(09-22-2018, 09:00 PM)guohua Wrote: ...My husband said the same thing you did,,,, But I have to wonder, did you read this part about the Scottish Green Party.
Quote:Meanwhile, a cross-party group of politicians including Scottish Green MSPs and Labour and SNP MEPsWHO in their right mind would do Such a Thing!!
have won an appeal at the Court of Session in Edinburgh to take their case to the EU Court of Justice to
argue that Article 50 — the official mechanism for leaving the EU triggered in March 2017 — can be revoked
without the permission of the other 27 member states.
Source
MEPS of Scotland, that's who! Their current positions will be no longer needed, their wishful-thing annoys
those resigned to the United Kingdom's decision and it makes good 'outrage' copy!
Of course the Scottish MEPs can go to the unseen Commission and debate their case, it's an ideal opportunity
to show democracy in action and a political strong-arm tactic to Westminster in order of a job within the Civil
Service. The best way to shut them up is to create a post and with a nice pension, put the moaners in those
positions and eh presto, everyone's happy!
It also gets the respective political parties' names in the news with the hopes that those who didn't agree with
the referendum outcome will join the Green Party or the Labour Party or even The Scottish Nationalist Party.
Now... which one of them is governing at the moment?!!
It would be easy to condemn both sides of the issue and the media-conduits they used to explain why
the British public didn't understand the alleged nuances involved in leaving a multi-faceted agreement.
For the majority, they didn't know the full ins-and-outs, yet they made a democratic decision.
What pisses the Remainers off -a title that really means those who believe they benefit from being the EU,
is that it didn't go their way and many of them have platforms to bitch about it!
The reality is this and it's a true that many of the working and middle-class already understand.
To demand that Company A cannot trade with Company B is a sanction, a punishment from one party
to another in the forum of finance, business or assistance in governing.
It's a threatened penalty for disobeying a law or rule, which is only applicable when an agreed law or rule
is broken. The EU -a group of countries that agreed to certain regulations in trade and finance, have rules
when it comes to a nation deciding to leave their group.
To behave otherwise would be a demand that a country wishing to join the European Union must hand over
its sovereignty and ergo, its power of control and laws.
Business in the EU and the UK will continue to trade, but there are certain obstacles when it comes to the
logistics of trade. Hence, discussions on solving these problems is ongoing. Money is there from Company
A and Company B wants it, it's that simple.
Ask yourself this, if leaving the European Union is such a bad thing, then why did over 50% of British voters
select to leave? Is it that over half of the people in the UK are stupid and didn't listen to the pros-and-cons
of doing so...?
Or was it that the true circumstances of being in the EU or using the World Trade Organisation were not fairly
displayed?
The EU is a ponzi scheme that generates nothing. The EU doesn't manufacture anything, it doesn't create anything
that the millions of people it sets regulations for can use. It's a group of individual countries looking for affiliates
that benefit from something and out-voting those who oppose what they want.
Ask the British fishery-community.
Another aspect to the reality of this subject is that our only access to information regarding unelected bureaucrats
complaining of the free will of a people, is from biased news outlets.
Take this example for instance:
'Brexit: Labour 'would back members' on new vote, says leadership'
A political group that isn't governing the UK is having a conference and in order to garner clicks, it sets the heading
in such a way as to imply that the Labour Party are having a vote against the outcome of the referendum.
The Labour party -like others, is constantly attempting to appease its members and convince others to join.
But by slightly changing the reall reason -a wish to vote on the outcome of the negotiations between the UK and the
EU (notice I changed the usual standing there? The MSM always place the EU first!)...the BBC have implied that the
Labour Party want another referendum.
It insults the reader and those its reporting on, and that fine with a Government-funded broadcaster!
I'm not a Labour voter, but its disingenuous to ignore the deception. The idea of being honourable is scoffed at in
the MSM and by most politicians, and they think the general public don't see it!
.......................................
This is why the mainstream media and their political allies are going after alternative information providers that reside
on the internet. The established narrative is being doubted by those who've grown up in a technological age where the
usual channels have been left behind.
As I've said before, the current situation isn't about ideologies, race or gender, it's a class-war where those in power
have failed to monitor the repercussions of the change in a global society. We can be shallow and call it an aloofness
or complacency that caused the establishment to miss this undercurrent of people who're no longer listening to their
'betters', but it's happened and now they're scrambling to fix the problem.
That's why the EU's article 13 is being pushed, a clampdown on the freedom of opinion via the use of copyrighted
material under the fair-use agreement. Most of those sitting in the opulent Strasbourg parliament will have no idea
what that means, but it's a controlling device that might stifle some who disagree with their in-group rational.
And the supposedly-neutral reporting media...?
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.