Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Will The Democratic Party Exist After 2020 Election?
#1
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/will...0-election
Quote:Will The Democratic Party Exist After 2020 Election?


[Image: picture-5.jpg?itok=LY4e264-]
by Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/21/2019 - 23:05

0
SHARES
   

Authored by Renee Parsons via Off-Guardian.org,
Even before Rep. Tulsi Gabbard threatened to boycott the October 15th Dem debate as the DNC usurps the role of voters in the Democratic primacy 2020 election and with an impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump on the table, the Swamp was stirred and its slimy muck may be about to come to the surface as never before.
If so, those revelations are long overdue.
It is no secret to the observant that since the 2016 election, the Democratic Party has been in a state of near-collapse, the victim of its own hubris, having lost their moral compass with unsubstantiated Russisgate allegations; those accusations continue as a futile exercise of domestic regime change.

[Image: Democratic-Debate-4th-Ohio-2000x900.jpg]
Today’s Dems are less than a bona fide opposition party offering zero policy solutions, unrecognizable from past glories and not the same political party many of us signed up for many years ago. Instead, the American public is witnessing a frenzied, unscrupulous strategy.
Desperate in the denial of its demise, confronting its own shadow of corruption as the Dems have morphed into a branch of the CIA – not unlike origins of the East German Stasi government.
It should not be necessary to say but in today’s hyper volatile political climate it is: No American should be labelled as anything other than a loyal American to be deeply disturbed by the Democrat/CIA collusion that is currently operating an unprecedented Kangaroo Court in secret, behind closed doors; thus posing an ominous provocation to what remains of our Constitutional Republic.
As any politically savvy, independent thinking American might grasp, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and their entire coterie of sycophants always knew that Russiagate was a crock of lies.
They lied to their willing Democratic rank n file, they lied to American public and they continue to lie about their bogus Impeachment campaign.
It may be that whistleblower Ed Snowden’s revelations about the NSA surveillance state was the first inkling for many Americans that there is a Big Problem with an out-of-control intelligence community until Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer warned that Trump was being ‘really dumb” in daring to question Intel’s faulty conclusion that Russia hacked the 2016 election.
Quote:“Let me tell you. You take on the intelligence community = they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”
Inescapably, Schumer was suggesting  that the Congress has no oversight, that there is no accountability and that the US has lost its democratic roots when a newly elected President does not have the authority to question or publicly disagree with any of the Intel agencies.
Since the 2016 election, there has been a steady drumbeat of the US Intel’s unabashed efforts to undermine and otherwise prevent a newly elected President from governing – which sounds like a clear case of insubordination or some might call it treasonous.
The Intel antipathy does not appear to be rooted in cuts to a favorite social services program but rather protecting a power, financial and influence agenda that goes far deeper and more profound than most Americans care to contemplate.
Among a plethora of egregious corporate media reactions, no doubt stirred by their Intel masters, was to a July, 2018 summit meeting between Russian President Putin and Trump in Helsinki emblematic of illegitimate censures from Intel veterans and its cronies: 
Quote:Trump sides with Putin over US Intelligence” – CNN
Did Trump Commit Treason at Putin Meeting?” – Newsweek, and
Trump Slammed Over Disgrace, Disgusting Press Conference with Putin – Newsweek.
Not one praised Trump for pursuing peace with Russia.
And yet, fellow Americans, it is curious to consider that there was no outrage after the 911 attacks in 2001 from any member of Congress, President Bush or the Corporate Media that the US intelligence community had utterly failed in its mission to keep the American public safe.
There was no reckoning, not one person in authority was held accountable, not one person who had the responsibility to ‘know’ was fired from any of the Intel agencies. Why is that?
As a result of  the corrupt foundation of the Russiagate allegations, Attorney General Bob Barr and Special Investigator John Durham appear hot on the trail with law enforcement in Italy as they have apparently scared the bejesus out of what little common sense remains among the Democratic hierarchy as if Barr/Durham might be headed for Obama’s Oval Office.
Barr’s earlier comment before the Senate that “spying did occur’ and that ‘it’s a big deal’ when an incumbent administration (ie the Obama Administration) authorizes a counter-Intelligence operation on an opposing candidate (ie Donald Trump) has the Dems in panic-stricken overdrive – and that is what is driving the current Impeachment Inquiry.
With the stark realization that none of the DNC’s favored top tier candidates has the mojo to go the distance, the Democrats have now focused on a July 25th phone call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in which Trump allegedly ‘pressured’ Zelenskyy to investigate Joe Biden’s relationship with Burisma, the country’s largest natural gas provider.
At issue is any hanky panky involving Burisma payments to Rosemont Seneca Partners, an equity firm owned by Joe’s errant son, Hunter, who served on Burisma’s Board for a modest $50,000 a month.
Zelenskyy, who defeated the US-endorsed incumbent President Petro Poroshenko in a landslide victory, speaks Russian, was elected to clean up corruption and end the conflict in eastern Ukraine.  The war in the Donbass began as a result of the US State Department’s role in the overthrow of democratically elected Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych in 2014.
Trump’s first priority on July 25th was Crowd Strike, a cybersecurity firm with links to the HRC campaign which was hired by the DNC to investigate Russian hacking of its server. 
The Dems have reason to be concerned since it is worth contemplating why the FBI did not legally mandate that the DNC turn its server over to them for an official Federal forensic inspection. 
One can only speculate…those chickens may be coming home to roost.
Days after an anonymous whistleblower (not to be confused with a real whistleblower like Edward Snowden) later identified as a CIA analyst with a professional history linked to Joe Biden, publicly released a Complaint against Trump. 
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced the initiation of an ambiguous Impeachment Inquiry campaign with little specificity about the process.  The Complaint is suspect since it reads more like a professionally prepared Affidavit and the Dems consider Pelosi’s statement as sufficient to initiate a formal process that fails to follow the time-honored path of a full House vote predicating a legitimate impeachment inquiry on to the Judiciary Committee.
Of special interest is how the process to date is playing out with the House Intelligence Committee in a key role conducting what amounts to clandestine meetings, taking depositions and witness statements behind closed doors with a still secret unidentified whistleblower’s identity and voice obscured from Republican members of the Intel Committee and a witness testifying without being formally sworn in – all too eerily similar to East Germany.
The pretense of shielding the thinly veiled CIA operative as a whistleblower from public exposure can only be seen as an overly-dramatic transparent performance as the Dems have never exhibited any concern about protecting real whistleblowers like Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Bill Binney, Thomas Drake, John Kiriakou, Julian Assange, Jeffrey Sterling and others who were left to fend for themselves as the Obama Administration prosecuted more true, authentic whistleblowers than any other administration since the Espionage Act of 1917.
As the paradigm shift takes its toll on the prevailing framework of reality and our decayed political institutions, (the FBI and DOJ come to mind as the Inspector General’s report is due at  week’s end), how much longer does the Democratic Party, which no longer serves a useful public purpose, deserve to exist?
IMO yes they will still exist by name but the democratic party I grew up with died several years ago and turned into the socialist party..
Reply
#2
I'm mulling on a couple of 'nowism' questions at the moment.

