Active Shooter in Vegas! - Printable Version +- Rogue-Nation3 (https://rogue-nation3.com) +-- Forum: General and Breaking News Events (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-11.html) +--- Forum: Breaking News (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-12.html) +--- Thread: Active Shooter in Vegas! (/thread-2806.html) |
RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Mystic Wanderer - 10-05-2017 Going over this thread from the start, I see they are already taking down some of the important videos we've posted. Guess you better hurry and watch what has been posted before they are gone too. Here's one that I think was posted earlier, but was removed. Watch it before it disappears again! RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Mystic Wanderer - 10-05-2017 This is just a theory, mind you, but an interesting one that could answer some questions. Hurry and watch it before it's removed. Las Vegas Shooter At Mandalay Bay Hotel Part Of FBI Undercover Sting Operation That Went BAD!
RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Mystic Wanderer - 10-05-2017 An interesting question, why were the lights left on while the shooter was active, but as soon as he stopped the lights were turned off? People couldn't see where to go, EMTs couldn't see where they were needed. Was someone on the ground involved to help to cause more chaos? If you have a Face Book account, you can watch this video, but I warn you, it is VERY GRAPHIC! WATCH AT YOUR OWN DISCRETION!
RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Mystic Wanderer - 10-05-2017 WHOA!!! Anyone know how to download YT videos before they're deleted? PLEASE WATCH THIS, AND IF YOU CAN DOWNLOAD IT TO SAVE, PLEASE DO. RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Ninurta - 10-05-2017 (10-05-2017, 03:51 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: The company describe themselves as “a premier global advisory firm focused on security and risk management. Whose professionals include former Cabinet-level officials, senior intelligence and national security officers, private-equity CEOs, and experienced investment bankers from the most distinguished Wall Street firms. From my perspective, that phrase right there is the most troubling - "for those organizations that require tactical security support". "Tactical" implies operators on the ground, black-suited trigger pullers. Black suited trigger pullers who are NOT sworn law enforcement. That is a potentially troubling development. I was affiliated with an organization that could be a model for what they have in mind a few years ago when I was doing armed security. That organization deployed both sworn law enforcement and unsworn security at the same time, in the same vehicles. The rationale was that as unsworn "citizens", the armed security could do things the sworn officers could not, and conversely, the sworn officers had powers the security did not - for example, powers of arrest. On the other hand, the security officers did not have limited jurisdiction as the sworn officers did. That could be conceived of as a match made in hell, if abused. The difference is, what I was involved in was on a small scale, purely local. On a national scale, that could become a national nightmare. It's what I was afraid DHS was heading towards with their "Fusion Centers", and lo and behold, here is Chertoff and company still pushing it. That could potentially be bad, very bad - what amounts to mercenaries operating on domestic soil with legal backing. I've done that sort of thing, both domestically and foreign, but back then if it was overseas it was "employment", while the same thing done here was "criminal activity". In the 90's, that began to change with this merger, albeit on a small scale, of governmental power with private freedom of action lending government legitimacy to private action. I'm telling you right now that on a small scale that is not too problematic, as oversight is much easier, but on a larger scale it can be disastrous, as there is much, MUCH less oversight possible, and accountability goes out the window. One thing to remember is that those trigger-pullers are not the only trigger pullers on the block. there are others around who've been there, done that, set the t-shirt on fire and walked away... but that doesn't mean they forgot everything they ever knew. We should expect opposition to arise if they try to put a plan like that in motion, perhaps really rowdy opposition, because when the shit gets deep, there are those around who will try to swim or at least keep their heads above drowning level, and some of those know how to do it just as well as the ones trying to push it. . RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Ninurta - 10-05-2017 (10-05-2017, 05:56 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: WHOA!!! Anyone know how to download YT videos before they're deleted? Downloaded and archived offsite. It's plausible, and would explain some intractable questions, but not really likely as presented, in my opinion. Thee are too many internal inconsistencies in the alleged "information", and that makes it highly suspect, at least to me. . RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Ninurta - 10-05-2017 (10-05-2017, 04:30 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: Going over this thread from the start, I see they are already taking down some of the important videos we've posted. Questionable presentation. The way it is chopped up and edited, without connecting video between the two sets of shots, smacks of an edit job to promote an agenda and prevent people from actually connecting the dots. The continuous videos I've watched of the event all and invariably sound exactly like it would sound of one was being shot at from a distance - the crack and thump of an actual gunfire incident. I'm not discounting the possibility of multiple shooters, but what I've seen so far of CONTINUOUS videos do not indicate such. Only the chopped up and edited ones would lead anyone to that conclusion, which makes me wonder if the "near shots" in those particular videos may not have been dubbed in to promote an agenda. . RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Ninurta - 10-05-2017 (10-05-2017, 05:35 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: An interesting question, why were the lights left on while the shooter was active, but as soon as he stopped the lights were turned off? Thanks for the link, but I won't be watching it. Although I've got a Facebook account, I've never been able to watch video on it, probably because of my anti-scripting measures. Furthermore, Facebook is a known tracker and data miner, and this could likely be a click-bait data miner, to find out just WHO is looking for videos such as this one. For what purpose, I can only speculate. P.S. - Youtube tracks you, too, through your Google account if you have it active. . RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Mystic Wanderer - 10-05-2017 (10-05-2017, 08:27 PM)Ninurta Wrote:(10-05-2017, 04:30 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: Going over this thread from the start, I