It's one of those Gordian Knots that is preferred by the status quo to remain untied. With identity-politics running rampant
at the moment, I can see how another participant on the the stage would just bring more problems to the already-burdened
establishment!
All the offered samples from the public will be determined to be regular animals of forested and mountainous regions. It has
to be this way until the same powers-that-be allow such an acknowledgement of a human-like 'cousin' to be accepted into
the mainstream.
When that happens, everything will change.
Even if we go along with the theory that Bigfoot is basically just an animal that happens to walks on two legs, possesses fair
thinking-abilities and has a nearness to human communities, this will pose a dilemma of what to do with it.
If we ignore it -as we do now, then is there an incident in the future where Sasquatch's existence becomes undeniable and
questions will be asked on trust regarding Government agencies and the media?
Why was Sasquatch's existence ignored and ridiculed?
If Bigfoot's existence was known, what else are you hiding...? How many members of the public have been killed, taken and
what is the level of deception? What levels of scientific academia are knowingly involved, was the standard model of the
human evolution tree deliberately altered to hide this biped's existence and if so, why?
What impact does this have on religion?
Sasquatch walks like a man, he resembles man and may even hold certain moralistic attitudes in the similar vein of humanity.
If God made man in his own image, who's top in the ranking now...? Are we still the correct form that the deity favoured?
Did Noah wave a couple of these large hairy brutes onto his ark and just forgot to register them in his book...?
In fact, how far back does this assumed ignorant or deliberate manipulation of history go?
Where do we go from here?
What rights will this 'Almost-Man' be entitled to? If we accept the creature's reluctance to interact with modern man is part of its
social make-up, do we then cordon off parts of countries so that their natural existence isn't harmed by our deliberate input?
Are we then not caging them in a manner not really any different from animals we currently keep in a zoo or Native Americans
on reservations?
How will accountability work with these beings?
How do we determine justice when it comes to Bigfoot? If this powerful animal negatively reacts to accidental trespass or overt
scientific study and death or injuries occur, will it be deemed that a type of euthanasia be the verdict for the creature or will it be
merely destroyed without any concerns that Bigfoot can hold possible basic ethics of altruism?
What if Sasquatch has a belief-structure that abrades with our generally accepted ways of living?
Can Bigfoot be racist, homophobic, bigoted or even religiously radical? If we forgive their unsophisticated demeanour in the hope
it convinces us we're still superior, are we not again, relegating to the Bigfoot to the status of animal?
If not, do we change our ways of looking at ourselves and realign our values to cater for our new member of mankind?
No. Bigfoot must remain a myth, then a mythical animal and then some day -with intense conviction from the establishment,
a living animal only. For now, it's better to ignore it until the next guy takes the job.
at the moment, I can see how another participant on the the stage would just bring more problems to the already-burdened
establishment!
All the offered samples from the public will be determined to be regular animals of forested and mountainous regions. It has
to be this way until the same powers-that-be allow such an acknowledgement of a human-like 'cousin' to be accepted into
the mainstream.
When that happens, everything will change.
Even if we go along with the theory that Bigfoot is basically just an animal that happens to walks on two legs, possesses fair
thinking-abilities and has a nearness to human communities, this will pose a dilemma of what to do with it.
If we ignore it -as we do now, then is there an incident in the future where Sasquatch's existence becomes undeniable and
questions will be asked on trust regarding Government agencies and the media?
Why was Sasquatch's existence ignored and ridiculed?
If Bigfoot's existence was known, what else are you hiding...? How many members of the public have been killed, taken and
what is the level of deception? What levels of scientific academia are knowingly involved, was the standard model of the
human evolution tree deliberately altered to hide this biped's existence and if so, why?
What impact does this have on religion?
Sasquatch walks like a man, he resembles man and may even hold certain moralistic attitudes in the similar vein of humanity.
If God made man in his own image, who's top in the ranking now...? Are we still the correct form that the deity favoured?
Did Noah wave a couple of these large hairy brutes onto his ark and just forgot to register them in his book...?
In fact, how far back does this assumed ignorant or deliberate manipulation of history go?
Where do we go from here?
What rights will this 'Almost-Man' be entitled to? If we accept the creature's reluctance to interact with modern man is part of its
social make-up, do we then cordon off parts of countries so that their natural existence isn't harmed by our deliberate input?
Are we then not caging them in a manner not really any different from animals we currently keep in a zoo or Native Americans
on reservations?
How will accountability work with these beings?
How do we determine justice when it comes to Bigfoot? If this powerful animal negatively reacts to accidental trespass or overt
scientific study and death or injuries occur, will it be deemed that a type of euthanasia be the verdict for the creature or will it be
merely destroyed without any concerns that Bigfoot can hold possible basic ethics of altruism?
What if Sasquatch has a belief-structure that abrades with our generally accepted ways of living?
Can Bigfoot be racist, homophobic, bigoted or even religiously radical? If we forgive their unsophisticated demeanour in the hope
it convinces us we're still superior, are we not again, relegating to the Bigfoot to the status of animal?
If not, do we change our ways of looking at ourselves and realign our values to cater for our new member of mankind?
No. Bigfoot must remain a myth, then a mythical animal and then some day -with intense conviction from the establishment,
a living animal only. For now, it's better to ignore it until the next guy takes the job.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.