After checking some of the 'accomplishments', there's always the variance on what is actual and what
the reasons are for them. This in no small amount is due to the coddling MSM that -considering he imprisoned
some of them, hung on Barack Obama's every word.
For example, here's Politifact changing the premise of the lesser important statements:
In this obfuscated article, it fails to tell the reader that Sylvia-Stasiewicz -who died in 2011 at the age of 52,
also took care of Teddy Kennedy's mutt and other pets of the Washington Elite.
Like most left-leaning areas, Politifact rely on an history lesson to bail out the time relevant question.
It's a trick that's been used for years. Non-white people were once slaves... so now they must been seen
as a former-oppressed group. Women couldn't vote in the UK, so their voices must be heard today.
Current reality abused by forcing a guilt through feelings of a time unconnected with now.
..........................
It could be that Politifact were staying on track, but the whole wording doesn't indicate that.
My perception of the above is it was written to degrade a 'rumour' that was basically true, they just wished
to separate the cost of Reggie Love's position with the dog trainer.
So did Dawn Sylvia-Stasiewicz work for free...?
This minor situation only grows when another 'accomplishment' is laid beside it.
'...First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because
they “volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences.”...'
Tut-tut, Barack... one would think that this President didn't want a military force!
But overall, there was certainly 'a leaning' -shall we say.
the reasons are for them. This in no small amount is due to the coddling MSM that -considering he imprisoned
some of them, hung on Barack Obama's every word.
For example, here's Politifact changing the premise of the lesser important statements:
Quote:Does Obama have a 'dog-trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense'?SOURCE:
'...The chain email said that "Obama is the first president to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000
a year at taxpayer expense." The claim stitches together a few pieces of accurate information in a way
that makes them inaccurate.
A dog trainer, Dawn Sylvia-Stasiewicz, has been associated with Bo, but she was used briefly and was
never paid by the administration. Meanwhile, Reggie Love was an Obama aide who earned $102,000,
but to the extent that dog handling took any of his time, it was a small fraction of his total duties, and
"dog handler" certainly wasn’t his title.
We rate this claim Pants on Fire...'
In this obfuscated article, it fails to tell the reader that Sylvia-Stasiewicz -who died in 2011 at the age of 52,
also took care of Teddy Kennedy's mutt and other pets of the Washington Elite.
Like most left-leaning areas, Politifact rely on an history lesson to bail out the time relevant question.
It's a trick that's been used for years. Non-white people were once slaves... so now they must been seen
as a former-oppressed group. Women couldn't vote in the UK, so their voices must be heard today.
Current reality abused by forcing a guilt through feelings of a time unconnected with now.
..........................
It could be that Politifact were staying on track, but the whole wording doesn't indicate that.
My perception of the above is it was written to degrade a 'rumour' that was basically true, they just wished
to separate the cost of Reggie Love's position with the dog trainer.
So did Dawn Sylvia-Stasiewicz work for free...?
This minor situation only grows when another 'accomplishment' is laid beside it.
'...First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because
they “volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences.”...'
Tut-tut, Barack... one would think that this President didn't want a military force!
But overall, there was certainly 'a leaning' -shall we say.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.