(04-22-2020, 06:11 AM)Ninurta Wrote: ...There may, or may not, have been a "bigfoot hunt", but Mr. Davis' video gives no evidence either way
- it appears to me to not relate to the tale at all!
It is all a bit dubious -at best!
I asked earlier in the thread if Rogue Nation members could check-out this YouTuber because of his 'confrontational'
manner on how he views other more-established Bigfoot 'experts' and it seems the latest Bobby Short situation does
involve him.
His name is Steve Isdahl and he seems to be a game hunter.
M.K. Davis has been around for a long time on YouTube and is seen as an 'Elder' of the Sasquatch research community.
Mr. Isdahl & Mr. Davis.
From one of his recent videos, Mr. Isdahl states that he'd become involved with the late-Ms. Short's claim that:
1. A professional group of Canadian hunters were brought into the Bluff Creek location in order to rid
the area of Bigfoot.
A specialised canine was used to find the creatures and a plan -using a juvenile Bigfoot as bait, was
devised and many adult Bigfoot were killed in their attempt to rescue of the young Bigfoot.
2. Trophies such as heads and pelts were taken and the carcases were dropped into an excavation near
the creek. The incident wasn't reported to local authorities and there's no actual physical record of the
episode.
3. Bobby Short claimed that a second filming exists or existed that showed the Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot
(known as 'Patty'!) digging at a place on the creek bank with a stick and blood in the hole could be seen.
Ms. Short also claims she'd seen the footage.
Whether this is film is part of the Patterson-Gimlin recording or an entirely separate item is unknown.
4. Mr. Isdahl claims that due to his correspondence with fellow-interested Bigfoot researchers, he has
recieved pressure from renown people in the Sasquatch community who are connected with this incident.
This supposedly-opposing faction say the whole idea is untrue and Mr. Isdahl counters with his belief that
the current paradigm of the Bigfoot research is constructed to merely make and take money from those
who are interested in the phenomena.
I'm unsure on all of this, but I am aware that in the YouTube community, 'E-drama' is a regular occurrence.
Situations are often created in order to draw in viewers and entertain them with intrigue and emotion-provoking
narrative.
I agree with Steve Isdahl that very little has changed over years in regards of increased evidence of this alleged
animal and I understand that this slow evolution of research can be seen as a deliberate ploy to maintain financial
benefits.
Honestly, I just don't know.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.