Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The YouTube Bigfoot... What's It All Really About?
#41
(03-21-2020, 09:27 PM)BIAD Wrote: Alberta, Canada seems to be the place where Bigfoot and his family like to hang out.
What do you think? See the baby clinging to its mother's back?!




I didn't even see the momma, much less the baby clinging to her back. I blame it on old age and the poor eyesight that comes with it.

.
" I don't mind killin' a man in a fair fight... or if I think he's gonna start a fair fight... or if there's money involved... or a woman... "

 - Jayne Cobb, Hero of Canton
Reply
#42
Not a Bigfoot, but an Appalachian cryptid nonetheless. These are trail cam photos taken in the Appalachian mountains. The first is a cat, a really big one. The second is a fella named Bill, who stands about 5' 10" tall for size comparison. The last, if it works, is an animated GIF I made to cycle between the two photos so you can get an immediate idea of the cat's size.

It had really big teeth, too.

The photos were taken by a trail cam strapped to a tree within minutes of one another. Bill was on the trail of the cat, ready to shoot it if he needed to, but it moved faster, and he never caught up with it.

They were taken closer to Mystic Wanderer's neck of the woods than mine.



[Image: attachment.php?aid=7323]



[Image: attachment.php?aid=7324]



[Image: attachment.php?aid=7325]



[Image: attachment.php?aid=7326]



There's THINGS out in them big dark woods...





                       



.
" I don't mind killin' a man in a fair fight... or if I think he's gonna start a fair fight... or if there's money involved... or a woman... "

 - Jayne Cobb, Hero of Canton
Reply
#43
(03-22-2020, 04:11 AM)Ninurta Wrote: Not a Bigfoot, but an Appalachian cryptid nonetheless. These are trail cam photos taken in the Appalachian mountains. The first is a cat, a really big one. The second is a fella named Bill, who stands about 5' 10" tall for size comparison. The last, if it works, is an animated GIF I made to cycle between the two photos so you can get an immediate idea of the cat's size.....


[Image: attachment.php?aid=7326]



There's THINGS out in them big dark woods...

Sh*t @Ninurta - That thing is f*ckin' HUGE!!!
Looks like depictions of what I imagine a prehistoric Sabre Tooth might look like.
(And I thought that the house-spider I caught last night was big.....)

G
tinybighuh Being Rogue is WEIRD, But I LIKE IT!tinyfunny 
Reply
#44
I know it's difficult to see, but after enlarging the video, there's supposed to be a large hairy being
stood with its back to the camera.

We're introduced to a deer carcass splayed on a conifer and just behind a snow-laden branch,
a 'Bigfoot' is leaning against a trunk and supposedly attempting to remain still. There is a breeze
and if you look carefully at what is believed (or what is wanted for you to believe) the head area,
black hair does move along with slight movements of the head.

[Image: attachment.php?aid=7328]

This isn't to say this is real, it could well be just a guy in an ape suit and if it is, then he's doing
a lot of shivering work to impress you!

[Image: attachment.php?aid=7329]

The alleged 'baby-Bigfoot' is lower down and looks like (with its back to the camera) to be clinging
at around the waist area.
...........................................
@Ninurta.

Wow, that is one big cat! Do you think it's been identified and classified in the zoological mainstream
circles?


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
       
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#45
[attachment=7335 Wrote:BIAD pid='36114' dateline='1584870299']
@Ninurta.

Wow, that is one big cat! Do you think it's been identified and classified in the zoological mainstream
circles?


Nah, but it's not anything I can't handle with my trusty pointy stick!

@gordi - That's what I thought too - Smilodon. It has the proper massive forelegs and slope to it's back, but I can't make out enough of the tail for a stronger ID. I saw a skeleton of one from La Brea Tar Pits in the Cleveland Museum of Natural History one time, but that was years and years ago, I was just a kid, and can't recall how big it was. the only sure thing is that it would have looked a lot bigger at the time, because I was littler.

I'll scare up a couple more images that are alleged to be the same thing, from different angles when I can. Neither of them show the tail, however, and one shows nothing but the ridge of it's back.

