Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
It's News Guys, But Not As We Know it!
#86
It's an article I showed Boy In A Dress and informed him that he could join a crowd that is fairly
exclusive. Sadly, I fail as my own low-slung gusset, off-white old-man under-crackers seem
to decay almost straight away.

BIAD -as some are aware, doesn't wear pants and I'm hoping he'll want to be 'one-of-the-crowd'.
I used the word 'in-crowd' when I showed him the piece.
tinywondering



Quote:That's pants! Some men admit to keeping their old underwear
for more than 20 YEARS, a new poll reveals.

'Some men have admitted to keeping underwear for more than 20 years, a new poll has found.
Clothing firm Tom Clinch conducted a poll, which found that the average British man only buys
new pants once every five years.

[Image: attachment.php?aid=7936]

But even when they do decide to get new briefs, partners or parents often by the essential item
as birthday or Christmas gifts, The Sun reported. More than two in five men admitted their partners
buy their underwear, while more than a third still rely on their mothers.  

The firm's founder Nick Clinch said it was 'depressing' to find out how 'infrequently' men invest in
underwear. He said: 'They don't hesitate to throw money at expensive suits but cut corners with
underwear. It's like buying a Ferrari and filling it up with cooking oil. 

'It breaks my heart to see women in shops dutifully buying packs of pants for their husbands in their
40s and 50s.' But some experts say underwear should be replaced every year as, even with regular
washing, they can still become a breeding ground for infection-causing bacteria. 

This comes after a YouGov survey found loose fitting boxer shorts are the undergarment of choice
for 38 per cent of men. It found briefs or Y-fronts were favoured by 27 per cent, while 25 per cent
preferred a tighter boxer. 

Experts said the reason for briefs's popularity is due to support, particularly with men who use the
gym frequently. Fertility doctors also say wearing tight pants for too long can affect sperm count...'
Daily Mail:


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 


Messages In This Thread
It's News Guys, But Not As We Know it! - by BIAD - 05-26-2019, 10:00 AM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 10-21-2019, 11:51 AM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 10-23-2019, 05:16 PM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 10-29-2019, 11:14 AM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 12-21-2019, 11:17 AM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 01-22-2020, 01:20 PM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 01-31-2020, 02:43 PM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 02-11-2020, 10:41 AM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 02-26-2020, 10:04 AM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 03-31-2020, 10:04 AM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 04-01-2020, 07:22 AM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 04-19-2020, 08:41 AM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 05-17-2020, 04:23 PM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 05-18-2020, 09:54 AM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 06-08-2020, 01:25 PM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by BIAD - 06-27-2020, 03:57 PM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 11-21-2020, 12:17 PM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 11-21-2020, 01:57 PM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 01-24-2021, 06:01 PM
RE: It's News Jim, But Not As We Know it! - by Wallfire - 01-24-2021, 08:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)