11-24-2019, 02:24 PM
My final comment above regarding the leader of the Liberal Democrat Party wasn't said in disdain, what I was
hoping to show -via the article and my explanation of the major political parties stances on the 'Brexit' situation,
was that Jo Swinson's party's position on the Leave/Remain question is exasperating
If you agree that governance of a country is to abide by a majority decision, whether it's through an individual
representative of a group voting in that group's favoured manner or whether you ask the whole nation for a
judgement, the result of that request should be adhered to.
A society that asks itself a choice and then ignores the lion's share of the conclusion cannot be deemed democratic
and objective, it's a society that is led from despotic location. Some may think that a little strong in terms of how to
deliver a directive, but if a majority decision is ignored for one particular publicly-chosen request, then a person who
boasts such a manner of governance is an autocrat and is advertising their practice of command with a doubt that
they're incorrect.
That is the underlying mettle of a f*ckin' idiot.
Using a slightly dramatic scenario, if the question was proposed to the public that should the ruling Government
should euthanize every family's first-born and the vote is overwhelmingly against such a deed, does the same
governing body ignore the arrived-at decision and get the knives out?!!
I'm struggling to see how Mrs. Swinson doesn't realise that leadership of a large community is based on a general
trust formed from moralistic deliberation and the notion of implementing what the majority of that community desires.
Maybe her need to offer this dubious aspect of constituents-benefiting administration on television programmes who
work to bolster the failing ratings with rage-inducing articles, is a clue to her ability of political awareness?
Roll on February, where we can get back to some-sort of normality and discuss racism, the Royals and why Epstein
killed himself.
hoping to show -via the article and my explanation of the major political parties stances on the 'Brexit' situation,
was that Jo Swinson's party's position on the Leave/Remain question is exasperating
If you agree that governance of a country is to abide by a majority decision, whether it's through an individual
representative of a group voting in that group's favoured manner or whether you ask the whole nation for a
judgement, the result of that request should be adhered to.
A society that asks itself a choice and then ignores the lion's share of the conclusion cannot be deemed democratic
and objective, it's a society that is led from despotic location. Some may think that a little strong in terms of how to
deliver a directive, but if a majority decision is ignored for one particular publicly-chosen request, then a person who
boasts such a manner of governance is an autocrat and is advertising their practice of command with a doubt that
they're incorrect.
That is the underlying mettle of a f*ckin' idiot.
Using a slightly dramatic scenario, if the question was proposed to the public that should the ruling Government
should euthanize every family's first-born and the vote is overwhelmingly against such a deed, does the same
governing body ignore the arrived-at decision and get the knives out?!!
I'm struggling to see how Mrs. Swinson doesn't realise that leadership of a large community is based on a general
trust formed from moralistic deliberation and the notion of implementing what the majority of that community desires.
Maybe her need to offer this dubious aspect of constituents-benefiting administration on television programmes who
work to bolster the failing ratings with rage-inducing articles, is a clue to her ability of political awareness?
Roll on February, where we can get back to some-sort of normality and discuss racism, the Royals and why Epstein
killed himself.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.