Propaganda watch

[BIAD]

Oh good-heavens BIAD... not another 'I hate the BBC's lies' article?!!

Take a look at the headline... seriously think about the consequences of how democracy is supposed to
work and the repercussions of such a decision. Here we have an actual article that indicates the British
Government are going to against the people who they're supposed to serve.

The BBC are reporting that if the Prime Minister's version of leaving the European Union isn't agreed to
by Parliament, the whole democratically-decided plan will be dropped. Signed laws that witness such an
agreement between the EU overlords, the countries that make up the Union and Great Britain itself, will
be just ignored and forgotten about.

It's quite an alarming report, if true.

Theresa May says no Brexit more likely than no deal



'Prime Minister Theresa May is making a last-ditch attempt to persuade MPs to back her Brexit deal
as Tuesday's key Commons vote looms closer.

She will use a speech on Monday to warn that Parliament is more likely to block Brexit than let the UK
leave without a deal...'

And so we are now notified that the BBC has the basic outline of what is in a speech of the Prime Minister.
Its contents will state that the referendum to stay or leave the EU will be ignored due to the politicians demanding
the opposite of its outcome.
One has to wonder if the same would've happened if the UK had decided to remain and those in Parliament had
wanted out.

'...Mrs May will add that trust in politics will suffer "catastrophic harm" if the referendum result is not implemented.
Labour has vowed to table a vote of no confidence if Mrs May loses...'

Now there's an understatement! Lack of trust will be a given and closely followed by riots on the streets!
This isn't about Brexit, it's about decision-making by the majority being over-ruled by a class of people for their
own aims.

If such a decision is made, then -and without commentary by the BBC, it means that anything can be overturned.
If a majority of UK subjects of the Crown have a General Election, then an alternative victor can be chosen by
Parliament.
A preferred Prime Minister can be chosen without input by the public and any laws that benefit that same public
can just be tossed-out in favour of more oppressing rules.

Oh, and you can wave goodbye to the current mob of fops in the House of Commons, the rage in Britain's streets
would guarantee a new, more public-orientated person would lead the angry gang of insulted mainly-white men
and that person would listen to what they wanted.

I reckon that such a street-savvy person would become Chancellor of all and rule with an iron fist... a white iron fist.
It's happened before.

'...Its leader Jeremy Corbyn said Labour would vote against the deal and would start moves to trigger a general
election if it is voted down. He told the BBC's Andrew Marr show: "We will table a motion of no confidence in the
government at a time of our choosing, but it's going to be soon, don't worry about it."...'

The Labour Party will not be drawn on a final decision on whether they'd honour the referendum or not due to seeing
how the land lies with a possible General Election. Remember, it makes no real difference which social constitution
you adhere to in Westminster, they all piss in the same pot.

'...Mrs May's speech comes amid reports MPs plan to take control of Brexit if her deal is defeated.
About 100 Conservative MPs, and the Democratic Unionist Party's 10 MPs, are currently expected to join Labour
and the other opposition parties in voting against the deal.

Speaking to factory workers, Mrs May will say on Monday: "As we have seen over the last few weeks, there are
some in Westminster who would wish to delay or even stop Brexit and who will use every device available to them
to do so." She is to add that she now believes MPs blocking Brexit is more likely than a no-deal scenario...'

Ah, it's supposed to be a comment! (I write this before her speech is given). I can understand those who 'wish' to
do something, but reality has a nasty habit of stifling such unicorn-poo. One would've thought that since this is an
official leak of Mrs. May's speech, the BBC wouldn't have felt the need to reiterate the threat in the same paragraph!
Unless it's not a leak.

'...Mrs May will say: "I ask MPs to consider the consequences of their actions on the faith of the British people in our
democracy. "Imagine if an anti-devolution House of Commons had said to the people of Scotland or Wales that despite
voting in favour of a devolved legislature, Parliament knew better and would overrule them.
Or else force them to vote again...'

An example no-less violent than my own samples.
I'm not a shill for May or her Tory cronies, but the reality offered here does show how a decision of anything doesn't
mean it will always be something you like.

'..."What if we found ourselves in a situation where Parliament tried to take the UK out of the EU in opposition to a
remain vote? "People's faith in the democratic process and their politicians would suffer catastrophic harm.
We all have a duty to implement the result of the referendum."...'

I swear I hadn't read May's comment above before I started writing here, but the question does have merit.
The change in a civilised paradigm would be something we haven't witnessed since before the Second World War.

'...She is to give the example of the Welsh devolution referendum in 1997, when people voted by a margin of 0.3% to
create the Welsh Assembly, arguing: "That result was accepted by both sides and the popular legitimacy of that
institution has never seriously been questioned."

However, records show Mrs May did in fact herself vote against the establishment of the Welsh Assembly after that
referendum - while the 2005 Conservative manifesto pledged to offer the Welsh people a "referendum on whether
to keep the Assembly in its current form, increase its powers or abolish it"...'

The BBC displaying it's inability to understand the difference between neutral leadership and petty preferences...
Again.

'...In her speech on Monday, Mrs May will add: "Parliament understood this fact when it voted overwhelmingly to trigger
Article 50. And both major parties did so too when they stood on election manifestos in 2017 that pledged to honour
the result of the referendum."...'

Another reality-statement that sadly doesn't soothe the feelings of the pompous BBC editorial department, but they're
obligated to put it in.

(The rest is more slanted rhetoric from the BBC and politicians who favour the BBC's narrative)
BBC: