Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mark and Patricia McCloskey
#29
(06-29-2020, 07:09 PM)Ninurta Wrote: [Image: 5ef954f727755.image_.jpg?itok=qzx4A0rs]

Yeah, it's either a .32 or a .38, probably a .32, and it'll put the hurt on a protester if she can hit 'em. Even a .22 will work, 'cause no one WANTS to be shot! - and .22s have been the choice of professional assassins for decades. They're quieter and get the job done, you just have to pump 3 - 5 rounds into the target in a rapid succession.

All of the defensive shootings I've seen video of lately have the crowd dispersing and unassing the AO in a hell of a hurry as soon as caps start getting busted, but you can't count on it because some of the core cadre for Antifa have combat training and experience with the Marxist PKK terrorists. And as someone else observed, they are increasingly becoming armed. So, if you have to shoot, don't shoot to scare or tickle 'em, shoot to render them inoperative. VERY inoperative.

And, as someone else also observed, you won't get any more time for 50 than you will for one, so the more the merrier.

The article says they got in a "shouting match" with the rioters. Yes, rioters - if they're trespassing on private property and have destroyed a gate, it's no longer a protest. Shouting matches are stupid and non-productive. Loud bangs carry a message farther. I'd pump one - that's ONE - round into the ground at their feet, and then if they keep coming, light them up. 

Words are not necessary. Actions speak louder than words.

And people wonder why I have 40 round mags for my AR and 32 round mags for my sidearm... When a crowd is rushing you, it's a pain in the ass to have to change magazines.

That gateway was an excellent choke point - why were the rioters allowed to get past it where they could spread out? This could all have been prevented by one round into the ground at the gate while they were assailing the gate and destroying it.

See how they run...

.

that's much better picture than i was looking at, and yes it's got to be a .32,or.380.

as far as being rushed, yes it can happen. in the videos i've and read about, once the bullet start flying they bug out. have yet to see one where the antifa's have disarmed anyone. not saying it hasn't happened, but i have yet to see one. hell in the new mexico incident, there were four or five of them swarming him hitting him with a skate board, yelling i'm gonna kill you, but once he popped a cap in one it was run run run, you shot him you shot. the the guy that fired sat the gun down ground and then he sat down. no attacked any more.

then the guy in seattle shot the fella who tried to pull him out of his car was surrounded by hundreds, some thought they would be sneaky and come from behind, but when he turned and they saw the gun backed off. then he ran through the crowd and no one stopped him.

but there is always there is always the chance they want.


Messages In This Thread
Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-29-2020, 11:52 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by F2d5thCav - 06-29-2020, 11:55 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Snarl - 06-29-2020, 02:30 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by wessonoil - 06-30-2020, 01:35 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-29-2020, 03:05 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-29-2020, 10:41 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-30-2020, 09:49 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Ninurta - 06-29-2020, 07:09 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Lumenari - 06-29-2020, 10:49 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Snarl - 06-29-2020, 11:33 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Ninurta - 06-30-2020, 01:07 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Snarl - 06-30-2020, 02:04 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Ninurta - 06-30-2020, 04:37 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by hounddoghowlie - 06-30-2020, 01:20 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Wallfire - 06-30-2020, 10:14 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-30-2020, 10:46 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Ninurta - 06-30-2020, 11:23 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by F2d5thCav - 06-29-2020, 02:10 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by BIAD - 06-29-2020, 02:14 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Schmoe1 - 06-29-2020, 05:46 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by BIAD - 06-29-2020, 02:14 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-29-2020, 03:07 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-29-2020, 03:04 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by beez - 06-29-2020, 03:08 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Snarl - 06-29-2020, 05:16 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Bally002 - 06-29-2020, 11:28 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-29-2020, 11:11 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Ninurta - 06-30-2020, 12:24 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-30-2020, 09:37 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Ninurta - 06-30-2020, 11:28 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-30-2020, 03:27 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by kdog - 06-29-2020, 11:48 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by kdog - 06-30-2020, 01:41 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Anathros - 06-30-2020, 04:50 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-30-2020, 10:03 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-30-2020, 09:24 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by BIAD - 06-30-2020, 12:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)