*Proof* Election Rigging By Hillary Clinton Camp *MSM in Panic Mode!*

[Grace]

I've never seen anything like this election either.  I mean, Hillary's lies and deception are right there in our face, and still some people want to vote for her.

I know, makes you wonder, right?


Yet, from all of the comments sections that I read, MOST see through her lies and deceptions and strongly disagree with the articles slinging mud at Trump. There are even a few commentators out there that call the article authors shills and take a decision to quit the newspaper website where it promotes it. You'd be surprised how many commentators have read the wikileaks leaks and have seen the Project Veritas videos...how many are denouncing Hillary for the fake that she is.

Hopefully, a majority will see through the smoke and mirrors and realize that they are being duped, all around.


I've never seen anything like this in my life either. Some are complaining about Trump possibly not accepting the nomination if Hillary wins as it would make democracy look bad (imagine!) and yet, those same people are demolishing values like they're on a mission... sledgehammer time ! Truth, Integrity, Honesty, Freedom, the 2nd Amendment - well the whole written thing for that matter, Justice, Democracy...it's all become one big joke.

I think people have gone insane.

[guohua]

New Podesta Email Exposes Dem Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples"

Earlier this morning we wrote about the obvious sampling bias in the latest ABC / Washington Post poll that showed a 12-point national advantage for Hillary.  Like many of the recent polls from Reuters, ABC and The Washington Post, this latest poll included a 9-point sampling bias toward registered democrats. 

"METHODOLOGY – This ABC News poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Oct. 20-22, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 874 likely voters. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 36-27-31 percent, Democrats - Republicans - Independents."

Of course, while democrats may enjoy a slight registration advantage of a couple of points, it is nowhere near the 9 points reflected in this latest poll. 
Meanwhile, we also pointed out that with huge variances in preference across demographics one can easily "rig" a poll by over indexing to one group vs. another.  As a quick example, the ABC / WaPo poll found that Hillary enjoys a 79-point advantage over Trump with black voters.  Therefore, even a small "oversample" of black voters of 5% could swing the overall poll by 3 full points.  Moreover, the pollsters don't provide data on the demographic mix of their polls which makes it impossible to "fact check" the bias...convenient.
[img=500x0]http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user230519/imageroot/2016/10/20/2016.10.23%20-%20ABC%20Poll%203_0.JPG[/img]
 
Now, for all of you out there who still aren't convinced that the polls are "adjusted", we present to you the following Podesta email, leaked earlier today, that conveniently spells out, in detail, exactly how to "manufacture" the desired data. The email starts out with a request for recommendations on "oversamples for polling" in order to "maximize what we get out of our media polling."

I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling.

The email even includes a handy, 37-page guide with the following poll-rigging recommendations.  In Arizona, over sampling of Hispanics and Native Americans is highly recommended:

Research, microtargeting & polling projects
-  Over-sample Hispanics
-  Use Spanish language interviewing. (Monolingual Spanish-speaking voters are among the lowest turnout Democratic targets)
-  Over-sample the Native American population

For Florida, the report recommends "consistently monitoring" samples to makes sure they're "not too old" and "has enough African American and Hispanic voters."  Meanwhile, "independent" voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first.

-  Consistently monitor the sample to ensure it is not too old, and that it has enough African American and Hispanic voters to reflect the state.
-  On Independents: Tampa and Orlando are better persuasion targets than north or south Florida (check your polls before concluding this). If there are budget questions or oversamples, make sure that Tampa and Orlando are included first.

Meanwhile, it's suggested that national polls over sample "key districts / regions" and "ethnic" groups "as needed."

-  General election benchmark, 800 sample, with potential over samples in key districts/regions
-  Benchmark polling in targeted races, with ethnic over samples as needed
-  Targeting tracking polls in key races, with ethnic over samples as needed

Read the rest of the article here: Source
very Revealing!

[senona]

Per guohua's article...

This ABC News poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Oct. 20-22, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 874 likely voters.

Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 36-27-31 percent, Democrats - Republicans - Independents."

First of all, my problem with these so-called polls is one, basing the votes of millions of Americans nationwide on a measly 874 total of folks that were polled.

And 2nd---out of the 879 people polled, how many picked were Dems versus how many Rep?

As stated above, the ratio is not quite equal.
No Siree, it leans more for the Dems which (((DUH)))  is naturally going to give Hillary the bigger lead.

36% Dems polled.
27% Reps polled.

Seems off balanced to me, not even including the 31% Independent either.




Nor do they know how many are 'claiming' to be for Hillary, when in actuality, the are closet Trump supporters.
Hiding for fear of ridicule and backlash.

Dems can be pretty damn nasty and vile, per some of the hate filled comments I have read.

[BIAD]

...Dems can be pretty damn nasty and vile, per some of the hate filled comments I have read.

Oh I agree.
[video=youtube]http:/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqYJRc0TJkQ/[/video]

[Jude]

And it goes on and on and on and on....




How much more before people start landing in jail? How much more before SHE is actually charged?

C'mon people...It's your Country...Take Charge, Take it back.

Jude

[guohua]

Did you see video II?

It's Rigged, The DNC and Hillary.

[727Sky]

[guohua]

Who has heard about the news of the Contribution by a Clinton Team Player to the Wife of the FBI that was leading the investigation against Hillary and her email accounts.

 Run it up to the 54 minute spot and listen.

[Jude]

#4 is out...

Enjoy!