Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Charles Krauthammer: "The Clinton Foundation is Organized Crime."
#1
Quote:Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton



Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the
30k emails Hillary deleted from her private e-mail server very likely
had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a
conflict of interest.



The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at its finest.



Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as
a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually
prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. History.



This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and
repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free.



Here's how it works:





1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case, the Clintons
set it up in Canada.



2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian
charity.  In this case, over 1,000 did - contributing mega millions.
I'm sure they did this out of the goodness  of their hearts, and
expected nothing in return.  (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one
morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian
charity).



3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and
makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.



4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim
Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.



5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for
legitimate good works programs.  Unfortunately, experts believe this
is on the order of 10%.  Much of the balance goes to enrich the
Clintons, pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund
lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually tax free, which means you and I
are subsidizing it.



6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best
accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax
filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process
of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.



7. Net result - foreign money goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free
and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook
definition of money laundering. Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity"
includes as a principal one Frank Giustra.  Google him.  He is the guy
who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company
that somehow acquired massive U.S. Uranium interests and then sold
them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction
required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary
of State when the approval was granted.



As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels.
That poor chap was in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in
gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin
company.  Not legal, but not exactly putting U.S. Security at risk.



Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly
structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clintons, ask
yourself this:  Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a
Canadian charity?  Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation?
Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations
and countries in need?



This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.  Now
you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she
was willing to take.  Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled,
dishonest and criminal and they are Slick!
#2
(10-27-2016, 02:52 PM)727Sky Wrote: This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.  Now
you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she
was willing to take.  Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled,
dishonest and criminal and they are Slick!

Good post, Sky.
I think that we'll be astounded if the donor names ever come out.

Link to other post:
The Clinton Foundation....do people know ?
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#3
Wow, and that coming from Charles Krauthammer  says a lot in my opinion.

He's usually real cautious when speaking out in this manner.
But for him to just come right out and say it point blank how criminal the Clinton Foundation really is-- well, I have to give him an applause for that!! minusculeclap



Thanks for sharing!!
minusculethumbsup

a.k.a. 'snarky412'
 
        



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)