This is Good and Obama is out of Country right now I think.
If this is Factual and Trump goes forward with this an orders a full investigation and prosecution.
Obama my just stay out of Our Country,,,, That's be Good Enough For me!
Quote:The Washington Post's Bob Woodward warned on Wednesday that there are people from the Obama administration who could be facing criminal charges for unmasking the names of Trump transition team members from surveillance of foreign officials.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said earlier that he had briefed Trump on new information, unrelated to an investigation into Russian activities, that suggested that several members of Trump's transition team and perhaps Trump himself had their identities "unmasked" after their communications were intercepted by U.S. intelligence officials.
That is Illegal!!!!!
Quote:During an interview on Fox News, Woodward said that if that information about the unmasking is true, "it is a gross violation."
He said it isn't Trump's assertion, without proof, that his predecessor wiretapped Trump Tower that is of concern, but rather that intelligence officials named the Americans being discussed in intercepted communications.
"You can learn all kinds of things from diplomats gossiping, because that's what occurs. Under the rules, and they are pretty strict, it's called minimization.
You don't name the American person who is being discussed," Woodward said. He noted that there are about 20 people in the intelligence community who, for intelligence reasons, can order this "minimization" be removed.
Obama is One of those 20.
Quote:"But the idea that there was intelligence value here is really thin," Woodward said. "It's, again, down the middle, it is not what Trump said, but this could be criminal on the part of people who decided, oh, let's name these people."
He drove the point home, adding that "under the rules, that name is supposed to be blanked out, and so you've got a real serious problem potentially of people in the Obama administration passing around this highly classified gossip."
Parliament shooting: Police officer 'stabbed'.
(Thursday, 22nd March 2017) 'A police officer has been stabbed in the Houses of Parliament in central London, in what police are treating as a terrorist incident.
Commons Leader David Lidington told MPs [Members of Parliament] the "alleged assailant was shot by armed police". There are also reports of as many as five people being "mowed down" on nearby Westminster Bridge.
MPs said they had heard three or four gunshots. A Downing Street source said Prime Minister Theresa May was "OK".
Prime Minister Theresa May was seen being ushered into a silver Jaguar car as what sounded like gunfire rang out at Parliament during the incident. Staff inside Parliament were told to stay inside their offices.
Tom Peck, political editor for the Independent, tweeted: "There was a loud bang. Screams. Commotion. Then the sound of gunshots. Armed police everywhere."
Press Association political editor Andrew Woodcock witnessed the scenes unfolding from his office window overlooking New Palace Yard. "I heard shouts and screams from outside and looked out, and there was a group of maybe 40 or 50 people running round the corner from Bridge Street into Parliament Square.
"They appeared to be running away from something...' SOURCE:
Update:
16:10pm:
Bomb squad called to Parliament
A planned evacuation of Parliament has been halted after an announcement was made
saying there was a suspicious package in a vehicle and the bomb squad had been called.
16:12pm:
London Eye in lockdown.
The London Eye tourist attraction, just across the Thames from Parliament, said it was on
lockdown following the attack. A spokesman said: "At present we are holding all of our guests
within our attractions as per tried and tested security procedures."
16:13pm:
One dead in Westminster incident doctors say.
One woman has died and a number of others have been hurt - including some with
"catastrophic" injuries - in the incident on Westminster Bridge, a junior doctor at St
Thomas' Hospital has said.
16:22pm:
'I saw a couple of bodies on the ground'
Matt Haikin, 44, from London, said he was in shock after seeing the aftermath of the crash
on the bridge.
He said: "I just saw a car that had clearly driven off the road into the fence outside Parliament.
"As I went past I noticed there was a body next to it and quite a lot of blood and people standing
around. "Fairly shortly after I heard some shots, at which point it was clear it wasn't just an accident,
something else was going on."
He then moved to look through the Palace of Westminster gates and saw "a lot of people, people
in uniform, I think I saw a couple of bodies on the ground, I couldn't tell you if they'd been asked to
lie down or if they were injured".
