03-24-2022, 06:13 PM
(03-24-2022, 05:06 PM)IAMTAT Wrote:(03-24-2022, 04:59 PM)ABNARTY Wrote: You bring up a good point. Leave the definition of a woman up to a biologist.
She could have gone all woke with a 10 minute pseudo-explanation but she didn't.
Unfortunately, I have no idea about her judicial record other than what is stated above. But I have lost faith in my institutions so if she is confirmed or not makes little difference to me.
So, if a case comes before the SC involving gender identity she will make her decision based on what established biological science says?
I'm skeptical.
The Woke should be very angry with her...but are silent.
I am with you. She sounds like a wokie in disguise but I have no evidence.
The only thing I have picked up on from my woke friends on FB is how brave she is. She's so brave. Sitting there in a chair, dodging questions. I guess just being alive and existing is enough to qualify as brave for them. Of course if I sat there in a chair, evading direct answers, I would be a Nazi. Very convenient.