Journalist Who Exposed Clinton Foundation Found Dead

[BIAD]

...Did idiots at scopes not think maybe among the powers that be a similar rule applies...

Snopes is a political vehicle for the purposes of making the internet-public believe there's a benchmark
that is bipartisan and deals only in facts. True, facts are facts, but it's how you purvey them that Snopes
relies on.

If you have a 'stamp-like' image that states False or True, then in the mind of the viewer, there's an element
of assurance because our social default setting is that we all attempt to tell the truth and surely nobody would
leave themselves wide open to ridicule by not researching something they publically comment upon.

Except that this assumption is a double-edged sword.

Take the slain Journalist, who was tragically killed in Bidnija, Malta.
It's reported that Mrs. Galizia was investigating tributary lines of inquiry from the revelations of The Panama
Papers, a leaked set of documents that offer an insight to Deep State financing through tax-excempt offshore
accounts and shell companies.

But these conduits are just channels for money and available to anyone with enough of wealth that wishes to
keep from giving it to the systems that run the countries they exploit. It's an ideal area to be able to avoid
paying tax and to launder money.

Mrs. Galizia was killed with the use of a remotely-triggered bomb and that is a deliberate act.
Can it be said that it was suicide...? Can it be stated that she was murdered?
Would it be appropriate to suggest the Journalist was killed because of her investigations into the ethically
questionable apparatus used by an elite group of powerful people?

Snopes would stamp it 'Unproven'... And if using rational decency, it can be said that the perceived 'honest'
fact-checker would offer this conclusion because all the facts are not in yet.

However, if an organisation that committed illegal activity around the world, protected such an industry with the
use of physical and mental force, bribed officialdom to turn a blind-eye to it's dealings and used non-judgmental
systems to store and enhance it's finances... would they adhere to such methods of moralistic principles?

In my opinion, Mrs. Galizia was intruding into the world of the Established Elite and the rules that many of them
play by, are not the same ones that are regularly enforced towards the public they exploit.

Denial in a red official-looking font works for the majority of the masses because of social conditioning,
conditioning the ones who rule and use such conduits stated in the Panama Papers.