I don't know who this man's sources are, but he seems to believe that James Comey is a child molester.
Even if it's not true, he is quite entertaining to watch.
Is this why Comey won't go after Hillary, Bill, and Obama? Could it be because they have him on tape doing something that could send him to prison?
Man, oh man... the rabbit hole just keeps getting deeper and deeper!
Quote:The conspiracy about the moon is no longer that humans never visited. In fact, most conspiracy theorists now believe that not only was the moon visited by the United States but also that there are alien lifeforms on the surface of the moon.
On May 25, 1961, President John F. Kennedy established for the United States the goal of, before the end of that decade, to put a man on the Moon and bring it safely back to Earth. But, as with most of the new adventures of mankind, there have been some mishaps.
One of the most intriguing questions about the moon is why NASA did not send more astronauts after the Apollo missions and why it does not intend to do so in the future. Could the Moon have given away all its secrets? Or was it that we humans were forbidden by any other intelligence to step there again?
Source
Two twin towers almost 2 miles high?! I wonder if the giants moved to the moon?
'The British government has announced a cabin baggage ban on laptops on direct passenger flights to the UK from Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, Tunisia and Saudi Arabia.
The ban, which also applies to tablets and DVD players, follows a similar US move affecting eight countries.
Downing Street said it followed talks on air security and was "necessary, effective and proportionate". US officials said bombs could be hidden in a series of devices. The ban applies to any device larger than 16cm long, 9.3cm wide or 1.5cm deep.
It includes smart phones, but most fall inside these limits...'
Stated on the BBC in a serious manner without the mainstream sarcasm that the
Trump administration endured. It's obvious now that something was in the air
when the US travel ban was offered.
'...While the US government cited unspecified "threats" in its announcement, the prime minister's official spokesman declined to discuss whether the new rules were prompted by specific intelligence...' SOURCE:
Another account: 'US-bound passengers travelling from eight countries will be banned from carrying most electronic devices.
An estimated 50 flights per day, all on foreign carriers, from 10 airports in Turkey, the Middle East and North Africa, will be affected by the new rules.
The electronics ban will be enforced on flights from airports in Amman, Jordan; Kuwait City, Kuwait; Cairo, Egypt; Istanbul, Turkey; Jeddah and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Casablanca, Morocco; Doha, Qatar; and Dubai and Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates.
"The US Government is concerned about terrorists' ongoing interest in targeting commercial aviation, including transportation hubs over the past two years," th Department of Homeland Security said.
"Evaluated intelligence indicates that terrorist groups continue to target commercial aviation, to include smuggling explosive devices in various consumer items.
"All passengers flying through and from these locations will have to place electronic devices that are larger than a cell phone/smartphone in their checked bags regardless of the passenger's citizenship."
Officials said no US-based airlines have nonstop flights from those cities to the United States and no US carriers are affected.
Turkey has confirmed it is one of the nations affected and has said it will try to get the US to reverse the move...' SOURCE:
Oh good, another step up in technology so we all have to run out and buy the latest gadget. Can't be seen walking around with last years outdated phone/technology, now can we?
But, is it worth the price we will pay health wise?
Of course the technology industry is going to throw out all the attractive ways these devices will make your life better, leaving out how much more harmful the 5G is than what we have now.
For instance...
Quote:The goal is to have far higher speeds available, and far higher capacity per sector, at far lower latency than 4G. The standards bodies involved are aiming at 20Gbps speeds and 1ms latency, at which point very interesting things begin to happen.
The key here isn't speed, it's capacity. 5G may give cellular carriers enough capacity to offer truly unlimited home service plans, as the data caps on current wireless plans just don't work for home use. This could really increase home Internet competition in the US, where, according to a 2016 FCC report, 51 percent of Americans only have one option for 25Mbps or higher home Internet service.
