01-18-2021, 01:52 PM
(01-13-2021, 12:57 PM)BIAD Wrote: I found it odd that the sexuality of the three men who were sitting in the park on a summer's weekday was always kept under wraps by the MSM in many of the articles of the attack. Why would that be? Three single men -and others, enjoying a sit-down in a park on a warm day.I don't have a problem with homos ... Don't have a problem with Islamer-Bombers (except the one guy who claimed me as his friend) ... as long as they abstain from involving me in their proclivities (entirely) or leave me alone (completely).
It is amusing to see how the MSM tries to skirt dealing with the conflicts that 'had to happen'. The homos were the media darlings for so long. Then the made-up boogeyman called AIDS. Then a MASSIVE influx of radical refugees. Leaves one scratching their head.
I'm becoming a fan of Social Distancing. I'd favor a policy of 7 yards. If anyone gets within that radius I should have a right to shoot them without question. In the case above, the Islamer-Bomber probably wanted that distance to be extended to visual range. Those three fellas had a right to life. That misguided SOB murdered them. Is locking him away for life enough? Would a life-for-a-life (he killed three) be enough?
Again, who thought messing with geographical fencing was ever a good idea?
'Cause if they catch you in the back seat trying to pick her locks
They're gonna send you back to Mother in a cardboard box
You better run!