01-11-2017, 08:19 AM
So, I just checked... and as Bob said - the Official Royal Website is NOT the one quoted in the article (www.royal.co.uk)
It is www.royal.uk.
Meaning that even if this stuff did actually appear on the site in the article... it's NOT the official royal site and could therefore have been posted by anyone! For a laugh, a joke, a click-bait teaser...
I still haven't found positive proof that it even did appear on that quoted site anyway!!!!
The whole thing could just be a hoax with faked screenshots, but the bottom line is that it looks to me like a total non-story.
The official Royal website did NOT announce that the Queen had died then retract it.
G
It is www.royal.uk.
Meaning that even if this stuff did actually appear on the site in the article... it's NOT the official royal site and could therefore have been posted by anyone! For a laugh, a joke, a click-bait teaser...
I still haven't found positive proof that it even did appear on that quoted site anyway!!!!
The whole thing could just be a hoax with faked screenshots, but the bottom line is that it looks to me like a total non-story.
The official Royal website did NOT announce that the Queen had died then retract it.
G