And here is a page FULL of links explaining how 5G will simplify your life: LINK
Lovely, isn't it? :mediumdevil:
Enough on the that; let's look at how this new technology will affect our health...
You should already be aware of how WI-FI, ELF, and EMF affects your body in a negative way, not to mention the environment; the information has been out for several years. If you don't know, go read my previous threads:
Quote:The myth of melting ice and rising seas
By Sam Khoury
Special to The Nation
BANGKOK: -- This month The Nation along with every other news source in the world reported on a massive winter blizzard that struck the US northeast one week before the start of spring.
On that same day Agence France-Presse reported that global warming, caused by human activity, was causing arctic sea ice to melt. It seems not a week goes by without some article appearing in the mainstream media about some catastrophic ice melt or sea level rise, usually backed by some scientific research that may not be as definitive as suggested. Is there really a massive loss of global ice and surging rise in sea level? History and the most reliable scientific research say no.
Sea levels have been falling since the days of the Roman Empire – the world is dotted with former port cities that now lie kilometres inland. Visit the ancient Roman city of Ephesus in modern day Turkey and you can still see the road that led to the nearby harbour, only now there is no harbour. Ephesus used to overlook a bay, making it an ideal shipping port, but it has since become land. Along the Kent coast of England are more examples.
Romney was a port in the 700s. When the sea retreated and it could no longer be used for shipping, it died and was replaced by New Romney, which now lies 2 kilometres away from the sea. The Vikings prospered a thousand years ago at a time climatologists refer to as the Medieval Warm Period.
At that time the Belgian city of Bruges was a major port. A few hundred years later the sea had receded and Bruges lay near- abandoned for 400 years. About that time, in an increasingly swampy area up the coast, people started stacking mud in rows on which they built houses, giving them access to the sea in a Venice-like labyrinth. That settlement would become one of the gems of Western civilisation – Amsterdam.
To defend their theory, believers in global warming claim that these ports simply “silted up”, resulting in their downfall. But the historical evidence is overwhelming. In his book “The Mysterious Receding Seas”, structural engineer Richard Guy produces maps of Upper Egypt dating from the 1500s (some of the oldest maps on record).
They show there used to be an elaborate system of canals linking the Nile with the Red Sea that have since disappeared. In the intervening centuries attempts were made to dredge out these canals, but they failed as sea levels were just too low.
This brings us to the modern era. Has the global warming that has occurred since the post-medieval cool period ended or reversed this trend? The science is saying no. The articles read in the mainstream media are usually about arctic sea ice. This ice fluctuates between winter and summer and does not affect sea levels (use a glass of water, an ice cube and a marker to do the experiment). The articles also report melting glaciers, but there are many glaciers all over the world that are expanding, including some big ones.
And there are more than 150,000 glaciers on Earth. The two landmasses that really control sea levels are Greenland and Antarctica. A Nasa study of Antarctica using satellites concluded that the continent has been gaining approximately 100 billion tonnes of ice a year since the early 1990s while a group of 15 international scientists recently concluded that the Greenland ice sheet is now almost at its greatest extent for 7,500 years.
This suggests that the relationship between climate change and icing is complex: global warming doesn’t necessarily equate to melting ice and global cooling doesn’t automatically mean more ice, since the climate temperature has fluctuated since the Roman period whereas sea levels seem to have only gone down.
The answer to this riddle lies in the Earth’s recurring cycles of glacial periods – which last 90,000 years and see a steady accumulation of ice – and 10,000 year inter-glacial periods, which see rapid ice melt in the first part of those respective periods.
The last inter-glacial period started around 11,500 years ago. So current concern about modern-day cities going underwater are indeed realistic. But only about 90,000 years from now.
Quote:By Carey Wedler
Eight-hundred families of 9/11 victims and 1,500 first responders, along with others who suffered as a result of the attacks, have filed a lawsuit against Saudi Arabia over its alleged complicity in the 2001 terror attacks, according to an exclusive report by local New York outlet Pix 11.
