White House

[Ninurta]

@"Ninurta", I was thinking the same thing. I think what the article is focused on is the fact that the leader of the group has not been indicted, while many around him has been. 
They just arrested a 60 yr old woman for walking into the building while the Capitol Police stood there holding the door open for her. There are pictures on Twitter. 

This probably IS a propaganda hit piece on the Oath Keepers, sneaking negative words into the article to influence one's opinion. 

In this article we focus our scrutiny and our suspicion on one individual, Person One, otherwise known as Stewart Rhodes, the leader of the paramilitary Oath Keepers group. 

I think they may be trying to conflate Oath Keepers with more militant groups such as the "III%ers" in the minds of the readers. They also use prejudicial words presented as foregone conclusions in the article, like "antigovernment" and "paramilitary". While Oath Keepers are composed of former military, and former and current law enforcement, sometimes all in the same person, they are not "paramilitary" by any definition I know of.

The word "paramilitary" has been a dirty word since the says of Central American banana republic "revolutions", when anyone who was a "bad guy" was described as being a "paramilitary" or a "right wing death squad" or a "militia member", while their exact mirror images on the Leftist side were described as "guerrillas" or "revolutionaries" or "freedom fighters". taht gave the term "paramilitary" it's current negative coonotation.

In actuality, ALL current US police forces - Federal, State, and Local - are "paramilitaries". They are NOT "military", but are organized, equipped and operated on the same model - right down to wearing the same fatigue uniforms as the established military in many cases -  especially since DHS has gotten in on the act and instituted "fusion Centers" in their effort to militarize local police units.

.