(07-24-2021, 06:20 AM)Kenzo Wrote: Yeehand it seems there is quite a few trials still going on in UK , and in fact many countries.....
covid vaccinen tracker
Are those vaccines in UK FULLY AUTHORIZED or have they only emergency approval ?
I thought pretty much all major corona vaccines are still in trial phase...
When going down one of these 'rabbit-holes', an average person would presume that information gathered from official
websites and organisations would be to the highest standard and factually correct in all aspects of a particular subject.
Below may seem obvious to many, but it warrants reading to remind us that words can be used for good intentions as
well as bad. A message can be transmitted that may seem official by using Government-approved links, but the content
of what is written separate from the links is the important factor.
In the Covid-19 situation, there are some drawbacks. To start with, it's a mutating virus and the individuals it can effect have
independent situations, this means that blanket statements may not be fully helpful or precise.
Also the logistics of information-sharing as to be taken into account. A website may have inaccurate advice or facts due
to the lack of diligence of the person or groups that update such sites.
There are also laws that need to be adhered to that may hinder a particular message one wishes to convey for the benefit
of a reader/user/viewer. Private health information must not be displayed unless consent from the individual involved is given.
However, a health-worker who is caring for a patient can offer condoned information regarding that patient and even though
this may be seen as a 'point of view' or opinion, it is within the UK's National Health Service (NHS) guidelines on rendering
official information without breaching the duty of confidentiality.
But it must be shown that the patient's personal data remains anonymous at all times.
...................................................
Then there's the political influence on such information. If one steers clear of 'conspiratorial'-styled belief structures that the
mainstream media tend to frown upon, one is still in the zone where the wrong type of guidance can be given due to slanted
wordage from accepted media outlets.
What is rarely shown in the daily bombardment of ratings-hungry articles, is the permission requested from individuals involved
in a reported incident. Whether when using visuals or audio statements, the true ethical standard would be to seek such approval
and the right to edit for viewer/readership convenience.
This standard has been severely ignored recently in the Press and in the case of the Covid pandemic.
Also, many official Government-approved websites -especially about the Covid virus, contain information offered under a
heading formed in a question. This is a type of control is used to corral a reader towards a certain point and ensures only
a 'positive' leaning to a preferred channelled message.
...................................................
Now back to your question!
There are many types of review committees for many topics surrounding the current SARS/Covid vaccine trials in the UK.
Today's governance just loves bureaucracy, it's where accountability can go grey!
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
The Health Research Authority (HRA)
The independent Commission on Human Medicines (CHM)
Research Ethics Service (RES)
The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI)
These groups -supposedly independent of political interference and persuasion, review the safety, quality, and effectiveness data
of any type of drug offered from the pharmaceutical industry. If an agreed standard is met, then clinical tests and trials can be sought
with the assistance of volunteers.
One of the current ways of pushing the much-needed information about this bat-flu is to fast-track it, a manner that can say a lot about
the sender of the information and the receiver.
But to be fully authorised means that normally, long-term trials need to be undertaken and since Covid-19 is accepted as a new virus,
such extensive research hasn't been performed. Again, this is where politics steps in to 'translate' initial findings for a vaccine into
suggestive and cogent use of phrasing.
Basically speaking, you're on the outside of a many-layered sphere where 'fully authorised' means nothing in the usual form of our
belief in something because those in authority are assumed to have our best interests at-heart.
If you follow the narrative of a world-damaging virus that moves by breathing it in or touching it daily, those in power know what they
know because they believe those who pass along information from people who are paid to work in this particular field of science.
The doubt on all this comes from the poor parlance and diction in Journalism. In general, a scientist doesn't tell you what he/she
concludes from their various forecasts, modelling and resulting data, somebody working for a media business does!
Quote:The vaccine passports are not about virus or even vaccines IMO....but New World Order dystopian 1984 control mechanism
for the useless eaters, common people need permission to cross the street....new normal , and sometime in future breathing
needs some kind of permission or maybe tax it lol .
The one thing that startles me about all of this is the basic manner that Governments and Health services laid out the scheme
and then lost control of the incoming results due to the lack of specific understanding of human-beings.
For instance:
There's a tendency for those who lived in the sixties and seventies to appreciate the music of those times more than today's
music. This has been with us from time immemorial, generations differ in how their current world paradigm can seem unusual
from the world they developed in.
Today, it's assumed everyone has a smart-phone and/or internet access and worringly, governmental control-mechanisms to
oversee the public during the Covid pandemic tends to be based on the idea everyone is connected to the world-wide-web!
Is the virus too?!!
Quote:How to access the NHS COVID PassNHS Source:
Access the NHS COVID Pass through the NHS App
You can access your NHS COVID Pass through the free NHS App on a mobile device such as a smartphone or tablet.
Proof of your COVID-19 status will be shown within the NHS App.
We recommend that you register with the app before booking international travel.
For access via the NHS App you do not need to contact your GP.
The NHS App is not the same as the NHS COVID-19 app.
In the NHS App, your COVID-19 status includes a 2D barcode.
The expiry date does not apply to your vaccination status.
Any expiry date refers only to the barcode and will update automatically each time you go into the NHS App.
The best anyone could say is the actual monitoring-part -the impression that 'somebody' is making sure a person is doing
what is assumed to be the correct thing for the good of the whole, has been taken out of the hands of the individual and is
currently being relayed back into the public's consciousness in a poor manner.
Some may believe that Covid-19 vaccines teaches our immune systems recognise the SARS-cOv-2 and others may believe
that such an inoculation against a constantly mutating virus is a waste of time. But all I personally know is that people I've never
met are constantly telling me to have something I wasn't involved in, to be inserted into my body.
And they all work for a news-outlet.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.