10-10-2020, 10:31 AM
Nice piece F2d5thCav.
The one thing I find fascinating about the Bigfoot phenomena is how it directly conflicts with the paradigm each one
of us has grown up with. Mainstream science has shown us the route we took to become who we are and nowhere
on that evolutionary path is a large upright biped that continued its existence.
Nowhere... everyone who says they've seen, interacted and even collected physical evidence is either a liar or has
mistakenly observed an everyday animal and added their own desire for it to be this hairy creature. The scientific
community have asked for a carcass and none has been forthcoming. They even refused DNA analysis evidence and
scoffed at the results, even though separate laboratories in Texas and Italy performed the tests.
The rationality for such doubt does make sense if we assume that the empirical research-based bodies are transparent
and holds no political shackles. For a world where Bigfoot is proven to exist, also impacts humans on levels we rarely
contemplate.
Industries, religion, governance, science and social behaviour will be held accountable. Trust in these areas could alter
and that is dangerous. Acknowledgement of such an intelligent simian or crude human would undoubtedly bring about
change in who we are and how we see ourselves on this planet and in the universe.
Everything we know now will have to change.
At this present time we see ourselves as 'top-of-the-tree', we rule this planet as a species and all others are secondary.
Hairy or furry are animalistic traits, un-evolving creatures that haven't the cunning to utilise the materials around them
in any profound manner.
Without wings, one cannot fly and yet humans overcome the natural law of land-confined animals. We protected our
bodies by using materials and constructed buildings to avoid the elements. We controlled the animal kingdom to an
extent that farming is a backbone to our presence here on Earth.
And now you're going to tell us that we were wrong?! You're about to say that there is a cousin of our species living out
there with a guile that has tricked mainstream science and yet behaves in the manner that one step away from the wild
bear or gorilla?
But Bigfoot isn't on our map. We have an academia that conducts itself in such elevated and serious tones that cannot
allow such childish 'boogeymen' stories to have a place in evidence-based research. The mathematics are simple, there's
no such creature identified on the human evolutionary table, then any evidence of hair or flesh samples are not Bigfoot.
End of story.
If such a brute existed, why would it elude us? The majority of animals have behaviours we've come to accept as either
fearful of man and only occasionally interact with us on a opportunistic level or avoid us outright due to their needs not
involving the human species.
In either case, we have the inquisitiveness as sentient beings to observe them and learn more about them.
To put the question to bed of whether Bigfoot exists or not, we've not done this.
...................
The accepted reality is that aliens don't fly around in Ufos and large hairy hominids don't wander the darkness.
The question of whether Bigfoot and aliens are connected in some way is something science would merely chuckle at.
Hairy forest-dwelling beasts having an affinity with a highly technology-driven being that can traverse the vast distances
of space...? It cannot be.
One paradigm is designed on a 'earthy', brusque existence that equates to a world of unevolved tolerance and hardship.
The other is high science, rationality and astute awareness. A doctrine of perspicacious and a confidence of control.
There's an insult there in these explanations being connected, isn't there?!!
Bigfoot does appear quite often in alien encounter lore, even to the point where abductees report that such large beings
wander into the rooms during these experiences. Other accounts tell of medium seances where hairy -often 'smelly' giants,
visit and interact with those seeking knowledge of 'the other side'.
In the sixties and seventies, Bigfoot -or usually just a big hairy creature, was often mentioned being the vicinity of a Ufo
encounter in all parts of the world. Those who are interested in the Ufo phenomena went on to justify such sightings as
there being a connection between both parties, but the truth is we just don't know.
The truth is -in my view, is that we just don't know who we are and what we're really doing here. What's out there is just
what we want to believe... or told to believe.
The one thing I find fascinating about the Bigfoot phenomena is how it directly conflicts with the paradigm each one
of us has grown up with. Mainstream science has shown us the route we took to become who we are and nowhere
on that evolutionary path is a large upright biped that continued its existence.
Nowhere... everyone who says they've seen, interacted and even collected physical evidence is either a liar or has
mistakenly observed an everyday animal and added their own desire for it to be this hairy creature. The scientific
community have asked for a carcass and none has been forthcoming. They even refused DNA analysis evidence and
scoffed at the results, even though separate laboratories in Texas and Italy performed the tests.
The rationality for such doubt does make sense if we assume that the empirical research-based bodies are transparent
and holds no political shackles. For a world where Bigfoot is proven to exist, also impacts humans on levels we rarely
contemplate.
Industries, religion, governance, science and social behaviour will be held accountable. Trust in these areas could alter
and that is dangerous. Acknowledgement of such an intelligent simian or crude human would undoubtedly bring about
change in who we are and how we see ourselves on this planet and in the universe.
Everything we know now will have to change.
At this present time we see ourselves as 'top-of-the-tree', we rule this planet as a species and all others are secondary.
Hairy or furry are animalistic traits, un-evolving creatures that haven't the cunning to utilise the materials around them
in any profound manner.
Without wings, one cannot fly and yet humans overcome the natural law of land-confined animals. We protected our
bodies by using materials and constructed buildings to avoid the elements. We controlled the animal kingdom to an
extent that farming is a backbone to our presence here on Earth.
And now you're going to tell us that we were wrong?! You're about to say that there is a cousin of our species living out
there with a guile that has tricked mainstream science and yet behaves in the manner that one step away from the wild
bear or gorilla?
But Bigfoot isn't on our map. We have an academia that conducts itself in such elevated and serious tones that cannot
allow such childish 'boogeymen' stories to have a place in evidence-based research. The mathematics are simple, there's
no such creature identified on the human evolutionary table, then any evidence of hair or flesh samples are not Bigfoot.
End of story.
If such a brute existed, why would it elude us? The majority of animals have behaviours we've come to accept as either
fearful of man and only occasionally interact with us on a opportunistic level or avoid us outright due to their needs not
involving the human species.
In either case, we have the inquisitiveness as sentient beings to observe them and learn more about them.
To put the question to bed of whether Bigfoot exists or not, we've not done this.
...................
The accepted reality is that aliens don't fly around in Ufos and large hairy hominids don't wander the darkness.
The question of whether Bigfoot and aliens are connected in some way is something science would merely chuckle at.
Hairy forest-dwelling beasts having an affinity with a highly technology-driven being that can traverse the vast distances
of space...? It cannot be.
One paradigm is designed on a 'earthy', brusque existence that equates to a world of unevolved tolerance and hardship.
The other is high science, rationality and astute awareness. A doctrine of perspicacious and a confidence of control.
There's an insult there in these explanations being connected, isn't there?!!
Bigfoot does appear quite often in alien encounter lore, even to the point where abductees report that such large beings
wander into the rooms during these experiences. Other accounts tell of medium seances where hairy -often 'smelly' giants,
visit and interact with those seeking knowledge of 'the other side'.
In the sixties and seventies, Bigfoot -or usually just a big hairy creature, was often mentioned being the vicinity of a Ufo
encounter in all parts of the world. Those who are interested in the Ufo phenomena went on to justify such sightings as
there being a connection between both parties, but the truth is we just don't know.
The truth is -in my view, is that we just don't know who we are and what we're really doing here. What's out there is just
what we want to believe... or told to believe.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.