(05-15-2021, 07:20 AM)drussell41 Wrote: Allow me to guess: they're lying, magnets do not stick to skin, there's nothing to worry about/see here, and no, we shouldn't remotely investigate to see if there's something to it.
I would certainly agree that an investigation should be done in this alarming instance. If there is something metallic under the
skin directly where an injection was performed, any 'pro-vaccine' advocate and those in doubt, should look into it.
(I'm actually surprised that there's a Wikipedia page on the subject of 'Magnets Under The Skin'!)
Of course, when this 'metal-under-the-skin' claim is sought via a Fact-Check website, one will discover this claim:
Quote:There are no microchips in the Covid-19 vaccinesFullFact.org:
'One of the most widely-shared clips ends with someone who claims to have had a dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech
vaccine telling viewers: “We’re chipped.”
Claims that the vaccines contain a microchip have persisted throughout the pandemic, with baseless claims that
vaccines will be used to harvest personal data shared repeatedly. Full Fact has covered similar claims in the past.
The Covid-19 vaccines currently in use in the UK do not contain microchips, or any device that could track a person’s
movements.
All of the the ingredients for the Pfizer/BioNTech, Oxford/AstraZeneca and Moderna vaccines have been made publicly
available. None of them contain enough of anything that would attract a magnet, and certainly no microchips or tracking
devices...'
The slippery part is that not everyone who has taken the jab lives in the UK!
I don't believe it's merely body-sweat or natural grease that causes the magnets to adhere to the skin.
It would be rational to to think that if an agency wished to insert a tracking device or Data-collecting chip into the public,
would that public willingly go along with the request? No... of course not. So how would go one about succeeding in this wish?
Just like the FBI trawling through the public's personal mail or illegal bugging of the Democratic National Committee
headquarters at the Washington, D.C, you'd keep it secret and if asked, you'd deny it.
The public have a tendency to equate positions in power to some-sort of high moral standing. Ask yourself this, if the standard
behaviour of a working person is to retire at sixty-six in the US, why is Nancy Pelosi still in her job at eighty-one years of age?!
Is it because she cares so much for the people of her State and country?
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.