(11-08-2021, 10:50 PM)GeauxHomeLittleD Wrote: Interestingly enough the whole signal/ frequency aspect is something that apparently Kdog has been suspicious about since the switch to digital. He went to college for electronics back in the days of yore (analog). He is in the process of diving into research from this perspective right now. I trust his opinion over anything the government has to say any day of the week!
I'm right there with him. I took two years of Electronics Technology in high school at a trade school, and a further two years of Electronics Engineering at a Community College, and have been building my own computers for over 25 years now. I did some of the engineering at a ccommercial radio station that I was a DJ at, under the supervision of a licensed radio engineer, because my licensing was a "Restricted Radiotelephone Operator" license - good for life, but only for small-scale stuff.
The forced move from analog to digital in TV signals worried me, because it did not make any sense, and the FCC could not make any convincing arguments for the move to anyone with a basic understanding of electronics. 5G came along, and that did not make any sense, either, nor could it be made to make sense. Both seemed to me to be a change just for the sake of a change, with no real improvement to end-users, and a tremendous outlay of cash from the originators, with no clear advantages to anyone.
Then the forced vaccines, graphene oxide, and xenobots... and things started to make more sense, and not in a good way.
Digital signals are really good for programming digital devices....
ETA: If you "Google" graphene and vaccine, you get a crap ton of "fact checker" hit pieces claiming there is no graphene in the vaccines. Here are some other, contentious, links to ponder:
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/de/d...N317065497
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-58405210
https://www.audacy.com/podcasts/end-time...-570695968
Sub link from that article: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-14-s...oxide.html
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlel...c5nr09208f
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsanm.1c02446
Think for yourself, make up your own mind in the matter. Don't take my word for it, and don't take "journalists" (and note well that journalists are not scientists or medical researchers any more than I am) words against it, either. Research, and decide for yourself.
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’