'Russia has dismissed U.S. accusations that Moscow intervened in the presidential
election as "infighting" between security agencies.
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=900]](http://rogue-nation3.com/attachment.php?aid=900)
U.S. intelligence agencies had concluded with "high confidence" that Moscow interfered
in the Presidential election to aid Donald Trump's campaign and harm the chances of a
potential Hilary Clinton administration.
Russian officials have consistently and fervently denied allegations of interference in the
U.S. election.
"It looks like banal infighting between U.S. security services," Maria Zakharova, Russia's
foreign ministry spokeswoman, wrote in a Facebook post on Tuesday...'
SOURCE:
...................................
'According to a “secret CIA assessment,” Russia intervened in the U.S. election to
undermine confidence in the electoral system and boost support for Donald Trump.
The president-elect has already rejected this notion, though the implications of claims
regarding Russian involvement are still unclear.
Once again, this kind of pro-Clinton/anti-Russian-based narrative has already been
completely debunked. For example, in his recent article, “Anonymous Leaks to the
WashPost About the CIA’s Russia Beliefs Are No Substitute for Evidence,”
Glenn Greenwald brilliantly explains why this story does not merit our attention.
He astutely notes:
“There is still no such evidence for any of these claims.
What we have instead are assertions, disseminated by anonymous people, completely
unaccompanied by any evidence, let alone proof.
As a result, none of the purported evidence — still — can be publicly seen, reviewed,
or discussed. Anonymous claims leaked to newspapers about what the CIA believes
do not constitute proof, and certainly do not constitute reliable evidence that substitutes
for actual evidence that can be reviewed.”...'
SOURCE:
A Hillary Hissy fit or confusion from the media...?
election as "infighting" between security agencies.
U.S. intelligence agencies had concluded with "high confidence" that Moscow interfered
in the Presidential election to aid Donald Trump's campaign and harm the chances of a
potential Hilary Clinton administration.
Russian officials have consistently and fervently denied allegations of interference in the
U.S. election.
"It looks like banal infighting between U.S. security services," Maria Zakharova, Russia's
foreign ministry spokeswoman, wrote in a Facebook post on Tuesday...'
SOURCE:
...................................
'According to a “secret CIA assessment,” Russia intervened in the U.S. election to
undermine confidence in the electoral system and boost support for Donald Trump.
The president-elect has already rejected this notion, though the implications of claims
regarding Russian involvement are still unclear.
Once again, this kind of pro-Clinton/anti-Russian-based narrative has already been
completely debunked. For example, in his recent article, “Anonymous Leaks to the
WashPost About the CIA’s Russia Beliefs Are No Substitute for Evidence,”
Glenn Greenwald brilliantly explains why this story does not merit our attention.
He astutely notes:
“There is still no such evidence for any of these claims.
What we have instead are assertions, disseminated by anonymous people, completely
unaccompanied by any evidence, let alone proof.
As a result, none of the purported evidence — still — can be publicly seen, reviewed,
or discussed. Anonymous claims leaked to newspapers about what the CIA believes
do not constitute proof, and certainly do not constitute reliable evidence that substitutes
for actual evidence that can be reviewed.”...'
SOURCE:
A Hillary Hissy fit or confusion from the media...?
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.