'Global Warming' 'Climate Change' getting Rebranding?

[BIAD]

Its no longer called "soylent green", its called "raciest white man climate change denier"

Ah yes, but only by those who don't fall under that heading or have been indoctrinated into believing
that the evil white devil is the one who's deliberately created all of this for foul ends!

F*ck the promotion of civilisation and f*ck the comfort it's created to bitch about their climate-change
beliefs, they're now in the mode of blaming and for them, that's enough.
Here's an example of their doctrine.

Climate change: COP25 talks open as 'point of no return' in sight.


Strong, powerful women.

'Political leaders and climate diplomats are meeting in Madrid for two weeks of talks amid a growing sense
of crisis. According to UN Secretary General António Guterres, "the point of no return is no longer over the
horizon".

Meanwhile, Save the Children says that climate shocks have left millions in Africa facing hunger.
The charity says 33 million people are at emergency levels of food insecurity due to cyclones and droughts.
This conference of the parties, or COP25, was due to be held in Chile but was cancelled by the government
due to weeks of civil disturbances...'

Civil disturbances... you mean the supposed green-loving Chileans were bitching about subway-fare increases.
Hardly a climate-loving form of transport! But I suppose we should look at the bigger picture.

'...Spain then stepped in to host the event, which will see 29,000 attendees over the two weeks of talks.
Speaking ahead of the meeting the UN secretary general said the climate crisis was imminent and political leaders
had to respond.

"In the crucial 12 months ahead, it is essential that we secure more ambitious national commitments - particularly from 
he main emitters - to immediately start reducing greenhouse gas emissions at a pace consistent to reaching carbon
neutrality by 2050.

"We simply have to stop digging and drilling and take advantage of the vast possibilities offered by renewable energy
and nature-based solutions," Mr Guterres said. Almost every country in the world has now signed and ratified the Paris
climate agreement and under the terms of the pact they will all have to put new climate pledges on the table before the
end of 2020...'

This about the Obama-driven act of opening up new oil supplies in the US and the United States now being an oil-exporting
country for the first time. It's about money and the repercussions of America not funding the proposals of the UN Climate
Change Conference.
Trump said go f*ck yer'self!

Countdown to Glasgow
This meeting in Madrid signals the start of a frantic 12 months of negotiations that will culminate in Glasgow with COP26 in
November next year. Some 50 world leaders are expected to attend the meeting in the Spanish capital - but US President
Donald Trump will not be among them.

However Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi will attend the conference with a congressional delegation...'

Oh yeah, Pelosi likes to travel. The notion of pollution is a problem when you're talking about the world -in Pelosi's eyes, but
as long as you don't talk a certain part of that polluted world. Namely the State she represents.

'...While her presence has been welcomed, US environmentalists want to see concrete steps on climate.
"While it's great Speaker Pelosi is coming to Madrid in place of Trump, symbolic gestures are no substitute for bold action,"
said Jean Su, from the US Center for Biological Diversity...'

She'll blame Trump and suggest the UN should impeach him! It's all she knows.

"America remains the number one historic contributor to the climate emergency, and even Democratic politicians have never
committed to taking responsibility for our fair share." Underlining the real world impacts of climate change, a report from the
charity Save the Children, says that what it calls "climate shocks" are threatening tens of millions of people in East and Southern
Africa...'

BBC:

Yep, America pays and here we are in the same position after Trump stops the amount of funding. A self-perpetuating money
machine that needs more and more from those who it's been decided has the most of it.
..................................................

But let's reinforce that mind-set, let's show the 'good-guys' and the evil ones.
First up, the chaps who're tightening their pollution belts and working towards a better world.

Climate Emergency CoP 25: India is the only major economy to be ‘2 degree compatible’



The US, China and the EU are ‘highly insufficient’ in their efforts to reduce GHG emissions.



'China, India, the EU and the US accounted for almost 60 per cent of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil fuel combustion
in 2017. The world will be on track to meet its targets under the Paris Agreement only if these countries / group of countries meet
their respective targets. 

But it is not the case as the lack of progress on overall mitigation is matched by lack of progress in delivering on equity.
Per capita emissions continue to be allocated highly unequally — in 2017, per capita emissions in the US were nearly nine times
as high as India's. Let’s look at how each of these countries is performing on their respective targets as per their Nationally
Determined Contributions (NDCs)...'

Aaah, so it IS the US that's the baddie and quickly forgetting the first paragraph, they seem to be the main polluter of the world.
I see now. Wait though, it seems the yellow-man may be just as guilty as the white one and in India's particular case, it just wishes to 
discuss what they're on track of supposedly doing, not what they've done.
I get it now and by the way, I didn't miss that 'Inequity graph' and what it implied!

'...China’s actions have been deemed ‘Highly Insufficient’ by the Climate Action Tracker, an initiative by two German non-profits,
to assess climate mitigation commitments. A ‘Highly Insufficient’ rating implies that if all countries took mitigation actions like China's,
global mean temperatures would rise by 3-4°C by the end of the century.

India
India’s headline pledge under its NDC is to reduce the emission intensity of its GDP (greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions per unit
GDP) by 33-35 per cent over 2005 levels by 2030, and the 2019 Emissions Gap Report notes that the country is on track to exceed
it by 15 per cent.

In addition, India has committed to generate 40 per cent of its installed power capacity from non-fossil sources by 2030, with an interim
target of 175 GW of non-hydro renewables by 2022. While India is on track to meet the 2030 target, it may fall short of the interim target
by as much as 42 per cent, warns a 2019 report by CRISIL, a Mumbai-based global analytics firm...'

See...? They're trying to show you that India is committed to being one of the good guys, you just don't understand how difficult it is.

'...Going beyond the emphasis on targets, Sujatha Byravan, a Chennai-based scientist, argues that instead of deepening democracy
through community-level generation, renewable projects are being awarded to big players, and an opportunity to transform the power
sector was being lost...'

Who's to blame there? Old whitey, I guess.

'...India has also pledged an additional carbon sink equivalent to 2.5-3 billion tonnes of CO2 by 2030 through forest and tree cover.
But the Union government’s Green India Mission, which seeks to achieve the same, has been regularly missing its annual targets,
and rendering the fulfilment of the pledge unlikely.

Overall, the Climate Action Tracker has rated the country’s efforts as ‘2 degree compatible’, which means that if all countries made
efforts like India’s, the average global temperature rise could be limited to 2°C by 2100. India is the world's only major economy
to be rated so...'

DownToEarth. Org:

Well, you're given a pass and maybe that $1.8 billion India spends on its space program could help?
.........................................

Maybe we should look to somewhere else for neutral news on what lil' Greta Thunberg keeps getting upset about?
Gulf News.

Who are the world's biggest polluters?
According to data from the Global Carbon Project.

1: China is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide in the world, according to the most recent data
from the Global Carbon Project. China emits about 10,357 million metric tons per year.

2: The United States is second, with about 5,414 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year.

3: India emits about 2,274 million metric tons per year.

4:The Russian Federation emits about 1,617 million metric tons per year.
.
5: Japan emits about 1,237 million metric tons per year.

6: Germany emits about 798 million metric tons per year.

7: Iran emits about 648 million metric tons per year.

8: Saudi Arabia emits about 601 million metric tons per year.

9: South Korea emits about 592 million metric tons per year.

10: Canada emits about 557 million metric tons per year.

(Image below is 1-10 = left-to-right)

You take the skin-colour-guilt out of the equation and you see that countries never mentioned by the MSM are part of the problem too.
Climate change in a first-world paradigm is about social control through their uses of race and wealth guilt. The Earth isn't their concern,
the need to control is.