The legal document, filed in a federal court in Manhattan, describes the Saudi role in the attacks. Pix 11reports:
Quote:The document details how officials from Saudi embassies supported hijackers Salem al-Hazmi and Khalid Al-Mihdhar 18 months before 9/11.
The officials allegedly helped them find apartments, learn English and obtain credit cards and cash. The documents state that the officials helped them learn how to blend into the American landscape.
This is one part of the article I really do not like... I guess the Petro dollar still needs Saudi support....
Quote:President Trump, for his part, previously criticized the Saudis, even acknowledging their alleged role in the 9/11 attacks when the 28-pages were released. However, since taking office, Trump has moved closer to Saudi Arabia, approving a weapons deal even Barack Obama rejected. Trump has also continued bombing Yemen, and Exxon Mobil, whose former CEO now serves at Trump’s secretary of state, has historical business ties to the Saudis. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson recently refused to acknowledge Saudi Arabia’s human rights abuses.
Quote:A Muslim was sitting next to Paddy on a plane. Paddy ordered a whisky. The stewardess asked the Muslim if he'd like a drink. He replied in disgust "I'd rather be raped by a dozen whores than let liquor touch my lips!" Paddy handed his drink back and said "Me too, I didn't know we had a choice!"
------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo------------
Murphy calls Easyjet to book a flight.
The operator asks "How many people are flying with you?"
Murphy replies "I don't know! It's your bloody plane!"
------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo------------
Paddy and Murphy are working on a building site.
Paddy says to Murphy "I'm gonna have the day off. I'm gonna pretend I'm mad!"
He climbs up the rafters, hangs upside down and shouts
"I'M A LIGHT BULB! .. I'M A LIGHT BULB!"
Murphy watches in amazement!
The Foreman shouts "Paddy you're mad, go home" So he leaves the site. Murphy starts packing his kit up to leave as well.
"Where the hell are you going?" asks the Foreman.
"I can't work in the friggin' dark!" says Murphy.
--------- -------- oOo --------- ---------
Paddy takes his new wife to bed on their wedding night.
She undresses, lies on the bed spread-eagled and says"You know what I want, don't you?" "Yeah," says Paddy. "The whole bed by the looks of it!"
--------oOo---------
Murphy is said to be shocked at finding out all his cows have Bluetongue. "Be Jeysus!" he said, "I didn't even know they had mobile phones!"
------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo------------
Mick and Paddy are reading head stones at a nearby cemetery.
Mick says "Crikey! There's a bloke here who was 152!"
Paddy says "What's his name?"
Mick replies "Miles, from London !" ------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo------------ Paddy, had long heard the stories of an amazing family tradition.
It appeared that his father, grandfather and great-grandfather had all been able to walk on water on their 18th birthday. On that special day, they'd each walked across the lake to the pub on the far side for their first legal drink. So when Paddy's, 18th birthday came 'round, he and his pal Mick, took a boat out to the middle of the lake, Paddy, stepped out of the boat . . . and nearly drowned!Mick just barely managed to pull him to safety. Furious and confused, Paddy, went to see his grandmother. 'Grandma,' he asked, "It's my 18th birthday, so why can't I walk 'cross the lake like my father, his father, and his father before him?" Granny looked deeply into Paddy's, troubled brown eyes and said, "Because your father, your grandfather and your great grandfather were all born in December, when the lake is frozen. You were born in August"!
![[Image: TSE2017usa_espenak_1421.jpg]](https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1608/TSE2017usa_espenak_1421.jpg)
![[Image: 700_a9e22291b199e92e84dd62feafff70c9.jpg?v=1490103477]](http://d38zt8ehae1tnt.cloudfront.net/images/news/700_a9e22291b199e92e84dd62feafff70c9.jpg?v=1490103477)
![[Image: 495291-intel-smart-cities.jpg?thumb=y&wi...height=456]](https://assets.pcmag.com/media/images/495291-intel-smart-cities.jpg?thumb=y&width=810&height=456)
