(09-16-2018, 03:17 PM)Amaterasu Solar Wrote: You have observed Humans in a scarcity paradigm, enslaved to Others, artificially governed by psychopaths who control information, with secondary psychopathy promoted. Your view of "Human nature" is skewed both by these facts and by the fact that the psychopaths in control do ghastly things and in Their media blame "Human nature." The result of the two Humans left would depend fully on whether one or both were psychopaths.
Can you expound upon how you would bring this "abundance paradigm" about, and cite an example of it at any time in human history? By "any time in human history", I mean from the old paleolithic onwards, when humans first walked their world, Say, for example, from the Acheulian upwards to now.
Quote:There is no need to kill anyOne. Remove the tool and systems that promote psychopaths to power to wreak all this havoc in Human society. When They have no more or less power than the next One, They can be handled. 1% of Us are primary psychopaths, genetically incapable of love, caring, or empathy for Others. Another 5% are secondary psychopaths. I say 94% of Us can handle Individuals who choose unEthically. Especially when They have so very little motive to do so.
And "killing" psychopaths requires a witch hunt, something quite unEthical.
This may be revisited once the answer to the above question is attended to.
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’