11-05-2020, 08:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-05-2020, 08:28 PM by Mystic Wanderer.)
(11-05-2020, 08:22 PM)BIAD Wrote: Here's some versions of your image, Mystic.
Due to the poor quality -darkness to a digital camera is a bugger to capture,
the important area of the image doesn't yield much.
(left-Right) The first one was only slightly lightened and already you can see
how the camera is attempting to differentiate areas of the blackness and assign
them subtle colour-changes.
Image Two shows what the full extent of what the pixels formed.
Granted, these 'blue-patches' could be something like an interpretation of stars
or clouds that the AI in your camera couldn't fully capture.
Image Three (Bottom Left) is the image at 44% threshold, which means it's
become a basic black/white representation of what was filmed. Any light pixels below
the threshold become black and any above change to white.
(Inset at 33%)
Image Four was where I messed around and sought anything that could be discerned
away from the central light area. I ringed the one place that remained during any
alteration.
Hope this helps.
Thank you @"BIAD" ! That's awesome.
I got the camera for Christmas from my daughter. It was an expensive camera. I'm sure it had a night time setting on it, but I hadn't read the directions yet on how to set it. I was in a hurry and afraid it would leave, so I hurried outside with the auto settings. It didn't catch as much as my phone camera did, as I already said.
I need to read the instructions before another visit.