07-10-2021, 10:26 AM
At first, I found the writing a bit dark and had a touch of certainty about it, the scope of what was stated -instead
of suggested, seemed narrow when you take in the 'on-the-ground' realities of how individual countries conduct
themselves.
When using the word 'patriots', one tends to look to the US as the backdrop of a situation and in this case, the
idea that Trump disrupted an assumed subversive agenda doesn't quite fly when one observes the day-today
political goals of other countries.
But the idea does have some merit.
I found the article illuminating in its directness of what 'could happen', but when applying rational thought to such
a possible future, relying on one man to slow and possibly halt such an ominous objective tends to lean towards
a type of cultism that places the writer's view no different than ones found in religious texts that orbit around a
single super-human character.
In regards of the paragraph:
"...Did you know your phone records all your conversations, constantly films you, and tracks your every move?
Have you ever wondered why you talk about something and then an hour later you see an ad on Facebook
promoting the very thing you talked about?
Or have you ever noticed how you made a phone call to somebody and a little bit later you see that person being
suggested as a friend on Facebook?..."
Ignoring the use of declarative questions and prosody in the language, a fairer-minded view would pitch these socially
-manipulating functions to show how much we've allowed such uses of algorithm to be taken as normal.
Internet companies do monitor users to 'milk' them of their information and use any technology available to gain these
goals, that's true... but the reality to stifle such control lies in the hands of the person being milked.
Just don't use the internet.
'Ah yes, but that means we're going without something because it's rigged' -I hear some say. Well, yes. The world got
along fine before the internet arrived and in reality, that's where the answer to all of the essay's warnings resides.
We're complaining about a situation that is built to benefit the companies and Governments that invest in them and
just like the power that once -and still does to some extent, existed within the television broadcasting and newspaper
realms, by abstaining from their use dwindles that strength.
The 'brain-washing' we often speak about doesn't dwell in the internet, it exists in the need to communicate via this
convenient medium. Sadly, we're surrounded at all sides in a 'laissez-faire' economic system that preys on our natural
yearning to interact with others. Darker minds may suggest the word 'interface'.
This works for cell phones too. The cost to manufacture such a wonderful device (think minerals, etc) far-outweighs the
actual price you pay for one these tools and in most cases, complaints derives from the price of tariffs.
And what is prominently advertised for these mobile telephones...? the camera application! Another utility to possibly
gather peripheral information about a customer that can be sold to businesses for other income.
Yep, the whole game is rigged and may have undercurrents of wanting trans-humanism to occur, but just like the lousy
broadcasts and laughable newspaper articles we often post on this website, the voices of these people who may wish
to change our lives can be weakened if we stop using the conduits they provided in the first place.
Klaus Schwab is a meme deliberately placed in his current position to play on some people's perception that the world
is ran in the manner the writer of the essay describes. He's a retired mechanical engineer, an author (who isn't these days!)
and an economist. His book 'The Fourth Industrial Revolution' is really about using automation to push people out of
employment for the sake of benefiting those who employ.
Not exactly a ground-breaking idea.
However, if one replaces 'people' with the word 'human', an interpretation of his book can be put in the light of trans-humanism,
replacing humans with a knock-off version of a robot. A cyborg. The obfuscation in the essay is where free-will comes into it
and again, another echo appears of how we've been strongly advised to take the anti-sniffles needle and it would be shameful
to follow your own decision-making abilities.
Independent thought isn't radical, it isn't something that demands the wearing of a Che Guevara T-shirt or be seen as a
glitch in the matrix, it's how normal societies behave daily.
The prose races ahead to assume we-as cattle, will just willingly go along with this futuristic dystopian calendar and no other
factors will effect the outcome unless 'we' take action. But life doesn't work like that, just ask the Japanese businesses that were
supposedly taking over the world in the eighties.
And there's the hint.
But the overall warning is worth listening to, I believe some-sort of new gulf is slowly being created by those who have the power
to influence others. I believe it's always been there, but with the category of the fiscally-independent bracket being allowed more
into the 'higher-breeding' authoritative areas of social-control, it's widening at a quicker rate.
'The Great Reset' is a meditative demand to harness -mainly the masses of the G7 countries, in the same manner that worked
for the establishment during the economic recessions of yesteryear, but mainly the 80-83 time. The concerns of money in the
higher halls of order takes second-stage to the control they held over these countries in areas of political-gain and social-authority
during that time.
Many of the young generations perceive an elusive impression of what they call 'freedom' in the model of doing what one wishes
and miss the background of the pragmatic everyday functioning to make a world where one can enjoy such an easy lifestyle.
It's an admiral goal, but requires hard work and some suffering.
If that thought-process can be twisted back in time to where these generations can see the need to put their shoulders to the wheel
instead of mildly discussing the virtues of someone else doing it, a possible paradigm-shift can occur where employment becomes
the ultimate personal-requirement and desperateness can be cultivated.
Even though this sort of social manipulation relied on the family-unit as a driver and now frowned upon, the dangling of employment
in front of someone who sees it as the only way to extinguish hopelessness, is a power well-used by those who seek such influence.
...............................................................
There's nothing wrong at manning the walls to watch for the evil invader, but that doesn't mean every sound from the bushes is
someone with pernicious thoughts on his mind.
