home and abroad.

“Very useful to have all our well known suspicions confirmed from inside. there’s a reason revolutions make a priority to take over the tv stations,” one Twitter user noted. Geopolitical analyst Emma Ashford noted that Arkin’s letter was “a very fair criticism of most mainstream news networks.”

very useful to have all our well known suspicions confirmed from inside. there's a reason revolutions make a priority to take over the tv stations
— tim russo (@TimRussoCLE) January 2, 2019

There are journalists out there doing great work on these issues, but this strikes me as a very fair criticism of most mainstream news networks.
Too much attention to the "Trump circus," not enough to covering or challenging American wars abroad. https://t.co/3Y7HZudbZM
— Emma Ashford (@EmmaMAshford) January 3, 2019

Arkin finished his farewell roast by detailing some of his writing projects currently in the works, including an “extended essay about national security and why we never seem to end our now perpetual state of war.”

“There is lots of media critique out there, tons of analysis of leadership and the Presidency. But on the state of our national security? Not so much. Hopefully I will find myself thinking beyond the current fire and fury and actually suggest a viable alternative. Wish me luck.”

Source

[BIAD]

William Arkin is bang-on the money, I just have to wonder how many like him are
still in the news-rooms, but don't have the balls to walk.

[BIAD]

After capture -and avoiding arrest with the aid of a female friend, the BBC reported on the quick court case.
However, on the television broadcast the auto-cue was set at:
'...suspect accused of an alleged stabbing' instead of 'Darren Pencille accused of stabbing the victim'!

So at least we know who types this stuff... leftists!

Surrey train stabbing: Murder accused appears in court

'A man killed on a train in front of his teenage son was stabbed nine times, a court has heard.
Lee Pomeroy, 51, from Guildford, died in the attack on a train near the town on Friday.


Darren Pencille -with his homeless belongings around him.

Darren Pencille, 35, of no fixed abode, made two separate court appearances on Monday charged
with murder and possessing an offensive weapon.

He told Staines magistrates: "Innocent until proven guilty," adding: "I'm paranoid. I'm hearing voices."


Chelsea Mitchell is charged with assisting an offender.

He later appeared at Guildford Crown Court, along with Chelsea Mitchell, 27, from Willbury Road in
Farnham, who is accused of assisting an offender by helping Mr Pencille leave the scene and change
his appearance...'

BBC:

The rest is in regards of the victim... the one that was stabbed to death, that is.


Lee Pomeroy was on a train with his 14-year-old son when he was stabbed.

[Mystic Wanderer]

From above post:

He told Staines magistrates: "Innocent until proven guilty," adding: "I'm paranoid. I'm hearing voices."

There's those "voices" again. 

Q posted about this today; not this story, but the MKUltra programs.  Interesting!
Click on the links in the Q post to read articles on this.

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 82bacc No.4639875
Jan 7 2019 00:24:44 (EST) https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7920010/ci...documents/
Program dev ongoing under offshore [not domestic] 'tangent' agency?
Covert funding?
Animals > Humans
Humans 1988
71% avg success rate.
Targeted (mental) 'criteria' designated as [ , ].
Mental institutions & therapists > 'program-specialists'…..
Cocktail regimen 4x daily brain intercept [administered by ]
Hint:
https://ncats.nih.gov/pubs/features/brai...als-action
WIA military personnel targets of the program?
PTSD+
Clandestine Black OPs > zero affiliation (non_stick)
Something out of a movie?
Fiction?
The hole is deep.
Q