see they are already taking down some of the important videos we've posted. @"Ninurta" Here is the unedited version. I have to say, it sounds too close to be the same gunfire to me. I'm no expert though. You might be right, but... I don't know. RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Mystic Wanderer - 10-05-2017 (10-05-2017, 08:35 PM)Ninurta Wrote:(10-05-2017, 05:35 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: An interesting question, why were the lights left on while the shooter was active, but as soon as he stopped the lights were turned off? Yeah, it wasn't the kind that offers a link to share here. You have to copy/paste the link into the address bar to get it to come up. Then you have to click on a link that says to uncover the video, where it warns of it's graphic nature. It was just showing how the lights were turned on after the singer left the stage, making it easy for the gunman to see his targets, then they turned them off after he stopped shooting, making it too dark to see how to help people... or, maybe 'someone' in the crowd needed to escape? RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - BIAD - 10-05-2017 Quote:Las Vegas sheriff: gunman planned to survive and may have had help.SOURCE: Regarding Marilou Danley. Quote:'...Another neighbor, Susan Page, who moved next door to the couple this summer, said she hadIsn't it odd that she 'packed up' her car...? Is this how millionaires behave?! SOURCE: RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Mystic Wanderer - 10-05-2017 From @"BIAD"'s post, Quote:He said investigators were, however, pressing to find others who may have been involved. TRUE, but it sounds like Rouse is trying to take the public's attention off the idea that there was more than one shooter, as the sheriff suggested. Wonder why? Could it be the FBI "sting gone wrong" could be true? I doubt ANY agent is going to step up and speak the truth if that's the case, therefore, NO FACTS will be available to work with and this shooting will remain a mystery to those who are asleep. RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Ninurta - 10-06-2017 (10-05-2017, 09:29 PM)BIAD Wrote:Quote:On the third week of August, Paddock left the house. Soon after, Page said, Danley packed upIsn't it odd that she 'packed up' her car...? Is this how millionaires behave?! Yes, that is odd. It's odd, at least, for someone who believed they were merely going on a vacation to visit home. That, coupled with the $100,000 dollars Paddock wired to the Philippines so that Danley "and her family could buy a house" would seem to indicate that she may have known more than she is letting on. It does sound, on the face of it, like there was a plan in place, even back then. RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Ninurta - 10-06-2017 (10-05-2017, 10:12 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: From @"BIAD"'s post, Well, to be fair, Lombardo didn't say anything at all about "more than one shooter". All he suggested was that Paddock either "had help" or was a "superman". "Help" doesn't necessarily mean more shooters, and more shooters would probably be counterproductive in this scenario, although it is certainly possible. People to run interference, create confusion, and move materiel would be a lot more useful than another shooter or two. 80% of any army are people who are "helping", for example in logistics, rather than people who are shooting. An example of "people who are helping" are whomever was calling in all the false reports of mass shooters here, there, and everywhere in the two weeks leading up to the shooting and intensely doing so that night, just before the shooting. .That creates confusion among the first responders, and draws them off to other areas so that the shooting can proceed unimpeded. . RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Mystic Wanderer - 10-06-2017 @"Ninurta" said, Quote:Well, to be fair, Lombardo didn't say anything at all about "more than one shooter". All he suggested was that Paddock either "had help" or was a "superman". "Help" doesn't necessarily mean more shooters, and more shooters would probably be counterproductive in this scenario, although it is certainly possible. People to run interference, create confusion, and move materiel would be a lot more useful than another shooter or two. 80% of any army are people who are "helping", for example in logistics, rather than people who are shooting. Yes, you are right. I made a poor choice of words. "Helpers" is a much better description. However, there are multiple witnesses who say they know beyond a shadow of a doubt, 100%, that there was more than one shooter. And then, there's that guy that got shot behind that building where a bullet couldn't have reached at that angle coming from the hotel window. So, I guess I just had "shooters" on my mind when I chose that word. RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Mystic Wanderer - 10-06-2017 And the plot thickens... The Vegas Plot Thickens: The Connection Between The Shooter And An Intelligence Agency Quote:On the surface, the tweet doesn’t say much. But how much can Mike Toke really say in a limited amount of characters? But what he does manage is enough to get anyone seeking the truth to follow all these leads and look into everything that the media and our government continues to hide from us. It’s what’s embedded in the tweet that counts. Why indeed? But, the rabbit hole goes deeper... Quote:There is little to be known about Volant LLC., in Roanoke, Virginia. A company big enough to have a plane should have a website, at least that would be the assumption. But a Google search netted very little information other than they provide “business services.” But Volant Associates is a completely different matter. That’s your defense contractor. And their website says they are located in Chantilly, VA, which wouldn’t be too far from Volant LLC. in Roanoke. And a quick Google search of that verifies that the two cities are only 219 miles apart. So is Volant LLC., a cover company for the defense contractor? Is this a coincidence? Source Hmm... this goes along with the post I made that Paddock could have been working on a sting with the FBI. RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - BIAD - 10-06-2017 Good catch, Mystic. It's a slender trail... but it's a trail. RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Mystic Wanderer - 10-06-2017 This video on Twitter may show a second shooter in the crowd. It's hard to make out. What do you think? Could this be what happened to Paddock's rifle that he bought on his way to Las Vegas that disappeared? $600 Rifle He Purchased on Way to Vegas Is Missing Click on this link to see video: https://twitter.com/B_Rich33NO/status/915578346658058240 RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Mystic Wanderer - 10-07-2017 Quote:Investigators are looking into two key pieces of evidence that seem to suggest that Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock was not entirely alone in his Mandalay Bay hotel room. Hmmm... RE: Active Shooter in Vegas! - Mystic Wanderer - 10-07-2017 VERY INTERESTING!
|