Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
HILLARY CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS
#17
(11-28-2016, 12:44 PM)Grace Wrote: According to the post they are letting the Clinton campaign "oversee" the recount..

I don't trust that at all, at all.

Everyone knows that the most predictable way to go is to set the fox guarding the hen house. You may not LIKE the results of such action, but there is little doubt that you can predict them. If you want a predictable future to factor into your planning, then the safest bet is to always set the fox guarding the hen house.

Quote:This election  is a fight for the future of this country for at least the next 40 years and beyond due to trade agreements and supreme court appointments.

Indeed. See above paragraph for thought on factoring predictability into long-range planning efforts.

Quote:I put nothing past them at this point. Everything I predicted about how the left would react has come true, because of the position this election puts them in, either way it went. They were too close to their utopian dream to hand it over now without a fight and I will be surprised if there is not more up their sleeves.

There IS more up their sleeves, and it ain't pretty. Just ask a Cuban, a Nicaraguan, an El Salvadoran, an older Russian (from the Soviet days, which the Democrats are furiously trying to blend in with the new Russian Federation to pull the wool over folks' eyes), an Angolan, a Zimbabwean, a Campuchean, the list goes on and on. This story has played out on innumerable stages before - it's just our turn now. It has been defeated upon occasion, but in each of those cases of defeat, there was a strong anti-communist government already in place to combat it, which is not the case here. Don't look to the government for help against the insurgency because our current government SUPPORTS the insurgency, and it'll take time to clean house even after a governmental handoff. That time it takes is what the Collectivists are banking on - they'll throw the rod and insert the wedges before that cleanup can occur, to keep things off balance and the turmoil in play. Collectivism cannot win except by maintaining chaos.

Quote:With them letting the Clinton camp so close to the recount where they might be able to salt in enough fake votes to throw the election, anything is possible.

That said, whatever is up their sleeve, whether it's in this recount or something else, is coming I think.

Yup, it's coming. Salting in MORE votes for Clinton will not be sufficient - they've already salted in 4 million fake votes (dead folk and illegal aliens), and that wasn't enough. They will also have to either negate or "flip" a large quantity of Trump votes, "lose" them in some way, to create the turnover. Look for  a large number of "misplaced" votes to come into the mix, just as was done by the Collectivists on behalf of Al Franken a few years back. Remember those "forgotten votes" they suddenly "found" in some guy's trunk? Yeah, look for something like THAT to happen... but it won't be enough, and they will have to flip a number of Trump votes to succeed.

I don't think it will be successful, even with the foxes running the hen house, and when it isn't, I expect all hell is going to break loose.

Emotional people are dangerous people, as any study of the Mob Mentality will tell you. The emotional polarity currently found in the US has only been seen here a few times, and every time it has, hell came to dinner. The 1960's and the American Civil War were such times. We have now, for several years - a couple decades - been inexorably moving towards Collectivism (what you are referring to as "Globalism"). That was the reason for the Neocon takeover of the Republican party - so that the Republicans would march in lockstep with the Socialists and Democrats. That is why you have not seen any major changes when government was "handed over" from one to the other. they are - or were - both sides of the same coin, and one administration would just take over where the last left off and steer in the same direction, regardless of which letter was in front of their names. They all acted the same. Now, along comes Trump and upsets the apple cart for them, which explains why BOTH sides went after Trump... and will continue to do so, the "civil unrest" (that's a euphemism - it's what polite folk call "insurrection and civil war") is calculated to keep folk off-balance so they don't notice the game in play... or their bit parts in it.

Interesting times we live in. The fight against Communism is apparently not as dead as folks thought when the Soviet Union collapsed and the Wall came down. It has only changed the location of it's power centers.


.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.

Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’




Messages In This Thread
HILLARY CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS - by guohua - 11-27-2016, 12:36 AM
RE: HILLARY CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS - by BIAD - 11-27-2016, 11:38 AM
RE: HILLARY CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS - by BIAD - 11-27-2016, 05:54 PM
RE: HILLARY CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS - by BIAD - 11-28-2016, 12:55 PM
RE: HILLARY CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS - by BIAD - 11-28-2016, 01:43 PM
RE: HILLARY CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS - by Ninurta - 11-28-2016, 06:04 PM
RE: HILLARY CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS - by BIAD - 11-28-2016, 05:23 PM
RE: HILLARY CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS - by BIAD - 11-28-2016, 09:53 PM
RE: HILLARY CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS - by BIAD - 11-29-2016, 12:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)