The pictures were all taken in Cherokee County, NC.


ETA - The other pictures:

Footprints - 

[Image: attachment.php?aid=7335]


[Image: attachment.php?aid=7336]


To be honest, the footprints don't look right to me. A big cat's forepaw is usually wider than it is long, and it's rear paw is longer than it is wide - these are closer to perfectly round.


Side view - 

[Image: attachment.php?aid=7337]



Just it's back - 


[Image: attachment.php?aid=7338]


That one was taken by a trail cam placed on a post at a tractor shed on a farm. It could be anything, from a coyote to a wolf to a cryptid to a dog... well, you get the idea. I have no idea how high on the post the trail cam was placed, but it was put there to attempt to identify miscreants mucking about in the shed who weren't supposed to be, so I'm guessing it ought to be about man-height.








                           


.
" I don't mind killin' a man in a fair fight... or if I think he's gonna start a fair fight... or if there's money involved... or a woman... "

 - Jayne Cobb, Hero of Canton
Reply
#46
I went back and reviewed the bigfoot video with the pointers in mind. What I thought was the baby's head moving at first turned out to be a branch waving in the wind. I don't know - it seems awfully still to be a massive creature that could break the videographer in half...
" I don't mind killin' a man in a fair fight... or if I think he's gonna start a fair fight... or if there's money involved... or a woman... "

 - Jayne Cobb, Hero of Canton
Reply
#47
I still couldn't make it out even with you pointing to the body parts.   smallundecided
Reply
#48
(03-23-2020, 05:30 AM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: I still couldn't make it out even with you pointing to the body parts.   smallundecided

Ah yes... Well that's YouTube!!!
tinylaughing
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#49
Hi Folks,
I've tried to look a bit closer into the images shared earlier in the thread...
I've adjusted the Brightness and Contrast in the Big Cat ones (as well as a slight crop to eliminate some flash-back from the structure to the left) to hopefully bring out some more detail...
[Image: attachment.php?aid=7341]

[Image: attachment.php?aid=7342]

[Image: attachment.php?aid=7340]

I've also done a brightness/contrast enhancement along with a hue adjustment to try and see more detail in the "bigfoot" imagery too...
[Image: attachment.php?aid=7343]

[Image: attachment.php?aid=7344]

Thoughts?
G


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
                   
tinybighuh Being Rogue is WEIRD, But I LIKE IT!tinyfunny 
Reply
#50
(03-23-2020, 10:39 AM)gordi Wrote: Thoughts?
G

Cheers for that, Big G. Your new images certainly seems to change things.

Ninurta's Cat:
There's a small voice in me that keeps saying 'canine'... I can see that something in the step-forward
indicates a large cat, but the rough mane and head-posture reminds me of a wolf-like creature.
In every image it looks like a large lion, yet to me, it's like a faint 'canine-ghost' is hovering around it!!

BAID's Bigfoot:
When the image is made mono, the hair becomes more apparent and from what I've read, standing
motionless and not seeking eye-gaze assists to confuse an observer. It helps in the idea of confrontation
by not revealing one's typical stance in the area of attack or defence.

With snow also on the conifer branch and the alleged Bigfoot's hair, this also helps to puzzle the eye.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#51
@gordi.  Thanks, that helped a lot.

I am able to make out a face now, especially the eyes. But still, I don't see the baby.


minusculegoodjob
Reply
#52
(03-23-2020, 04:27 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: @gordi.  Thanks, that helped a lot.
I am able to make out a face now, especially the eyes. But still, I don't see the baby.  

I took a look at the stills available on the web and when the images are turned to grayscale,
it seems quite a bit of 'after-work' has been done around the shoulder areas.

[Image: attachment.php?aid=7349]

I've shaded this above to show the general outline of the supposed Bigfoot and I'm sorry
that I can't offer the outline of the clinging baby. That's because it isn't there on the stills!!

So to make up for my failure, I added another photo allegedly taken from another of the
YouTuber's videos that is supposed to show the face.
Friggin' fakers!


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)