This is a really good example of how MSM spins headlines to suit their agenda when it comes to reporting race crimes.
Lets take CNN....
Look at how this one headline reads:
(against a white woman)
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=1020]](http://rogue-nation3.com/attachment.php?aid=1020)
Then notice how race was never mentioned in this horrific act by blacks against white.
Rather passive headline actually, compared to the other one.
Can you imagine if it was 4 whites that did that to a special needs black kid, all the while talking shit about Obama?
Oh hell, the media would come unglued and go into overdrive reporting that, making sure their families were destroyed.
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=1021]](http://rogue-nation3.com/attachment.php?aid=1021)
Yes, the media has a lot to do with how the public will see/read something.
They could if they wanted to, curb the sensational headlines when it comes to race.
But they choose not to and they choose which ones to use race in.
-If it is a white crime against black, skin color is mentioned.
-If it is a black crime against white, nothing to see here folks, move along. Race isn't mentioned in title.
-If it is a white cop against a black, it gets top billing.
-If it is a black cop against a black, no one knows about it.
Whether it is for ratings or to push an agenda, it is wrong to do so on so many levels, keeping us divided being one of them.
But nothing we can do about it, except boycott news outlets who play the race-card when it suits them.
Lets take CNN....
Look at how this one headline reads:
(against a white woman)
Then notice how race was never mentioned in this horrific act by blacks against white.
Rather passive headline actually, compared to the other one.
Can you imagine if it was 4 whites that did that to a special needs black kid, all the while talking shit about Obama?
Oh hell, the media would come unglued and go into overdrive reporting that, making sure their families were destroyed.
Yes, the media has a lot to do with how the public will see/read something.
They could if they wanted to, curb the sensational headlines when it comes to race.
But they choose not to and they choose which ones to use race in.
-If it is a white crime against black, skin color is mentioned.
-If it is a black crime against white, nothing to see here folks, move along. Race isn't mentioned in title.
-If it is a white cop against a black, it gets top billing.
-If it is a black cop against a black, no one knows about it.
Whether it is for ratings or to push an agenda, it is wrong to do so on so many levels, keeping us divided being one of them.
But nothing we can do about it, except boycott news outlets who play the race-card when it suits them.