The European Union & It's Problems.

[BIAD]

I believe that Macrons lord and masters told him to back down.
I believe people understand that the "fuel tax" was to pay for the imports and if pushed too hard there
was a real possibility of a the government losing to the people of  France.

If any one has studied how WW2 got started, they will see that the same mistakes are been made by
TPTB in Europe. More and more country's are starting to rebel, the only hope TPTB have of controlling
the people is by new laws about "hate speech"  crushing free speech, and flooding Europe with "imports".
Its an all or nothing now, will Europe and its cultures be destroyed of is there a war on the way.

With the oncoming supposed event of the United Kingdom leaving the trade deal known as the European Union,
the 'Remainers' and their Project Fear are ramping-up their acts of insulting the 51% that voted to leave.

In fact, they're also insulting those who chose to remain by lying to them and allowing 'Remainers' to feed off the
false hope that democracy can be managed.
Remember, when you change the rules, they can sometimes come back and bite you on the ass.

The mainstream media constantly talk about the possibilities of a second referendum where three questions will
be asked and they believe their trick has gone unseen.

Example: 1st Referendum. (Wikipedia sourced)
Stay in the EU. 16,141,241 48.11%
Leave the EU.  17,410,742 51.89%

One question with two answers. A simple vote that had the politicians and their media conduits banging their drums
about silly things like...

If you leave: There'll be no medicine for your lickle children and they will die and Scotland will leave the UK and get a
new currency. The British economy would go into recession by early 2017 and the HM Treasury stated half a million
jobs would be lost. The Northern Ireland peace talks would fail and the troubles would return.

If you stay:
You won't miss-out on all the subsidies and free travel around Europe. The best is yet to come and everything you
enjoy will remain the same.

Not long after the UK Referendum, those who didn't like the outcome came up with a new idea that could -if fell for,
swing the vote back in their favour and the MSM ate it up with a spoon. A second referendum.
But this time, it would have three questions because it's constantly screamed through the television screen that the
docile public didn't understand all the pros and cons of the vote.

Proposed Example: 2nd Referendum. 
Leave the European Union without a deal.
Leave the European Union with Theresa Mays' current or future Brexit deal.
Remain in the European Union.

So what would be a possible outcome? Well, the obvious trick is that the 'Leave' vote would be split and the two
first questions could provide a logical -though deceitful outcome would be that the single question of 'Remain' has
more votes! More votes wins, yeah?
Da-dah...!

And does anyone think that the same mainstream media hasn't seen this? Of course they have, but they'll never
report it. But my focus isn't on how the MSM report on the UK leaving the European Union, it's on how it offers
articles about different subjects that can be tainted by their preferred 'Remain' narrative

So are UK media outlets biased in their 'Brexit' reporting?
YouGov says:

"...A further 31% of Brits consider the Express to be pro-Brexit, while BBC News is seen as the second most
anti-Brexit news source, at 27%, followed by The Independent on 23%.

The broadcast outlets in the survey -Sky News, BBC News, ITV News and Channel 4 News –are the most likely
to be seen as “neither” pro- nor anti-Brexit, at 14-24%.

While there are many notable differences between the perceptions of Remain and Leave voters –their aforementioned
views on BBC News being the most pronounced –these can mostly be attributed to the fact that Leave voters are more
likely to say they “don’t know” what an outlet’s stance on Brexit is.

For instance, the fact that Remain voters are much more likely to think the Daily Mail is pro-Brexit than Leave voters –53%
to 35% –isn’t because Leave voters think the paper is anti-Brexit or neutral, it is simply because they are 12 percentage
points more likely to not know the Mail’s stance.

In fact, almost all the statistically significant distinctions between the attitudes of Remain and Leave voters that cannot
simply be explained by the difference in “don’t know” answers relate to the broadcasters, which Leave voters are more
likely to see as anti-Brexit...'

Soooo, it sounds like that reporting on Brexit isn't as biased as it seems. But what are the 'outside stories' that the
mainstream media use and how are they utilised? You know, strange dubious tales that imply a certain idea and then
back-tracked on further down the paragraph.
Like this.

Brexit news: No deal means no Christmas as Santa threatened with ban from British borders
British kids are so terrified that Father Christmas will not get into Britain after Brexit they have started writing to MPs.
The nation's children fear Santa –who hails from Lapland in EU country Finland –could be blocked at our borders.

'Ruby Russell, eight, and sister Morgan, nine, from Kent, asked their dad what Brexit meant for Santa.
Dad John, 39, said: "They were both being very serious about their concerns." 
He then suggested they write to their local MP, Rosie Duffield. John said: "I didn't expect them to go ahead with it but
they got writing. "She has invited them to the Houses of Parliament and they are both very excited."...'

Daily Star:

And that's it, a nothing-story about some family and a stupid message that Christmas could be cancelled!


The BBC, one of the most anti-Brexit mediums out there, always have a negative article on the Home page as the main
story. Even if they ignore the London stabbings and the real anti-EU protesting in France, the Beeb can always find
something they can use the words 'could' 'should' or 'possibly' in.

Brexit: Food prices could rise 10%, says Bank governor.
'Food prices could rise between 5% and 10% if there is a disorderly Brexit, the Bank of England governor, Mark Carney,
has warned...'

SOURCE1:

Article 50: Law officer says UK can cancel Brexit.
'The UK should be able to unilaterally cancel its withdrawal from the EU, according to a top European law officer...'

BBC SOURCE:

Sam Gyimah says another referendum may be only option.
'The minister who resigned over Theresa May's Brexit strategy says another referendum may be the only option if
MPs reject the deal...'

SOURCE3:


They can't help it!
So if we abuse the same logic the mainstream media are attempting to use with the '3 Question Vote' idea, I would
suggest not to put your trust in these alleged pipelines of accurate information.

As Wallfire has indicated, many of the countries in the European Union aren't happy with what those driving the EU
are doing. The ignorance of full-blown no-border immigration that those in power are pushing on people only shows
they have no idea of the impact it has on those they're supposed to be representing.

The media are covering for them and I'm struggling to believe it's just because of similar beliefs in the project.
There's got to be more to it than that.

Now... back to smuggling Santa Clause into Dover via a dinghy and getting Rogue Nation into the
Christmas mood.