If this was an official investigation, then why would this 'whistle-blower' need to be kept anonymous?
I would assume that this 'thinly veiled CIA operative'  working in the White House is known as a 'thinly
veiled CIA operative' by those who work alongside him or her!

Then, with guaranteed certainty that this operative is working within the Government's strict ruling that
no CIA employee can operate in 'spy-mode' within the United States, work-colleagues can feel a little
safer that they're not being monitored by an external agency.

Because if not, the Democratic Party are pompously demanding the human listening-device should remain
in the President's residence. And that's the Stasi way.
..............................

In the supposed air of transparency and political maturity, there's a behind-closed-doors Hearing about
what a President said to another leader of a country. Disregarding the transcript of that telephone call,
wasn't the Burisma Holdings investigation part of a wider US investigation from 2016 in regards of the
of the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 United States election?

Would it not be appropriate to ask how a Ukraine-led investigation of those from the Burisma company
was going? After all, a former US Vice-President and leading politician's son was working for the firm
and whether there's a lead there or not, it could smear Hunter Biden's career if he has no connection
with the never-ceasing corruption within that particular business.
...........................

No, it's just play-acting for the audience. Donald Trump is bad and the establishment politicians, the
paid-for corrupt media and assumed-naive activists that grace the television screens every evening
will accept that a majority of the sleeping public have woken up.

As said by ZeroHedge, the Democrats have nothing to offer that public except the rules that they are
subservient to their betters. Namely, Pelosi and the stuff she has on her shoe... stuff called Schumer.
It must be difficult to accept that something as true as breathing air, is now being challenged to these
embedded thieves.

They make their fortunes by creating laws that benefit business and the bank transfers are never queried.
They live lifestyles far-removed from those they're alleged to represent and the media never cast negatives
towards them. They have those doubt their behavior politically eradicated and ruined and sometimes worse.

In a real world, a genuine media would be using all their ties to discover the name of this person who did
a 'REO Speedwagon' on the phone call. But in a real world, a genuine media wouldn't call official press-releases
'leaks' and only ask inane questions of political figures in order to prop up their dying trade.

The reality that many of us live in is fake... and it took a former Game-show celebrity and wealthy New York
property-shark to tell us so.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#3
It seems that the Left is pushing hard in Europe and the USA to destroy any democratic system. Seems strange that the left is using very powerfully muslims to do this
WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH, THE EU IS FATHER AND MOTHER
Reply
#4
(10-22-2019, 12:12 PM)Wallfire Wrote: It seems that the Left is pushing hard in Europe and the USA to destroy any democratic system. Seems strange that the left is using very powerfully muslims to do this

Well they use African-Americans, people of particular sexual persuasions, the undeveloped youth and even UFO enthusiasts,
so it's only fair to use Muslims too!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#5
"The World is a Stage" just took on a more real meaning. I see everything as being a staged event in politics now. Everyone has their lines to say, hoping to get an emotional response from the masses they wish to control. It's up to us to wake up those sleeping in delusional slumber.

ACT 2 is coming up...

Stay tuned.
Reply
#6
(10-22-2019, 10:04 AM)BIAD Wrote: In a real world, a genuine media would be using all their ties to discover the name of this person who did
a 'REO Speedwagon' on the phone call. But in a real world, a genuine media wouldn't call official press-releases
'leaks' and only ask inane questions of political figures in order to prop up their dying trade.

"I heard it from a friend who
heard it from a friend who
heard it from another
That you been messin' around..."

Quote:The reality that many of us live in is fake... and it took a former Game-show celebrity and wealthy New York
property-shark to tell us so.

He pointed out that the Emperor is naked. For that, he must be punished...

.
" I don't mind killin' a man in a fair fight... or if I think he's gonna start a fair fight... or if there's money involved... or a woman... "

 - Jayne Cobb, Hero of Canton
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)