(INMHO)
of suggested, seemed narrow when you take in the 'on-the-ground' realities of how individual countries conduct
themselves.
When using the word 'patriots', one tends to look to the US as the backdrop of a situation and in this case, the
idea that Trump disrupted an assumed subversive agenda doesn't quite fly when one observes the day-today
political goals of other countries.
But the idea does have some merit.
I found the article illuminating in its directness of what 'could happen', but when applying rational thought to such
a possible future, relying on one man to slow and possibly halt such an ominous objective tends to lean towards
a type of cultism that places the writer's view no different than ones found in religious texts that orbit around a
single super-human character.
In regards of the paragraph:
"...Did you know your phone records all your conversations, constantly films you, and tracks your every move?
Have you ever wondered why you talk about something and then an hour later you see an ad on Facebook
promoting the very thing you talked about?
Or have you ever noticed how you made a phone call to somebody and a little bit later you see that person being
suggested as a friend on Facebook?..."
Ignoring the use of declarative questions and prosody in the language, a fairer-minded view would pitch these socially
-manipulating functions to show how much we've allowed such uses of algorithm to be taken as normal.
Internet companies do monitor users to 'milk' them of their information and use any technology available to gain these
goals, that's true... but the reality to stifle such control lies in the hands of the person being milked.
Just don't use the internet.
'Ah yes, but that means we're going without something because it's rigged' -I hear some say. Well, yes. The world got
along fine before the internet arrived and in reality, that's where the answer to all of the essay's warnings resides.
We're complaining about a situation that is built to benefit the companies and Governments that invest in them and
just like the power that once -and still does to some extent, existed within the television broadcasting and newspaper
realms, by abstaining from their use dwindles that strength.
The 'brain-washing' we often speak about doesn't dwell in the internet, it exists in the need to communicate via this
convenient medium. Sadly, we're surrounded at all sides in a 'laissez-faire' economic system that preys on our natural
yearning to interact with others. Darker minds may suggest the word 'interface'.
This works for cell phones too. The cost to manufacture such a wonderful device (think minerals, etc) far-outweighs the
actual price you pay for one these tools and in most cases, complaints derives from the price of tariffs.
And what is prominently advertised for these mobile telephones...? the camera application! Another utility to possibly
gather peripheral information about a customer that can be sold to businesses for other income.
Yep, the whole game is rigged and may have undercurrents of wanting trans-humanism to occur, but just like the lousy
broadcasts and laughable newspaper articles we often post on this website, the voices of these people who may wish
to change our lives can be weakened if we stop using the conduits they provided in the first place.
Klaus Schwab is a meme deliberately placed in his current position to play on some people's perception that the world
is ran in the manner the writer of the essay describes. He's a retired mechanical engineer, an author (who isn't these days!)
and an economist. His book 'The Fourth Industrial Revolution' is really about using automation to push people out of
employment for the sake of benefiting those who employ.
Not exactly a ground-breaking idea.
However, if one replaces 'people' with the word 'human', an interpretation of his book can be put in the light of trans-humanism,
replacing humans with a knock-off version of a robot. A cyborg. The obfuscation in the essay is where free-will comes into it
and again, another echo appears of how we've been strongly advised to take the anti-sniffles needle and it would be shameful
to follow your own decision-making abilities.
Independent thought isn't radical, it isn't something that demands the wearing of a Che Guevara T-shirt or be seen as a
glitch in the matrix, it's how normal societies behave daily.
The prose races ahead to assume we-as cattle, will just willingly go along with this futuristic dystopian calendar and no other
factors will effect the outcome unless 'we' take action. But life doesn't work like that, just ask the Japanese businesses that were
supposedly taking over the world in the eighties.
And there's the hint.
But the overall warning is worth listening to, I believe some-sort of new gulf is slowly being created by those who have the power
to influence others. I believe it's always been there, but with the category of the fiscally-independent bracket being allowed more
into the 'higher-breeding' authoritative areas of social-control, it's widening at a quicker rate.
'The Great Reset' is a meditative demand to harness -mainly the masses of the G7 countries, in the same manner that worked
for the establishment during the economic recessions of yesteryear, but mainly the 80-83 time. The concerns of money in the
higher halls of order takes second-stage to the control they held over these countries in areas of political-gain and social-authority
during that time.
Many of the young generations perceive an elusive impression of what they call 'freedom' in the model of doing what one wishes
and miss the background of the pragmatic everyday functioning to make a world where one can enjoy such an easy lifestyle.
It's an admiral goal, but requires hard work and some suffering.
If that thought-process can be twisted back in time to where these generations can see the need to put their shoulders to the wheel
instead of mildly discussing the virtues of someone else doing it, a possible paradigm-shift can occur where employment becomes
the ultimate personal-requirement and desperateness can be cultivated.
Even though this sort of social manipulation relied on the family-unit as a driver and now frowned upon, the dangling of employment
in front of someone who sees it as the only way to extinguish hopelessness, is a power well-used by those who seek such influence.
...............................................................
There's nothing wrong at manning the walls to watch for the evil invader, but that doesn't mean every sound from the bushes is
someone with pernicious thoughts on his mind.
(INMHO)
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.